Replacement of dichloromethane by more coordinating
solvents, such as acetonitrile, gave moderately lower partition
coefficients. Experiments to determine the minimum number
of fluorine atoms in the urea component to attain an efficient
partition indicated that less fluorinated ureas 4a and 4b gave
unsatisfactory values with either medium-sized (complex
4a‚5a) or long-sized perfluoroalkanoic acids (complex
4a‚5d). On the other hand, perfluoroheptanoic acid 5a was
also more efficient than their pony-tailed counterparts 5b or
5c bearing, respectively, one or two methylene spacers and
also than long-sized acid 5d. Urea/acid 1:1 complexes were
isolable waxy solids or viscous liquids. For instance, 4c‚5a
was a stable noncrystalline solid at room temperature but
dissociated slowly on heating under vacuum (90 °C/10-4
Torr; 4 h) allowing the quantitative recovery of the pure urea
4c (98%) and the sublimated perfluoroheptanoic acid 5a
(96%).
of the acid 5a, the autoaggregation of urea 4c, and the
formation of complex 4c‚5a. Urea 4c was present in CH2-
Cl2 essentially as a nonassociated species [3451 cm-1 (N-
H); 1686 cm-1 (CONH amide-I); 1540 cm-1 (CONH amide-
II)]. In C6F14, however, no free urea could be detected and
the N-H and CdO amide-I bands shifted to lower frequen-
cies [3371 cm-1 and 3324 cm-1 (N-H); 1630 cm-1 (CONH
amide-I)], while the CONH amide-II band appeared at higher
frequencies (1575 cm-1), consistent with the formation of
CdO‚‚‚H-N autoaggregation bindings.
A 1:1 mixture of 4c and 5a in CH2Cl2 showed, in addition
to the peaks previously mentioned, three strong bands in the
carbonyl region [1752 cm-1 (CdO of 5a, associated with
the urea NH); 1640 cm-1 (CONH amide-I), 1563 cm-1
(CONH amide-II)], assigned to 4c‚5a. In C6F14 a similar
behavior was observed, but the free 4c carbonyl band could
not be detected, indicating that the equilibrium was com-
pletely shifted to 4c‚5a. Furthermore, a new band at 3482
cm-1 appeared, which was consistent with the free N-H
stretching band present in 4c‚5a.17
Even though the precise nature of the urea-acid hydrogen
bindings is not fully clear at present, a FTIR comparative
analysis (Scheme 3) of 5 × 10-3 M solutions of 4c, 5a, and
To check the efficiency of this new separation technique
for “fluorous synthesis”, some exploratory reactions based
on the use of the dehydrated carbodiimide counterpart of
the urea 4c were investigated (Scheme 4). Carbodiimide 618
Scheme 3
Scheme 4a
a (a) Ph3PBr2, NEt3, CH2Cl2/C6F14; (b) 6, H2NR2; (c) 6, HOtBu,
DMAP (0.1 equiv). PMP: C6H4OMe-p.
was a stable and storable liquid, conveniently prepared by
the reaction of urea 4c with triphenylbromophosphonium
bromide and triethylamine19 in a CH2Cl2/C6F14 biphasic
(14) Crystalline adducts of linear oligomers of Nylon-6 precipitated from
trifloroethanol solution with perfluoroglutaric acid, but not with nonfluori-
nated diacids. See: Aharoni, S. M.; Wasserman, E. Macromolecules 1982,
15, 20-25.
(15) Trabelsi, H.; Szo¨nyi, F.; Michelangeli, N.; Cambon, A. J. Fluorine
Chem. 1994, 69, 115-117. None of ureas 4a-d has been described yet.
(16) Correa, A.; Denis, J.-N.; Greene, A. E. Synth. Commun. 1991, 21,
1-9.
(17) Application of the NMR titration method allowed the estimation of
a weak association constant (Ka ) 37 M-1; 25 °C) for 4c‚5a in CD2Cl2
observing the shift of the NH protons in fast dynamic exchange [δ(4c) )
4.53 ppm; δ(4c‚5a)) 5.01 ppm], whereas the autoaggregated nature of 4c
in C6F14 (CDCl3 as external standard) prevented from a reliable determi-
nation of Ka for 4c‚5a. In both solvents, no formation of complexes of
higher stoichiometry than 1:1 could be detected when an excess of 5a was
added. For methods of determination of association constants by NMR,
see: Fielding, L. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 6151-6170.
1:1 mixtures of 4c and 5a showed that changing the solvent
from CH2Cl2 to C6F14 dramatically enhanced the dimerization
(12) Fully fluorocarbon-soluble coordination complexes of Mn(II) per-
fluorocarboxylates and perfluorinated triamines have been described
recently. See: Vincent, J.-M.; Rabion, A.; Yachandra, V. K.; Fish, R. H.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2346-2349.
(13) For reviews, see: (a) Mikolajczyk, M.; Kielbasinski, P. Tetrahedron
1981, 37, 233-284. (b) Williams, A.; Ibrahim, I. T. Chem. ReV. 1981, 81,
589-636.
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 15, 2001
2363