1422
H. Mehrabi, M. Kazemi-Mireki / Chinese Chemical Letters 22 (2011) 1419–1422
Table 3
Recycling of CuO nanoparticles in the model reaction.
Run
Catalyst recovery (%)
Yield 2a (%)c
1a
2b
3b
4b
96
94
89
85
93
91
90
88
a
Reaction performed in the presence of 1a (1 mmol), malononitrile (1 mmol), 4-hydroxycoumarin (1 mmol), 15 mol% of CuO nanoparticles, and
H2O (10 mL).
b
Recovered catalyst used.
c
Yield are related to isolated pure products.
or dimethylamino group) were employed, a longer reaction time was required than those of electron-withdrawing
groups (such as nitro or halides group) on aromatic rings.
To check the recyclability of the catalyst, after completion of reaction, the reaction mixture was allowed to cool at
room temperature and the solid was filtered off and washed with water (2 mL Â 10 mL). The catalyst was recovered
from the methanol solution by centrifugation, dried under vacuum and reused for further catalytic reactions. The
catalyst maintained its good level of activity even after being recycled four times as shown in Table 3.
3. Conclusions
We have reported an efficient procedure through three-component coupling of aldehydes, malononitrile, and 4-
hydroxycoumarin for the synthesis of 3,4-dihyropyrano[c]chromenes using CuO nanoparticles as a reusable, non-
toxic and inexpensive heterogeneous nanocatalyst. The major advantage of this method is the ease of the work-up; i.e.,
the products can be isolated without chromatography. The method also offers some other advantages such as clean
reaction, low loading of catalyst, high yields of products and very short reaction times, which make it a useful and
attractive strategy for the synthesis of 3,4-dihyropyrano[c]chromenes.
References
[1] G.R. Green, J.M. Evans, A.K. Vong, et al. (Eds.), In Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry, Pergamon Press Oxford, 5 (1995) 469.
[2] W.O. Foye, Principi Di Chemico Farmaceutica, Piccin, Padova, Italy, 1991, pp. 416.
[3] L.L. Andreani, E. Lapi, Boll. Chim. Farm. 99 (1960) 583.
[4] Y.L. Zhang, B.Z. Chen, K.Q. Zheng, M.L. Xu, et al. Chem. Abstr. 17 (96) (1982) 135383e.
[5] L. Bonsignore, G. Loy, D. Secci, A. Calignano, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 28 (1993) 517.
[6] E.C. Witte, P. Neubert, A. Roesch, Ger. Offen DE. Chem. Abstr. 104 (1986) 224915f.
[7] C.S. Konkoy, D.B. Fick, S.X. Cai, et al. Chem. Abstr. 134 (2001) 29313a.
[8] R.M. Shaker, Pharmazie 51 (1996) 148.
[9] D.-Q. Shi, N. Wu, Q.-Y. Zhuang, J. Chem. Res. September (2008) 542.
[10] S. Abdolmohammadi, S. Balalaie, Tetrahedron Lett. 48 (2007) 3299.
[11] M.M. Heravi, B.A. Jani, F. Derikvand, et al. Catal. Commun. 10 (2008) 272.
[12] J.M. Khurana, S. Kumar, Tetrahedron Lett. 50 (2009) 4125.
[13] H. Mehrabi, H. Abusaidi, J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 4 (2010) 890.
[14] K. Yamamoto, T. Kasuga, M. Nogami, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2 (1999) 595.
[15] P. Poizot, S. Laruelle, S. Grugeon, et al. Nature 407 (2000) 496.
[16] Y. Liu, Q. Fu, M.F. Stephanopoulos, Catal. Today 93 (2004) 241.
[17] X. Jiang, L. Lou, Y. Chen, X. Zheng, Catal. Lett. 94 (2004) 49.
[18] A. Martinez-Arias, A.B. Hungria, M. Fernandez-Garcia, et al. Phys. Chem. B 108 (2004) 17983.
[19] V.P. Reddy, A.V. Kumar, K. Swapna, K.R. Rao, Org. Lett. 11 (2009) 951.
[20] M.L. Kantam, S. Laha, J. Yadav, et al. Adv. Synth. Catal. 349 (2007) 1797.
[21] A. Diego, G.S. Cayane, W.P. Marcio, et al. Tetrahedron Lett. 50 (2009) 6635.
[22] M.L. Kantam, S. Laha, J. Yadav, S. Bhargava, Tetrahedron Lett. 49 (2008) 3083.
[23] D. Astruc, Inorg. Chem. 46 (2007) 1884.
[24] F. Lu, J.A. Ruiz, D. Astruc, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44 (2005).