Gonza´lez-Nu´n˜ez et al.
SCHEME 1. Mechanistic Pathways for the
Oxygenation of Alkane C-H Bonds by
Dioxiranes 1
relative position with respect to the reacting C-H bond
also have significant effects on the rate and selectivity
of this reaction. Thus, in our study8b on the oxygenation
of the tertiary C-H bonds of a 2-substituted adamantane
model with methyl(trifluoromethyl)dioxirane (1a), we
found that the Z/E selectivity depended on the electron-
withdrawing ability of the substituent. The plot of ln
Z/E versus σI of the substituents,9 within a range of
0.15-1.07 units of σI, showed two correlation lines with
opposite slopes, which were explained8b in terms of long-
range hyperconjugative interactions of the reaction center
with the remote substituent. However, within the mecha-
nistic context, these data raise the question as to whether
the change in the slope observed could indicate a change
in the reaction mechanism induced by the increasing
electron-withdrawing ability of the remote substituent.
The validity of our interpretation8 of the dependence of
Z/E selectivity on the electron-withdrawing ability of the
remote substituent requires that we verify that the
reaction mechanism remains unchanged along a series
of substituents.
In an earlier report, Murray et al. studied10 the effect
of the substituents on the oxygenation rate of 1-substi-
tuted adamantanes with dimethyldioxirane (1b) and
found evidence to support an electrophilic mechanism.
However, the range of substituents used was relatively
narrow (0.15-0.47 units of σI), and some substituents
remarkably deviated from the trend because the
model substrate allowed through-space interaction be-
tween the substituent and the reacting center in the
transition state. These data do not allow us to conclude
that the reaction mechanism is consistent along a broader
range of electron-withdrawing substituents with the more
reactive methyl(trifluoromethyl)dioxirane (1a). Further-
more, the literature contains little systematic experi-
mental data concerning the specific influence of the
substituents and the solvent on the oxygenation of satu-
rated substrates with methyl(trifluoromethyl)dioxirane
(1a).
We report here the effect of the substituents on the
rate of the oxygenation of substituted saturated hydro-
carbons with methyl(trifluoromethyl)dioxirane (1a). The
study was performed for a series of 2-substituted ada-
mantanes, a model substrate that avoids through-space
interaction of the substituent with the reacting center,
with a series of electron-withdrawing substituents cover-
ing a range of 0.15-0.67 units of σI.9 The Hammett plot
shows a straight line with a negative slope that suggests
a significant electronic deficiency at the substrate in the
transition state and indicates that the reaction mecha-
nism remains unchanged along the whole series of
substituents. The kinetic solvent effect found in the
oxygenation of 2-adamantyl acetate (2e) with methyl-
(trifluoromethyl)dioxirane (1a) is significant and makes
it possible to disregard a radical-mediated mechanism
as the main pathway to the regular oxygenation products
in these reactions. The absence of any significant influ-
ence of the solvent on the Z/E isomer ratio allows us to
also disregard the through-space transmission of the
substituent effect.
under an inert atmosphere has led other authors4 to
propose an alternative radical-mediated mechanism for
these reactions (path b, Scheme 1). In this mechanism,
the substrate-induced homolysis of the peroxidic O-O
bond of the dioxirane is followed by a rate-determining
H-abstraction from the substrate by the dioxyl biradical.
The coupling of the radical pair within the solvent cage
(oxygen-rebound) produces the regular oxygenation prod-
ucts, while the escape of the alkyl radical to the solution
gives rise to the minor products, esters, and epoxides.
Theoretical calculations5 support both alternative reac-
tion mechanisms as feasible reaction pathways for the
oxygenation of saturated C-H bonds with dioxiranes.
Raouk et al.5c also suggested that both concerted and
stepwise mechanisms could arise from the splitting of the
reaction pathway after a common transition state.
However, in our study6 of the reaction of saturated
hydrocarbons with dimethyldioxirane (1b), we found
differences in the kinetic isotopic effects for regular
oxygenation products (alcohols and ketones) and radical-
derived products (esters and epoxides). These results
strongly suggest a distinct mechanistic origin for each
type of product and support the notion that the concerted
reaction pathway leads to the oxygenation of saturated
C-H bonds while the molecule-induced homolysis of the
dioxirane leads to the minor radical-derived products.
The findings obtained by Schreiner et al.7 on the reaction
of propellanes with dimethyldioxirane also support the
notion that the molecule-induced homolysis pathway
plays a minor role in the oxygenation of alkanes with
dioxiranes.
Amid these conflicting reports,3-7 we have established8
that the electronic character of the substituent and its
(4) (a) Bravo, A.; Fontana, G.; Fronza, G.; Minisci, F. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1995, 1573-1574. (b) Bravo, A.; Fontana, G.; Minisci,
F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 38, 6945-6948. (c) Minisci, F.; Zhao, L.;
Fontana, F.; Bravo, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 1697-1700. (d)
Vanni, R.; Garden, S. J.; Banks, J.; Ingold, K. U. Tetrahedron Lett.
1995, 36, 7999-8002. (e) Bravo, A.; Fontana, F.; Fronza, G.; Minisci,
F.; Zhao, L. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 254-263. (f) Simakov, P. A.; Choi,
S. Y.; Newcomb, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 8187-8190.
(5) (a) Glukhovtsev, M. N.; Canepa, C.; Bach, R. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 10528-10533. (b) Du, X.; Houk, K. N. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 6480-6483. (c) Shustov, G. V.; Rauk, A. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
63, 5413-5422. (c) Freccero, M.; Gandolfi, R.; Sarzi-Amade`, M.;
Rastelli, A. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 811-823.
(6) Asensio, G.; Mello, R.; Gonza´lez-Nu´n˜ez, M. E.; Boix, C.; Royo, J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2373-2376.
(7) Fokin, A. A.; Tkachenko, B. A.; Korschunov, O. I.; Gunchenko,
P. A.; Schreiner, P. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11248-11252.
(8) (a) Gonza´lez-Nu´n˜ez, M. E.; Royo, J.; Castellano, G.; Andreu, C.;
Boix, C.; Mello, R.; Asensio, G. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 831-834. (b)
Gonza´lez-Nu´n˜ez, M. E.; Castellano, G.; Andreu, C.; Royo, J.; Ba´guena,
M.; Mello, R.; Asensio, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7487-7491.
(9) Charton, M. Prog. Phys. Org. Chem. 1981, 13, 119-251.
(10) Murray, R. W.; Gu, H. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 5673-5677.
7920 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 70, No. 20, 2005