3
major diastereoisomer in most cases (4b-4d and 4f-4h). The
trans-selectivity ranged from 2.9:1 for 4b up to 13.2:1 for 4h.
This assignment of stereochemistry was again based on the
coupling constants of the two protons of the β-lactam ring which
were ~2.1 Hz in the trans-diastereoisomers (J = ~5.1 Hz for cis-
diastereoisomers). In addition, the spectroscopic data obtained for
compounds 4c and 4d were consistent with those reported in the
literature for these compounds.35-37 The one exception to the
trans-selectivity trend was the 2-thiophene-substituted product 4e
We found that
a
cyclic imine derived from
1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline was also a suitable substrate with
novel product 4o isolated as solely the trans-β-lactam. Finally, a
C-alkyl substituted imine was explored. The resultant product 4p
was isolated in relatively low yield, but again, with the trans-β-
lactam as the major diastereoisomer.
In summary we have developed a T3P-mediated synthesis of
β-lactams from imines and aryl-substituted acetic acids. In the
majority of cases investigated the reactions are high yielding and
provide the trans-β-lactam as the major diastereoisomer. This is
complementary to T3P-mediated methods using heteroatom-
substituted acetic acids which give predominantly cis-β-lactams.
which was isolated as
a 1:1.7 trans:cis mixture. The
trans-selectivity observed in most cases might be explained by
existing diastereoselectivity models.12 Vaid and Zarei found that
cis-β-lactams were the major diastereoisomers when the
carboxylic acid was α-substituted with a heteroatom. It is
possible that the presence of this heteroatom aids a direct ring-
closure of the zwitterionic intermediate, leading to the
cis-products. In our case it is possible that the intermediate
undergoes isomerisation before ring-closure, thus leading to
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the EPSRC for postdoctoral support (G.C.,
EP/J016128/1), the University of York for support (W.P.U), and
Euticals for the generous donation of T3P. We are also grateful to
Dr Adrian C. Whitwood (University of York) for X-ray
crystallography.
predominantly
diastereoisomers.12
the
trans-β-lactams
as
the
major
The trans-selectivity continued when the imine scope was
investigated (Table 2, 4i-4p). The acid component for these
reactions was 3,4-dimethoxyphenylacetic acid and the required
acyclic imines were synthesized by reaction of the appropriate
amine with the appropriate aldehyde in CH2Cl2 with MgSO4 (see
Supporting Information for experimental details). 4-Methoxy-N-
[(E)-phenylmethylidene]aniline was a successful substrate as
product 4i was isolated in 83% yield and with exclusive
formation of the trans-product. A small selection of N-allyl
imines differing in the nature of the C-substitution were next
investigated and these gave the β-lactam products in high yields
(4j-4n). The trans:cis ratios ranged from 2:1 (4l), through 5.4:1
(4m) and 8:1 (4n), up to trans only (4j and 4k).
References and notes
1. For a review, see: The Organic Chemistry of β-Lactams; Georg,
G. I., Ed.; Verlag Chemie: New York, 1993.
2. King, A. M.; Reid-Yu, S. A.; Wang, W.; King, D. T.; De Pascale,
G.; Strynadka, N. C.; Walsh, T. R.; Coombes, B. K.; Wright, G.
D. Nature 2014, 510, 503–506.
3. Broccolo, F.; Cainelli, G.; Caltabiano, G.; Cocuzza, C. E. A.;
Fortuna, C. G.; Galletti, P.; Giacomini, D.; Musumarra, G.;
Musumeci, R.; Quintavalla, A. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 2804–
2811.
4. D’hooghe, M.; Mollet, K.; De Vreese, R.; Jonckers, T. H. M.;
Dams, G.; De Kimpe, N. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 5637–5641.
5. D’hooghe, M.; Dekeukeleire, S.; Mollet, K.; Lategan, C.; Smith,
P. J.; Chibale, K.; De Kimpe, N. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 4058–
4062.
Table 2. T3P-mediated formation of β-lactams, imine scope
6. Pitts, C. R.; Lectka, T. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 7930–7953.
7. Tuba, R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 5976–5988.
8. Magriotis, P. A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 2647–2657.
9. Staudinger, H. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1907, 356, 51–123.
10. Fu, N.; Tidwell, T. T. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 10465–10496.
11. Cossío, F. P.; Arrieta, A.; Sierra, M. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41,
925–936.
12. Jiao, L.; Liang, Y.; Xu, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6060–
6069.
13. Lynch, J. E.; Riseman, S. M.; Laswell, W. L.; Volante, R. P.;
Smith, G. B.; Shinkai, I.; Tschaen, D. M. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54,
3792–3796.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
14. Bose, A. K.; Spiegelman, G.; Manhas, M. S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1971, 12, 3167–3170.
15. Amin, S. G.; Glazer, R. D.; Manhas, M. S. Synthesis 1979, 210–
213.
16. Georg, G. I.; Mashava, P. M.; Guan, X. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991,
32, 581–584.
17. Miyake, M.; Tokutake, N.; Kirisawa, M. Synthesis 1983, 833–835.
18. Bose, A. K.; Manhas, M. S.; Amin, S. G.; Kapur, J. C.; Kreder, J.;
Mukkavilli, L.; Ram, B.; Vincent, J. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979,
20, 2771–2774.
N
N
O
N
O
O
(±)-4j
O
(±)-4k
62% trans only
(±)-4i
83% trans only
75% trans only
O2N
O
NC
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
O
N
O
N
19. Zarei, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014, 55, 5354–5357.
20. Basavaprabhu; Narendra, N.; Lamani, R. S.; Sureshbabu, V. V.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 3002–3005.
O
(±)-4l
93% 2:1 trans:cis
(±)-4m
(±)-4n
97% 8:1 trans:cis
89% 5.4:1 trans:cis
21. Nagendra, G.; Madhu, C.; Vishwanatha, T. M.; Sureshbabu, V. V.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 5059–5063.
O
O
22. Vasantha, B.; Hemantha, H. P.; Sureshbabu, V. V. Synthesis 2010,
2990–2996.
O
O
23. Dunetz, J. R.; Xiang, Y.; Baldwin, A.; Ringling, J. Org. Lett.
2011, 13, 5048–5051.
N
N
O
O
24. Augustine, J. K.; Vairaperumal, V.; Narasimhan, S.; Alagarsamy,
P.; Radhakrishnan, A. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 9989–9996.
25. Jose, G.; Suresha Kumara, T. H.; Nagendrappa, G.; Sowmya, H.
B. V.; Jasinski, J. P.; Millikan, S. P.; Chandrika, N.; More, S. S.;
Harish, B. G. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 77, 288–297.
(±)-4o
61% trans only
(±)-4p
30% 3.8:1 trans:cis