implement a function in our helicates. In this paper, we report
on the synthesis of an immobilized enantiomerically pure
bis(chelating) ligand strand that could be used in a proof of
principle study for the resolution of a similar racemic
bis(chelating) ligand through liquid chromatography (LC)
presumably via diastereoselective helicate formation.
In order to prepare the boronated polystyrene, we followed
a procedure described by Hodge and Zhang. Bio-Beads S-X
6
1 from BIO-RAD was chosen as the starting material. After
cleaning of the commercial polymeric material following a
7
procedure described by Fr e´ chet and Farrall, the boronic acid
6
,8
function was introduced into the polystyrene backbone.
-Ethynyl-2,2′-bipyridine could be prepared in five steps
starting from 2-aminopyridine using a modified Negishi
5
8
,9
reaction as the key step.
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of Immobilized
The most effort, however, had to be spent on the synthesis
of the BINOL building block. As a first step, enantiomerically
pure (M)-BINOL was desymmetrized by introducing a
bromine substituent at the 6-position of the BINOL following
Bis(bipyridine) BINOL Ligand (M)-1
1
0
an approach of Cai et al.: one of the hydroxyl functions of
the BINOL was transformed into a pivaloyl ester. The bulky
ester group largely prevents acylation of the second hydroxyl
group due to steric hindrance. Thus, we obtained the desired
monoester in 91% yield and only 9% of the readily
crystallizing diester. Due to the deactivating ester group,
electrophilic bromination in dichloromethane at -78 °C
occurred only at the other naphthalene unit. After that, the
ester was saponified with sodium hydroxide solution and the
reactive hydroxyl functions were protected as methoxymethyl
ethers by a Williamson ether synthesis with methoxymethyl
8
,11
chloride ((M)-2).
Since the BINOL building block still needed to be
furnished with the two bipyridine units which we decided
to introduce before we immobilized the whole ligand on the
polymer, the bromine had to be masked in order to make
the following transformations regioselective. For this purpose,
To immobilize our ligand on a polymer gel, we had to
choose a suitable position to introduce an additional func-
tional group into the ligand structure that would allow us to
covalently link our ligand to the polymer. We decided to
use the 6-position of the BINOL-core for this purpose for
two reasons: First, it is far away from the bipyridines and
should not interfere with metal binding. Second, it can be
selectively addressed by an electrophilic attack. As shown
in Scheme 1, the synthesis of the immobilized ligand needed
three building blocks: a polystyrene furnished with boronic
acid ester groups, a protected BINOL equipped with (masked)
12
we adopted a protocol by Kobayashi et al. and exchanged
the bromine for a trimethylsilyl group affording BINOL (M)-
3
. (M)-3 was then lithiated in the 3,3′-position making use
of the ortho-directing effect of the acetal protecting groups
and subsequently quenched with iodine solution to give the
diiodinated building block ((M)-4) needed for the Sonogash-
ira coupling with 5-ethynyl-2,2′-bipyridine (5) (Scheme 2).
(
M)-4 and 5 were then coupled in a 2-fold Sonogashira
reaction to give (M)-6 in an excellent yield of 90% (Scheme
).
The next task was an ipso-substitution of the trimethylsilyl
group at the 6-position of the BINOL using iodine monochlo-
3
1
2
halide functions (X , X ), and an ethynylated 2,2′-bipyridine
that are coupled sequentially via cross-coupling procedures.
1
2
ride in order to reactivate this position for the final Suzuki
reaction. Interestingly, this turned out to be the most
challenging step in our synthesis. Optimization of the reaction
conditions finally allowed quantitative conversion of (M)-6
to the desired iodide (M)-7 without any byproducts (Scheme
(3) Some recent reviews about stereoselective self-assembly of supramo-
lecular aggregates: (a) Spector, M. S.; Selinger, J. V.; Schnur, J. M. Top.
Stereochem. 2003, 24, 281. (b) Hamilton, T. D.; MacGillivray, L. R. Cryst.
Growth Design 2004, 4, 419. (c) Mateos-Timoneda, M. A.; Crego-Calama,
M.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2004, 33, 363. (d) Supramolecular
Chirality: Crego-Calama, M.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Top. Curr. Chem. 2006,
3
).
2
65. (e) Lee, S. L.; Lin, W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 521. For a more
comprehensive list of references on the diastereoselective self-assembly of
helicates, see references in: (f) Bunzen, J.; Bruhn, T.; Bringmann, G.; L u¨ tzen,
A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3621, and ref 1i.
(6) Yuan, X.-Y.; Li, H.-Y.; Hodge, P.; Kilner, M.; Tastard, C. Y.; Zhang,
Z.-P. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2006, 17, 2401.
(
4) Review: (a) Hannon, M. J. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2007, 36, 280. Some
(7) Farrall, M. J.; Frechet, J. M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 3877.
recent examples: (b) Malina, J.; Hannon, M. J.; Brabec, V. Chem.sEur. J.
007, 13, 3871. (c) Pascu, G. I.; Hotze, A. C. G.; Sanchez-Cano, C.; Kariuki,
(8) See the Supporting Information for details.
2
(9) L u¨ tzen, A.; Hapke, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 2292. (b) Kiehne,
U.; Bunzen, J.; Staats, H.; L u¨ tzen, A. Synthesis 2007, 1061. (c) Hapke, M.;
B. M.; Hannon, M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4374. (d) McDonell,
U.; Kerchoffs, J. M. C. A.; Castineiras, R. P. M.; Hicks, M. R.; Hotze,
A. C. G.; Hannon, M. J.; Rodger, A. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton. Trans. 2008,
Brandt, L.; L u¨ tzen, A. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2008, 37, 2782
(10) Cai, D.; Larsen, R. D.; Reider, P. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43,
4055.
(11) Bai, X.-L.; Liu, X.-D.; Wang, M.; Kang, C.-Q.; Gao, L.-X. Synthesis
.
6
3
1
67. (e) Malina, J.; Hannon, M. J.; Brabe, V. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36,
630. (f) Malina, J.; Hannon, M. J.; Brabec, V. Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14,
0408.
2005, 458
.
(
5) L u¨ tzen, A.; Hapke, M.; Griep-Raming, J.; Haase, D.; Saak, W.
(12) Yamashita, Y.; Ishitani, H.; Shimizu, H.; Kobayashi, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3292.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2086.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 21, 2009
4787