C. Bolchi et al.
Carbohydrate Research 499 (2021) 108229
or in DMSO, but here, the preferential formation of diacetonides over the
other acetals is more pronounced and what is more with a much larger
prevalence of the desired diacetonide 1.
We think that a key role in determining the efficiency (high con-
version into diacetonides) and the selectivity (high yield of the diac-
etonide 1) of the procedure is the combination of a polar aprotic solvent
with a heterogeneous solid catalyst such as Aquivion-H. In less polar
aprotic solvents, such as acetonitrile, glyme, ethyl acetate or acetone,
the Aquivion-H catalyzed acetonidation led to triacetals as the main
products, as indicated by the almost exclusive presence of singlets im-
putable to the geminal methyls of the 1,2:3,4:5,6 triacetonide in the
most upfield region of the 1H NMR spectra of the crudes and by the
concomitant absence, at lower field, of the diagnostic signals for 1,
namely those of the two hydroxylated methines. On the other side, DMF,
in which the solubility of mannitol at room temperature is low but not
null as in the above less polar solvents, can ensure a supply of dissolved
substrate proportioned to the turnover frequency of the catalysts, which
is, as desirable, lower than that of soluble acids such as p-TsOH or
H2SO4. In this heterogeneous catalysis, other key aspects able of
modulating the reactivity of the species involved are the more difficult
accessibility to the catalytic sites by the reactants, reasonably varying
with their acetonidation extent, and the amphiphilic nature of the
polimer Aquivion-H favouring the reactivity of a highly hydrophilic
substrate, such as mannitol, in a non-aqueous environment. The synergy
of these factors allows a fine control of the reaction and tunes the re-
action selectivity. Evaluation of the individual weigh of such factors
would imply further ad hoc investigations. However, our statements are
supported by the negative or less positive results obtained replacing
Aquivion-H with soluble acids or DMF with solvents unable to dissolve
mannitol.
Fig. 4. Recycling of Aquivion-H: 1 yield of the first cycle and of the subsequent
five recycles.
1,3-dioxepane substructures thanks to the different shifts of the dime-
thylated acetal carbon thus revealing the undesired 4,6-acetonidation
(1,3-dioxane) and 3,6-acetonidation (1,3-dioxepane) [23]. The GC
analysis elutes, in the order, the triacetonides, the diacetyl derivatives of
the diacetonides, the tetraacetyl derivatives of the monoacetonides and,
finally, the peracetylated mannitol and furthermore it can separate the
different isomers within each group. GC analyses of the crudes from
three consecutive reactions revealed that triacetonides made up less
than 10% of the crude solid resultant from removal of the catalyst and
DMF, while the 1,2-monocetonide was present in traces and mannitol
was absent. The remainder consisted of a largely preponderant product,
namely the desired diacetonide 1. Consistently, 1H NMR spectrum of the
crudes appeared like that of a unitary product (See the 1H NMR spec-
trum of crude 1 and that of pure 1 reported in Supplementary Infor-
mation). Indeed, the revealing signals, namely those for the
hydroxylated methines and for the geminal methyls, were relatively
clean. 13C NMR spectrum showed only one signal for the dimethylated
acetal carbons, positioned at 109.4 ppm and imputable to the desired
acetonidation of vicinal diols to dioxolane rings. Furthermore, it is
noteworthy that the main impurity of the crudes was represented by less
polar triacetonides and not by the highly polar 1,2-monoacetonide. This
fact allowed us to avoid the purification of 1 by the usual crystallization
from di-n-butyl or diisopropyl ether. Simple trituration of the crudes in
more acceptable solvents, such as cyclohexane or cyclohexane and
‘green ether’ (CPME, TAME, MeTHF), recently employed by us in the
esterification of amino acids [39,40], was enough to remove the mi-
nority by-products, namely the triacetonides, which were dissolved
leaving 1 as a white solid with >98% GC purity. Indeed, when we halved
the catalyst amount, the main impurity became the 1,2-monoacetonide
and, as expectable, trituration of the crude in cyclohexane did not
remove it but enriched 1 in it. Therefore, it was necessary to wash an
ethyl acetate solution of the crude with water first and only then to
triturate the solid resultant from ethyl acetate removal in cyclohexane.
These results indicate that, in a polar aprotic solvent and under the
selected conditions, the heterogeneous catalysis by Aquivion-H can
efficiently promote diacetonidation of mannitol with almost complete
consumption of the starting material and of the intermediate mono-
acetonide and minimal formation of triacetonides. Such an output is in
line with those of the reported homogeneous catalysis by p-TsOH in DMF
The present procedure of mannitol diacetonidation catalyzed by
Aquivion-H places itself beside the recently reported Aquivion catalyzed
acetalizations of sugars with fatty alcohols to give amphiphilic alkyl
glycosides [41–43], surfactants of great interest for many desirable
intrinsic properties. There, acetalization reaction was between hydro-
philic carbonyl compounds (glucose, cellulose) and a hydrophobic
alcohol (n-dodecanol). Here, on the contrary, a highly hydrophilic
alcohol (mannitol) reacts with a hydrophobic acetalating agent (2,
2-dimethoxypropane). In both cases, due to its amphiphilic nature,
Aquivion-H proves to be able to efficiently catalyze the reaction between
substrates of very different polarity while showing, because of its
structured catalytic sites, good selectivity for a single product inside a
large series of candidate products. Among a dozen of mono-, di- and
triacetonides, Aquivion-H selectively catalyzes the formation of the
desired 1,2:5,6 diacetonide although in the presence of exceeding ace-
talating agent for moderately long time at room temperature, main-
taining such a performance unaltered through several recycles.
3. Experimental
D-Mannitol (1 g, 5.49 mmol), Aquivion-H (133 mg, 0.153 mmol), 2,2
dimethoxypropane (2.7 ml, 22.0 mmol) and 5 ml of dimethylformamide
were introduced into a round bottom flask under inert atmosphere. The
reaction mixture was vigorously stirred for 16 h at room temperature.
Afterward the suspension was filtered to remove the catalyst and the
filtrate was concentrated under vacuum to obtain a white solid crude
that was triturated in cyclohexane (15 ml). 1 was recovered by filtration
25
D
as a white solid in 76% yield (1.09 g): mp = 120.3–121.6 ◦C; [
α]
=
+2.6 (c 1, EtOH). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 4.19 (q, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 4.12 (dd, J
= 8.4 Hz and 6.4 Hz, 2H), 3.97 (dd, J = 8.4 Hz and 5.6 Hz, 2H), 3.75 (t, J
= 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.59 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 1.42 (s, 6H), 1.36 (s, 6H). 13
C
NMR (CDCl3) δ 109.4, 76.3, 71.2, 66.7, 26.7, 25.2. GC analysis of the
diacetylated derivative showed >98% purity. The catalyst removed
from the reaction mixture was rinsed with acetonitrile, dried under
vacuum, and recycled for five times.
GC analyses were conducted on samples acetylated by treatment
3