REACTIONS OF CHLORINATION
[6] V. Girardon, M. Tessier, E. Marechal, Polymer Bull 1994, 33(6), 657.
[7] K. Sreekumar, V. N. Rajasekharan Pillai, Polymer 1987, 28(9), 1599.
[8] M. Deborde, U. von Gunten, Water Res 2008, 42(1–2), 13.
[9] J. M. Antelo, F. Arce, J. Crugeiras, M. Parajó, J Phys Org Chem 1997,
10, 631.
[10] T. Higuchi, A. Hussain, I. H. Pitman. J Chem Soc (B) 1969, 626.
[11] J. M. Antelo, F. Arce, J. Franco, M. C. Garcia Lopez, M. Sanchez, A.
Varela, Int J Chem Kinet 1988, 20, 397.
On the other hand, these representations (Figs. 9–12) show two
tendencies in the formation reactions of N-chloramines with the
four chlorinating agents that are compared: reactions in which
the chlorine atom of chlorinating agent is bound to an oxygen
atom (HOCl and BuOCl) and other two reactions in which the
chlorine atom is bound to a nitrogen atom (NCS and NCNMPT).
t
[12] M. M. Campbell, G. Johnson, Chem Rev 1978, 78(1), 65.
[13] B. T. Gowda, D. S. Mahadevappa, J Chem Soc Perkins Trans 1983,
2, 323.
[14] B. T. Gowda, M. Shetty, J Phys Org Chem 2004, 17, 848.
[15] M. K. Veeraiah, A. S. A. Murthy, N. M. M. Gowda, Synth React Inorg
Met-Org Nano-Met Chem 2010, 40(4), 225.
[16] X. Yang, C. Fan, S. Chii, Q. Zhao, Water Res 2010, 44, 2691.
[17] S. Lui, G. Sun, Ind Eng Chem Res 2009, 48, 613.
[18] M. M. Donnermair, E. R. Blatchley, III, Water Res 2003, 37, 1557.
[19] F. D. Chattaway, O. G. Backeberg, J Chem Soc 1923, 123, 2999.
[20] F. D. Chattaway, O. G. Backeberg, J Chem Soc 1924, 125, 1097.
[21] M. Zimmer, L. F. Audrieth, J Am Chem Soc 1954, 76, 3856.
[22] M. Anbar, I. Dostrovsky, J Chem Soc 1954, 1094.
[23] Y.-L. Zhong, P. G. Bulger, S. G. Newman, M. Lautens, Org Synth 2010,
87, 8.
CONCLUSION
The kinetic studies of reaction of tBuOCl with 2,2,2-
trifluoroethylamine, benzylamine, glycine and dimethylamine
carried out in acidic medium show that the reaction is of first-
order with respect to each of the reagents except with 2,2,2-
trifluoroethylamine. In this case, the reaction order with respect
to the amine varied with pH.
The kinetic results obtained in the study of the reactions of
benzylamine, glycine and dimethylamine with BuOCl allowed
t
us to propose a reaction mechanism in which takes place a nu-
cleophilic attack of these compounds over the chlorine atom of
tBuOCl in the determining step. Whereas in the reaction with
2,2,2-trifluoroethylamine, two determining steps were necessar-
ily proposed because of the most acidic characteristics of this
compound to the other compounds studied. Thus, in this case,
it is possible that the protonated amine itself can act as a species
that catalyzes the reaction process.
The rate constants obtained in the present work were com-
pared with other values available in literature for the reaction
of these nitrogenous compounds with other chlorinating agents
(HOCl, NCS and NCNMPT), following the order
[24] Y. Chen, L. Wang, H. J. Yu, Q. Shi, X. Dong, J Mater Sci 2007,
42(11), 4018.
[25] V. Benin, P. Kaszynski, J. G. Radziszewski, Tetrahedron 2002,
58(11), 2085.
[26] J. M. Antelo, F. Arce, J. Crugeiras, C. Pastoriza, A. Rios, J Chem Res (S)
2001, 1, 20.
[27] D. W. Margerum, E. T. Gray, R. P. Huffman, ACS Symposium Series
1978, 82, 278.
[28] I. Weil, J. C. Morris, Am Chem Soc 1949, 71, 1664.
[29] T. Higuchi, A. Hussain, I. H. Pitman, J Chem Soc (B) 1969, 626.
[30] C. Pastoriza, J. M. Antelo, J. Crugeiras, J Phys Org Chem 2013,
26(7), 551.
