forming a second species with an isosbestic point at 310 nm. The
first order rate constant for this process, kobs, measured at 370 nm,
was 5 3 106 s21. We repeated the experiment with water-saturated
[bmim][PF6] (ca. 1.5% w/w H2O),5 which corresponds to [H2O] =
1.6 M. An identical product spectrum was observed to grow in more
rapidly (kobs = 8 3 106 s21), which strongly suggests that the final
product is [(C6H6)Cr(CO)2(H2O)]. From these data we can estimate
a bimolecular rate constant k2 ≈ 5 3 106 mol21 dm3 s21 for the
reaction of [(C6H6)Cr(CO)2(RTIL)] with water. These results
clearly show that, despite care being taken to dry the [bmim][PF6]
prior to use and minimal subsequent exposure of the samples to the
air, a relatively large amount of water was nevertheless absorbed.
Finally, we investigated the reaction of [(C6H6)Cr(CO)2(RTIL)]
with varying concentrations of acetonitrile in [bmim][PF6]. A value
of k2 = 5.8 3 106 mol21 dm3 s21was determined for displacement
of [bmim][PF6], as shown in inset (b) of Fig. 2. It should be noted
that this value is around fifty times smaller than that for a diffusion
controlled reaction in this solvent.6
In principle, both [bmim]+ and [PF6]2 ions may be initially
bound to the [(C6H6)Cr(CO)2] intermediate generated immediately
after the laser pulse. However, a blue-shifted difference spectrum
was obtained on changing the RTIL anion to [(CF3SO2)2N]2 with
an isosbestic point and depeletion at 350 and 320 nm respectively.
Furthermore, we could not displace [bmim][(CF3SO2)2N] from
[(C6H6)Cr(CO)2Solv] at an acetonitrile concentration of 5 mol
dm23 which indicates that a more strongly bound [(C6H6)Cr(CO)2-
Solv] species was now present. Taken together, these observations
suggest that binding of the [PF6]2 anion is responsible for the
spectral signature at 20 ns in Fig. 2.
This is a model catalytic system designed purely to ascertain the
relative ability of a ligand to displace an RTIL from [(C6H6)-
Cr(CO)2Solv] compared to weakly coordinated conventional
solvents. Obviously these results are most pertinent to situations
where solvent displacement by a reactant is the rate determining
step in the catalytic cycle. It is therefore extremely satisfying to
note that enhanced turn over frequencies (TOFs) have been
observed for the cationic Ni catalysed oligomerisation of ethene to
higher olefins in [bmim][PF6] compared to that in dichloromethane
and butane-1,4-diol (TOF
= 12712, 1852 and <
10 h21
respectively).7 The enhanced TOF in the RTIL was considered to
result from a combination of weak binding of [PF6]2 to the catalytic
site and decreased product solubility in this solvent. Our present
studies clearly support the former conclusion and also highlight the
importance of controlling the water content of RTILs noted by the
authors.8
In conclusion, we have unambiguously demonstrated that
[bmim][PF6] may be displaced more easily from a ‘vacant’
transition metal binding site of an organometallic complex than
even a ‘low polarity’ solvent such as C2H4Cl2 and furthermore, that
the ease of displacement can be tuned by variation of the RTIL
anion. These initial results do not correlate with ligand basicity as
measured by b values of these solvents in a simple manner.9 We are
continuing our studies into the mechanism of solvent displacement
and dependence of k2 on the Lewis basicity of the anion, and will
present a more detailed report in the near future.
We would like to thank the University of Paisley for funding a
PhD Studentship (KS).
The isosbestic points between [(C6H6)Cr(CO)2Solv] and
[(C6H6)Cr(CO)3] do not show great variation with solvent.
However, we can arrive at the approximate spectrochemical series:
C6H12 ~ [bmim][PF6] < C2H4Cl2 < CH3OH < H2O based on
isosbestic points of 380, 370–380, 370, 350 and 300 nm
respectively. In an earlier study using a Cu complex which acts as
a measure of solvent basicity, it was found that the strength of
[PF6]2 co-ordination to Cu was comparable to or slightly weaker
than dichloromethane.7 Although not overwhelming, the spectro-
scopic evidence therefore supports the following order of Cr–Solv
interaction strength: C6H12 < [bmim][PF6] < C2H4Cl2.
Notes and references
1 (a) J. D. Holbrey and K. R. Seddon, Clean Prod. Proc. I, 1999, 223; (b)
T. Welton, Chem. Rev., 1999, 2071; (c) P. Wasserscheid and W. Keim,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 3772; (d) C. M. Gordon, Appl. Catal.,
A: Gen., 2001, 222, 101; (e) D. Zhao, M. Wu, Y. Kou and M. Enze, Catal.
Today, 2002, 74, 157.
2 B. S. Creaven, M. W. George, A. C. Ginzburg, C. Hughes, J. M. Kelly,
I. M. McGrath and M. T. Pryce, Organometallics, 1993, 12, 3127.
3 For description of LFP setup see: A. C. Benniston, P. R. MacKie, L. J.
Farrugia, G. Smith, S. J. Teat and A. J. McLean, New J. Chem., 2001, 4,
58.
4 For preparation of the ionic liquid see: J. G. Huddleston, H. D. Willauer,
R. P. Swatlowski, A. E. Visser and R. D. Rogers, Chem. Commun., 1998,
1765; P. Bonhote, A. Das, N. Papageorgiou, K. Kalanasundram and M.
Gratzel, Inorg. Chem., 1996, 35, 1168.
The evidence from solvent displacement kinetics is far less
ambiguous; we find that k2 values for solvent displacement from
[(C6H6)Cr(CO)2Solv] by acetonitrile follow the trend: C6H12
>
[bmim][PF6] > C2H4Cl2. Our results show that the rate constant for
displacement of [PF6]2 from [(C6H6)Cr(CO)2Solv] by acetonitrile
is up to two orders of magnitude greater than that of the next
strongest binding solvent in our series, C2H4Cl2. Furthermore, it
should be reiterated that despite the ‘hydrophobic’ nature of
[bmim][PF6], significant concentrations of H2O can be present
even after careful drying. The result of this is that high
concentrations of displacing ligand are required in order to ensure
effective competition with displacement by H2O. Thus, water
content might represent a problem in the application of RTILs as
solvents in some catalytic systems.
5 N. V. K. Sudhir, J. F. Brennecke and A. Samanta, Chem. Commun., 2001,
413.
6 A. J. McLean, M. J. Muldoon, C. M. Gordon and I. R. Dunkin, Chem.
Commun., 2002, 1880.
7 P. Wasserscheid, C. M. Gordon, C. Hilgers, M. J. Muldoon and I. R.
Dunkin, Chem. Commun., 2001, 1186.
8 The TOF for the Ni system is much lower in [bmim][(CF3SO2)2N] than
[bmim][PF6], which is in agreement with our observations regarding ease
of solvent displacement by acetonitrile. P. Wasserscheid (personal
communication).
9 L. Crowhurst, P. Mawdsley, J. M. Perez-Arlandis, P. A. Slater and T.
Welton, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2003, 5, 2790.
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 5 9 0 – 5 9 1
591