prepared by the reaction of alcohols with PCl3 in the absence
of Et3N. These were then directly reacted with BINOL in
the presence of Et3N to afford the desired product. Ligands
3-6 were easily purified through a short silica gel plug and
were stable in the solid state.
Figure 1.
The catalytic performance of ligands 3-6 was initially
explored in the enantioselective Rh-catalyzed hydrogenation
reaction of dimethyl itaconate. The catalyst was prepared in
situ by mixing [Rh(COD)2]BF4 and the monophosphite
ligands in CH2Cl2. All the hydrogenation reactions were
typically carried out at room temperature under 10 atm
pressure of H2 and with a substrate, Rh, and ligand ratio of
1.0/0.01/0.022. Although a standard reaction time of 12 h
was chosen, most of the reactions were complete within 3
h.
to effectively restrain the rotation of the M-P bond by
secondary interactions (Figure 1).6
For many years, carbohydrates have been extensively
explored as backbones for chiral ligands due to their easy
modification and ready availability. These features are
beneficial for systematically modifying the structure of the
ligands. Excellent results have been obtained with carbohy-
drate-based bidentate ligands in asymmetric hydrogenation.7,8
However, few good monodentate chiral ligands have been
reported based on carbohydrates.9
Herein, we report the synthesis of a new series of
monophosphite ligands 3-6 based on D-fructose and D-
glucose, and their applications in asymmetric hydrogenation
reactions. To ascertain the importance of the monosaccha-
ride10 component affected enantioselectivity and yield of the
asymmetric hydrogenation process, we evaluated a wide
range of ketalated11 carbohydrate derivatives.
The results of the Rh-catalyzed hydrogenation reactions
are summarized in Table 1 and show that the carbohydrate-
derived monophosphites we have created are efficient ligands
for asymmetric hydrogenation. However, the enantioselec-
tivities proved to be influenced dramatically by the structure
of the ligands. Comparison of the results in Table 1 shows
that the enantiomeric excess depends strongly on the absolute
configuration of carbon atom at C-3 in the carbohydrate
backbone. In general, fructose-derived ligands 4a-d, with
R configuration on carbon atom C-3, produced much higher
enantioselectivities than ligands 3a-d with opposite con-
figuration on C-3. For the ligands 3a-d, (S)-BINOL is
matched cooperatively to the corresponding carbohydrate
backbone, while for ligands 4a-d, (R)-BINOL and the
carbohydrate components are matched. With ligand 4a the
The new ligands 3-6 were synthesized very efficiently
from BINOL and the corresponding monosaccharide alco-
hols, which were synthesized on large scale from D-fructose
and D-glucose (Figure 2).12 The RO-PCl2 intermediates were
(6) ) For a review of the secondary interaction, see: Sawamura, M.; Ito,
Y. Chem. ReV. 1992, 92, 857.
(7) (a) Steiborn, D.; Junicke, H. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 4283. (b)
RajanBabu, T. V.; Casalnuovo, A. L.; Ayers, T. A. In AdVances in Catalytic
Process; Doyle, M. P., Ed.; JAI Press: Greenwhich, 1998; Vol. 2, p 1. (c)
Yonehara, K.; Hashizume, T.; Mori, K.; Ohe, K.; Uemura, S. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 5593. (d) Yonehara, K.; Ohe, K.; Uemura, S. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 9381. (d) Hashizume, T.; Yonehara, K.; Ohe, K.; Uemura, S. J. Org.
Chem. 2000, 65, 5197.
(8) For recent advances in this area, see: (a) Dieguez, M.; Ruiz, A.;
Claver, C. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3796. (b) Park, H.; RajanBabu, T. V.;
Yan, Y.-Y.; Shin, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10207. (d) Li, W.; Zhang,
Z.; Xiao, D.; Zhang, X. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3498. (e) Shin, S.;
RajanBabu, T. V. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1229.
(9) Saito, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Morita, Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1985, 33,
5284. While our paper was being readied for publication, Reetz reported
the glucose-derived monophosphites 5a,b and 6a,b and their use in enol
esters hydrogenation. See: Reetz, M. T.; Goossen, L. J.; Meiswinkel, A.;
Paetzold, J.; Jensen, J. F. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3099.
(10) For review of monosaccharide-derived chiral ligands, see: Hale,
K. J. In Rodd’s Chemistry of Carbon Compounds, 2nd ed.; Sainsbury, M.,
Ed.; Elsevier Science: New York, 1993; Suppl. 2, Vol. IE/F/G, Chapter
23b, p 273.
(11) For ketal moiety influence on the catalyst’s activity, see: Nordin,
S. J. M.; Roth, P.; Tarnai, T.; Alonso, D. A.; Brandt, P.; Andersson, P. G.
Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 1431.
(12) (a) Hockett, R. C.; Miller, R. E.; Scattergood, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1949, 71, 3072. (b) James, K.; Tatchell, A. R.; Ray, P. K. J. Chem. Soc. C
1967, 2681. (c) Singh, P. P.; Gharia, M. M.; Dasgupta, F.; Srivastava, H.
C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 439. (d) Wang, Z. X.; Tu, Y.; Frohn, M.; Zhang,
J. R.; Shi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11224.
Figure 2.
4138
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 22, 2003