[31] C. Pastoriza, J. M. Antelo, J. Crugeiras, A. Peña-Gallego, J Phys Org
Chem 2014, 27, 407.
[32] W. A. Weaver, J. Li, Y. Wen, J. Johnston, M. R. Blatchey, E. R. Blatchey,
III, Water Res 2009, 43, 3308.
kHOCl > k
> kNCS > kNCNMPT
tBuOCI
These values allowed us to establish different free-energy rela-
tionships that allow us to corroborate the proposed mechanism.
In these relationships, a similar behavior for the N-chlorination
reactions of organic nitrogenous compounds with an amine
group (2,2,2-trifluoroethylamine, benzylamine, glycine and
[33] S. Bosillon, M. Lemasle, E. Renault, D. Toza, V. Heim, A. Laplanche,
Chemosphere 2009, 77, 1035.
[34] M. Huerta-Fontela, M. T. Galceran, F. Ventura, Water Res 2011,
45, 1432.
[35] S. K. Khetan, T. J. Collins, Chem Rev 2007, 107, 2319.
[36] H. M. Teeter, E. W. Bell, Org Synth 1963, 4, 125.
[37] C. Walling, B. B. Jacknow, J Am Chem Soc 1960, 82, 6108.
[38] X. L. Armesto, M. Canle, M. Losada, J. A. Santaballa, Int J Chem Kin
1993, 25, 1.
[39] X. L. Armesto, M. Canle, M. Losada, J. A. Santaballa, J Chem Soc Perkin
Trans 1993, 2, 181.
[40] J. M. Antelo, F. Arce, M. C. Castro, J. Crugeiras, J. C. Pérez-Moure,
P. Rodríguez, Int Chem Kinet 1995, 27, 703.
[41] J. M. Antelo, F. Arce, M. Parajó, J Phys Org Chem 1996, 9, 447.
[42] J. M. Antelo, F. Arce, D. Casal, P. Rodríguez, A. Varela, Tetrahedron
1989, 45, 3955.
[43] J. M. Antelo, F. Arce, J. Casado, E. Novoa, M. E. Sánchez, A. Varela, An
Quim 1987, 83, 589.
[44] M. Anbar, D. Ginsburg, Chem Revs 1954, 54, 925.
[45] W. H. Carothers, C. F. Bickford, G. J. Hurwitz, J Am Chem Soc 1927,
49, 2908.
[46] C. K. M. Heo, J. W. Bunting, J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1994, 2, 2279.
[47] M. M. Cox, W. P. Jencks, J Am Chem Soc 1981, 103, 572.
[48] X. L. Armesto, M. Canle, J. A. Santaballa, Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 275.
[49] D. Matte, B. Solastiouk, A. Merlin, X. Deglise, Can J Chem 1989,
67, 786.
t
dimethylamine), with BuOCl or with HOCl or ClOꢀ was found.
This behavior was expected because of the similarity between
the chlorinating agents: both have a Cl+ atom bonded to an ox-
ygen atom. Moreover, the k2nd values obtained in both reactions
are in the same order of magnitude, so that, any of these chlori-
nating agents may be used for the N-chloramines formation re-
actions being the only difference stability of the chlorinating
agent. In this sense, it is necessary to take precautions in the
preparation and storing of tBuOCl because hydrolysis could
place, and in that case, the reaction occurs directly between
the HOCl formed and the nitrogenous compound. For this rea-
t
son, the use of BuOCl, comparing with HOCl, is not an advan-
tage in aqueous solution, while in non aqueous solutions the
tBuOCl is the most suitable.
REFERENCES
[1] P. Kovacic, M. K. Lowery, K. W. Field, Chem Rev 1970, 70, 639.
[2] J. C. Guillemin, J. M. Denis, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 1982, 21, 690.
[3] Y.-L. Zhong, H. Zhou, D. R. Gauthier, J. Lee, D. Askin, U. H. Dolling,
R. P. Volante, Tetrahedron Lett 2005, 46(7), 1099.
[4] Z. Wang, L. Zhu, F. Yin, Z. Su, Z. Li, C. Li, J Am Chem Soc 2012,
134(9), 4258.
[5] B. S. Moodithaya, B. Thimme Gowda, J Indian Chem Soc 2002, 79, 420.
[50] X. L. Armesto, M. Canle, M. V. García, M. Losada, J. A. Santaballa,
Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 521.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Additional supporting information may be found in the online
version of this article at the publisher's website.
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2014, 27 952–959
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/poc