Angewandte
Chemie
As d-GulNAc deacetylase activity has not previously
and UDP-d-GlcNAc as substrates. To our delight, although
been observed, we sought to characterize StnI in vitro. We
the reaction was slow, a new product was detected by HPLC
analysis of an overnight assay. HR-ESI-MS analysis revealed
purified the N-His -tagged StnI (see Figure S10 in the
6
+
Supporting Information) and tested its deacetylase activity
by incubating the enzyme with 5 or 6. HPLC analyses
revealed no conversion of 5, but a new product was detected
when using 6 as a substrate (Figure 2A). The chemical
its chemical formula is C H N O (m/z 374.1675 [M+H] ,
1
4
23
5
7
calcd 374.1676), consistent with the expected product 8
(Figure 2B and see S13B in the Supporting Information).
We then examined StnG activity towards UDP-d-GulNAc
(synthesized as described in the Supporting Information) and
UDP-N-acetyl-d-galactosamine (UDP-d-GalNAc).
Although no reaction occurred when using the former
substrate, which indicates that the STN d-GulNAc moiety is
formed after glycosyl transfer, the effective conversion of 4
into a new product 9 was observed with the latter substrate
(
Figure 2B). Compound 9 shares the same chemical formula
+
C H N O as 5 and 8 (HR-ESI-MS m/z 374.1664 [M+H] ,
1
4
23
5
7
calcd 374.1676; see Figure S13D in the Supporting Informa-
tion), but could be clearly differentiated by careful HPLC
analysis (see Figure S16D in the Supporting Information).
The reaction conditions of StnG were then optimized using 4
and UDP-d-GalNAc as substrates (see Figure S14 in the
Supporting Information). Steady-state kinetic analyses under
the optimized conditions (pH 8.0, 308C with 0.05 mm Mn )
revealed Michaelis–Menten behavior for all substrates, and
the resulting steady-state kinetic constants clearly demon-
strate a strong preference of UDP-d-GalNAc over UDP-d-
GlcNAc as the sugar donor for StnG (Table 1 and see
Figure 2. HPLC analysis of representative assays of StnI (A) and StnG
(
B). i) 6 standard; ii) 6 + StnI; iii) 6 + denatured StnI; iv) 4 standard;
v) 4 + UDP-GlcNAc + StnG; vi) 4 + UDP-GalNAc + StnG; vii) 4 +
UDP-GulNAc + StnG; viii) 4 + UDP-GalNAc + denatured StnG.
Detection at 190 nm.
2
+
formula of the new product was C H N O , the same as 3, as
1
3
22
6
7
+
determined by HR-ESI-MS (m/z 375.1607 [M+H] , calcd
75.1623; see Figure S11 in the Supporting Information).
3
Table 1: StnG kinetic parameters for different substrates.
These results suggest that StnQ first carbamoylates the d-
GulNAc moiety of 5 to form 6, which is then deacetylated by
StnI to generate 3. Significantly, as all the previously
characterized LmbE family deacetylases catalyze the deace-
[
a]
Toward UDP-GlcNAc and UDP-GalNAc as Donors
À1
À1 À1
Donor
Km [mm]
kcat [min
]
kcat/Km [s m ]
UDP-GlcNAc
UDP-GalNAc
1.15Æ0.12
0.27Æ0.03
3.2Æ0.31
72.2Æ6.9
46.4Æ4.8
3
[13]
4.46ꢀ10 Æ412
tylation of N-acetyl-d-glucosamine (d-GlcNAc),
expands the substrate spectrum of this enzyme family.
StnI
[
b]
Given that the d-GulNAc moiety exists in both 5 and 6,
we speculated that d-GlcNAc, the acetylated derivative of the
identified precursor d-GlcN, is a precursor of STN biosyn-
Toward 4 as an Acceptor
À1
À1 À1
Acceptor
Km [mm]
kcat [min
]
kcat/Km [s
m ]
3
4
0.42Æ0.04
86.7Æ8.5
3.44ꢀ10 Æ347
1
3
thesis. To validate this hypothesis, N-[1,2- C ]-d-GlcNAc was
2
[a] With saturating 4 (6 mm) as the acceptor. [b] With saturating UDP-
fed to the DstnI mutant CIM1008. As anticipated, N-[1,2-
GalNAc (5 mm) as the donor.
1
3
C ]-d-GlcNAc was incorporated into 6 efficiently when
2
analyzed by MS (see Figure S12 in the Supporting Informa-
tion), thereby proving the intermediacy of d-GlcNAc in the
biosynthesis of the d-GulNAc moiety.
Figure S15 in the Supporting Information). UDP-d-GalNAc
is also abundant in Streptomyces, and normally originates
from UDP-d-GlcNAc through UDP-d-GlcNAc 4-epimerase
(e.g. SCO3137 and SCO2988 in S. coelicolor M145). Conse-
quently, we propose that StnG attaches d-GalNAc to the
guanidine of 4 to form 9, which is then converted into 5 by an
epimerase.
As sugars are typically activated to NDP sugars by
a nucleotidyltransferase prior to GT-catalyzed installation
[
14]
on an aglycone, we proposed that StnG recuits an NDP
sugar from primary metabolism because: 1) no nucleotidyl-
transferase-encoding gene exists in the stn cluster; and 2) the
stn cluster can be expressed in different heterologous hosts
Most GTs involved in secondary metabolite biosynthesis
[7]
[15]
including S. coelicolor and Streptomyces albus, which sug-
gests that the substrate of StnG is an NDP sugar common in
Streptomyces. The identification of d-GlcNAc as a precursor
of STNs implicates UDP-d-GlcNAc as a potential substrate,
which is one component of the ubiquitous peptidylglycoside
comprising the cell wall of the Gram-positive bacteria
Streptomyces.
belong to the GT-B family, which possess one domain for
NDP-sugar binding and another for aglycone recognition. In
contrast, the GT-A family enzymes are single-domain pro-
[
15]
teins, and to our knowledge ValG is the only characterized
GT-A fold GT involved in secondary metabolite biosynthesis.
While ValG is an O-GT that adds d-glucose to validoxyl-
[
16]
amine to form validamycin,
StnG represents the first
To verify the proposed activity of StnG toward UDP-d-
reported GT-A fold N-GT involved in secondary metabolite
biosynthesis, and furthermore catalyzes the unprecedented
attachment of a sugar to the imine nitrogen atom of
GlcNAc, we purified N-His -tagged StnG (see Figure S10 in
6
the Supporting Information) and incubated the enzyme with 4
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1 – 5
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3
These are not the final page numbers!