Scheme 1
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions for I2-Catalyzed
Hydroperoxidation of 3-Decanone 4 with 30% aq H2O2
n (mmol)
entry
4
H2O2
I2
concd 4 (M) time (h) conv. (%)a
only by ozonolysis8,9 and by hydroperoxide rearrangement
of selected bicyclic alcohols.18 Drawbacks of these methods
are the need for the prior synthesis of the starting substrates,
the use of highly concentrated H2O2, the need for excess
acid, moderate yields, and the restricted substrate range. In
addition, the selectivity of ozonolysis is poor and cannot be
used for substrates containing ozone-sensitive groups. Be-
cause of these limitations, new, more efficient, and broad
spectrum methods for the synthesis of DHPs are sought.
Our goal was to find a new approach to synthesize DHPs,
starting directly from the carbonyl compound, using com-
mercially available 30% H2O2 while avoiding the use of an
acid if possible. Because molecular iodine has proven a
useful Lewis acid catalyst for the activation of carbonyl
compounds, including for acetalization reactions,19-21 we
envisaged that iodine would benefit the peroxidation reac-
tions of such compounds.
An acid and methyltrioxorhenium (MTO) catalyzed reac-
tion of 4-substituted cyclohexanones with 30% H2O2 in
trifluoroethanol (TFE) led to the formation of tetraoxanes,
but only in the case of 4-methylcyclohexanone does a similar
reaction without acid yield gem-dihydroperoxide.3,22 Using
I2 instead of (MTO), we performed the reaction with 4-tert-
butyl cyclohexanone 1 in TFE using 10 mol % of I2 as the
catalyst. DHP 2 was formed in 80% yield as determined from
the 1H NMR spectra of the crude reaction mixture. We also
investigated whether the use of TFE in combination with I2
was a requirement of whether other solvents could be used.
Therefore, reactions of 1 with 3 equiv of 30% aq H2O2 and
10 mol % of molecular iodine in different solvents and
without a solvent were performed. After 24 h at room
temperature in water, in N,N-dimethylformamide, and with-
out solvent, the reactions were not selective and yielded
varying mixtures of hydroperoxides with low conversion
(48%, 55%, and 13%). Surprisingly, the reaction in aceto-
nitrile gave 90% of DHP 2 in the crude reaction mixture
(Scheme 1). The reaction in methanol was also selective,
but instead of DHP, the monoperoxy ketal 3 was formed in
78% yield (70% after isolation). Given this, acetonitrile was
deemed the optimal solvent for the synthesis of DHPs and
further optimization of the reaction was made in this solvent.
Because the synthesis of acyclic DHPs is more problematic
than that of cyclohexyl DHPs, we selected 3-decanone 4 as
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
4
4
4
4
4
10
10
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
5
24
24
24
24
67
24
67
22
31
27
13
81
59
59
61
a Conversions to DHP determined from 1H NMR spectra of the crude
reaction mixture.
a test compound to determine the optimal reaction conditions.
The amount of I2 and H2O2, the reaction time, and the
concentration of the reagents were varied. The reaction
conditions, which worked well for the synthesis of the
peroxide 2, resulted in a low conversion (22%) of 4 into the
dihydroperoxide 5 (Table 1, entry 1), and further modification
of the conditions was required to enhance the yield. Table 1
shows how an increase in the amount of H2O2 and an
extended reaction time (24 h) resulted in an increased yield
of DHP 5 (entry 2), whereas an increase in the amount of I2
decreased the yield (entries 3 and 4). Further dilution of the
reaction mixture brought about a significant improvement
in the conversion of ketone 4 to DHP. In a 0.1 M solution
of ketone 4 (entry 5), the conversion was 50% higher than
in a 0.5 M solution. A reaction time of 67 h (entry 6) did
not bring about any further improvement. On the contrary,
it lowered the conversion to DHP, which is probably due to
its decomposition with time. A supplementary increase in
the amount of H2O2 (entry 7) resulted in a deterioration of
conversion (lower yield) to DHP 5.
The best results for the synthesis of DHP 5 were achieved
using a 0.1 M solution of ketone 4 in acetonitrile, 4 equiv
of 30% aq H2O2, and 10 mol % of I2 at room temperature
for 24 h. To determine the limitations of the method, we
tested the efficiency of this transformation on various
cycloalkanones, acyclic ketones, and aldehydes.
Table 2 gives the results obtained for cyclic ketones.
Cyclohexanones show the highest reactivity requiring only
5 h for an efficient conversion to DHPs. Conversion of Me-
substituted cyclohexanones was affected by the steric
environment around the reaction site, as the yield decreased
from 98% for 4-Me-cyclohexyl DHP 12 to 93% for 3-Me
10 and to 80% for 2-Me 8. Also, 4-t-Bu-cyclohexanone 1,
cycloheptanone 14, cyclododecanone 16, and androstane-
3,17-dione 20 were converted to DHP in good yields, and
the cyclopentyl 6 and 2-adamantyl 18 dihydroperoxides
required a higher reaction concentration to be formed
efficiently.
(18) Hamann, H. J.; Liebscher, J. Synlett 2001, 96.
(19) Basu, M. K.; Samajdar, S.; Becker, F. F.; Banik, B. K. Synlett 2002,
319.
(20) Karimi, B.; Golshani, B. Synthesis 2002, 784.
(21) Banik, B. K.; Chapa, M.; Marquez, J.; Cardona, M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2005, 46, 2341.
(22) Zmitek, K.; Stavber, S.; Zupan, M.; Bonnet-Delpon, D.; Iskra, J.
Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 1479.
2492
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 12, 2006