Paul J. Dyson et al.
FULL PAPERS
then heated to the required reaction temperature and stirring
was commenced for the period required. Once the desired time
period had elapsed, the stirringwas stopped and the autoclave
allowed to cool before releasingthe pressure. Substrate and
catalyst layers were separated in a separatingfunnel.
be less active in ionic liquids than water, but in contrast
to the pre-catalyst used here, these catalysts react with
water to form the active catalyst.[20]
Experimental Section
The ionic liquids containingchloride impurities were made
accordingto the literature method [4] and then filtered through
neutral alumina prior to use. Deionised water was used without
the addition of pH buffers or phase-transfer reagents. The
chloride-free [bmim][BF4] was made usinga modified liter-
ature method (see below). The complexes [H4Ru4(h6-
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Royal Society fora Univesrity
Research Fellowship (PJD), the University of York for financial
support (DJE) and the University of Waikato for a travel grant
(WH).
and Ru(h6-C10H14)(pta)Cl2 were made ac-
[13a]
[21]
C6H6)][BF4]2
cordingto the literature procedures. All other reagents were
supplied by Aldrich and were used without further purifica-
tion.
References and Notes
Electrospray mass spectra were obtained a VG Autospec
instrument. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker DRX-
[1] a) F. H. Hurley, US Patent 2,446,331, 1948; b) F. H.
Hurley, J. Electrochem. Soc. 1951, 98, 207.
[2] a) T. Welton, Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2071; b) P. Wassersch-
ied, W. Keim, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3773; c) H.
Olivier-Bourbigou, L. Magna, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chemical
2002, 182 183, 419.
[3] J. Dupont, R. F. de Souza, P. A. Z. Suarez, Chem. Rev., in
press.
[4] K. R. Seddon, A. Stark, M.-J. Torres, Pure Appl. Chem.
2000, 72, 2275.
1
400 spectrometer with H at 400.13, 31P at 161.98 and 13C at
100.1 MHz. 1H NMR chemical shifts are reported in ppm
relative to residual 1H signals in the deuterated solvents
(CDCl3, d 7.29), 31P{1H} NMR spectra are reported in ppm
downfield of an external 85% solution of phosphoric acid. All
hydrogenation products were analysed by NMR and/or gas
chromatography using a Varian gas chromatograph with a
capillary carbowax column (30 m) usinginjection, oven and
detector temperatures 10 30 8C above the boilingpoints of
the substrate/product beingstudied.
[5] For example, see:, P. A. Z. Suarez, S. Einloft, J. E. L.
Dullius, R. F. de Souza, J. Dupont, J. Chim. Phys. 1998,
95, 1626.
Preparation of Chloride-Free [bmim][BF4]
[6] a) S. J. Wilkes, M. Zaworotko, Chem. Commun. 1990,
965; b) J. Fuller, R. T. Carlin, H. C. De Long, D. Ha-
worth, Chem. Commun. 1994, 299.
[7] R. F. de Souza, V. Rech, J. Dupont, Adv. Synth. Catal.
2002, 344, 153.
[8] a) R. Sheldon, Chem. Commun. 2001, 2399; b) Y. Chau-
vin, L. Mussman, H. Olivier, Agnew. Chem. Int. Ed.
Engl. 1995, 34, 2698.
[9] P. J. Dyson, D. J. Ellis, D. G. Parker, T. Welton, Chem.
Commun. 1999, 25.
[10] P. A. Z. Suarez, J. E. L. Dullius, S. Einloft, R. F. de Sou-
za, J. Dupont, Polyhedron 1996, 15, 1217.
[11] B. Cornils, W. A. Herrmann, J. Mol. Catal. 1997, 116, 27.
[12] J. D. Holbrey, A. E. Visser, R. D. Rogers, Solubility and
Solvation in Ionic Liquids, in Ionic Liquids in Synthesis,
(Eds.: P. Wasserscheid, T. Welton), VCH-Wiley, Wein-
heim, 2002.
1-Butylimidazole (5 mL) was added dropwise to a rapidly
stirred sample of trimethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate (1 mol
equiv.) cooled to À 78 8C over a period of 10 min. After the
initial vigorous evolution of gas had ceased, the reaction
mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature. Any
residual dimethyl ether by-product was removed under high
vacuum. The product was passed through activated charcoal
and alumina columns to afford colourless [bmim][BF4] ionic
liquid in quantitative yield.
Spectroscopic data for [bmim][BF4]: ESMS : m/z 139
[bmim] ; ESMSÀ: m/z 87 [BF4]À; 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 8.76
(s, 1H), 7.51 (m, 2H), 4.24 (q, J 4.24 Hz, 2H), 3.99 (s, 3H), 1.90
(quintet, J 7.28 Hz, 2H), 1.39 (sextet, J 7.28 Hz, 2H), 0.97 (t,
J 7.28 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (DEPT, CDCl3): d 135.46 (CH),
123.23 (CH), 121.94 (CH), 49.92 (CH2), 35.50 (CH3), 31.31
(CH2), 18.86 (CH2), 12.72 (CH3) ppm; anal.: found (calcd.) C
41.44 (42.51) H 7.33 (6.69) N 12.03 (12.39) Cl 0.00 (0.00)%.
[13] A. J. Carmichael, K. R. Seddon, J. Phys. Org. Chem.
2000, 13, 591.
Hydrogenation Reactions
[14] a) G. Meister, G. Rheinwald, H. Stoecki-Evans, G. S¸ss-
Fink, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1994, 3215; b) L.
Plasseraud, G. S¸ss-Fink, J. Organomet. Chem. 1997, 539,
163; c) E. G. Fidalgo, L. Plasseraud, G. S¸ss-Fink, G. J.
Mol. Catal. A: Chemical 1998, 132, 5.
[15] A. Berger, R. F. de Souza, M. R. Delgado, J. Dupont,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 1825.
[16] P. J. Dyson, D. J. Ellis, G. Laurenczy, Adv. Synth. Catal.
2003, 345, 211.
All hydrogenations were carried out in a Parr stainless steel
autoclave (300 mL) fitted with a PTFE liner. The catalyst was
added directly to the autoclave and the solvent was added. The
autoclave was then sealed and purged with nitrogen and the
reaction substrate was then added through the liquid inlet port
via a syringe. The autoclave was then purged thoroughly with
hydrogen gas (99.9995% purity) and the appropriate reaction
pressure was then set at room temperature. The autoclave was
220
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 216 221