ꢂꢁꢁꢁ
A. Mukhtar et al.: Synthesis of β-O-4 linkageꢀ
ꢀ5
(300.132 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δꢀ=ꢀ7.64 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1 H, Ph-H), 5.02 (s, 2 H, Ph-CH2-), 4.86 (d, Jꢀ=ꢀ5.1 Hz, 1 H, H-α), 4.63 (m, 1
7.46–7.31 (m, 5 H, Ph), 7.23 (dd, Jꢀ=ꢀ1.7, 8.4 Hz, 1 H, Ph-H), 7.05 H, H-β), 4.03 (dd, Jꢀ=ꢀ11.1, 4.2 Hz, 1 H, H-γ), 3.88 (dd, Jꢀ=ꢀ11.1,
(d, Jꢀ=ꢀ8.4 Hz, 1 H, Ph-H), 6.91 (d, J = 12.9 Hz, 1 H, olefinic 6.3 Hz, 1 H, H-γ), 3.74 (s, 3 H, CH3) ppm. – C24H24O6 (408.16):
H), 5.87 (d, Jꢀ=ꢀ12.9 Hz, 1 H, olefinic H), 5.13 (s, 2 H, Ph-CH2-), calcd. C 70.58, H 5.92; found C 70.87, H 5.72.
3.77 (s, 3 H, CH3), 3.67 (s, 3 H, CH3). – C18H18O4 (298.34):
calcd. C 72.47, H 6.08; found C 72.52, H 6.07.
4.6 3-(4-(Benzyloxy)-3-methoxyphenyl)-
3-phenoxypropane-1,2-diol (9)
4.4 Methyl 3-(4-(benzyloxy)-3-
8 (200 mg, 0.5 mmol) was dissolved in diethyl ether, fol-
lowed by the addition of LiAlH4 (19 mg, 0.5 mmol). The
methoxyphenyl)-3-bromo-2-
hydroxypropanoate (7)
mixture was stirred for 30 min. TLC analysis indicated the
A well-stirred solution of methyl cinnamate derivative consumption of 8 after 30 min. The reaction was quenched
(6a, 990 mg, 3.32 mmol) in a mixture of acetonitrileꢀ:ꢀwater with water and the product extracted with ethyl acetate
(4ꢀ:ꢀ1, mL) was charged with NBS (717 mg, 4.03 mmol) and to furnish the title compound as a colorless solid. Yield
diphenylthioura (7.65 mg) at 0°C. The reaction mixture 162 mg (85%); – M.p. 180°C. – IR (powder): νꢀ=ꢀ3364 (OH),
was stirred at 0°C for 2 h. After completion of the reac- 1510, 1453, 1260 cm− 1. – 1H NMR (300.132 MHz, [D6]DMSO):
tion, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure δꢀ=ꢀ7.42–6.69 (m, 13 H, 3ꢀ×ꢀPh-H), 5.02 (s, 2 H, Ph-CH2-), 4.86
and the crude mixture was subjected to column chroma- (d, Jꢀ=ꢀ5.1 Hz, 1 H, H-α), 4.63 (m, 1 H, H-β), 4.03 (dd, Jꢀ=ꢀ11.1,
tography (ethyl acetateꢀ:ꢀhexane 4.5ꢀ:ꢀ5.5) to furnish the 4.2 Hz, 1 H, H-γ), 3.88 (dd, Jꢀ=ꢀ11.1, 6.3 Hz, 1 H, H-γ), 3.74 (s,
title compound as a brown gummy material. Yield: 1.24 g 3 H, CH3) ppm. – C23H24O5 (408.16): calcd. C 72.61, H 6.36;
(94.5%). – IR (film): νꢀ=ꢀ3497 (OH), 2966, 2847, 1728 (C=O), found C 72.87, H 6.72.
1590, 1378 cm−ꢀ1. –ꢀ1H NMR (300.132 MHz, [D6]DMSO):
δꢀ=ꢀ7.45–7.32 (m, 5 H, Ph), 7.07 (d, Jꢀ=ꢀ1.6 Hz, 1 H, Ph), 6.97 Acknowledgments: An internal Faculty Initiative Fund-
(d, J = 8.20 Hz, 1 H, Ph), 6.89 (dd, Jꢀ=ꢀ1.6, 8.20 Hz, 1 H, Ph), ing (FIF), awarded to MS by LUMS, was used to support
5.07 (s, 2 H, Ph-CH2-), 4.79 (dd, Jꢀ=ꢀ5.3, 9.6 Hz, 1 H, H-α), 4.52 this work. The authors wish to acknowledge the support
(d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1 H, H-β), 3.81 (d, Jꢀ=ꢀ5.3 Hz, 1 H, OH), 3.78 (s, provided by Prof. Amnon Kohen at University of Iowa for
3 H, CH3), 3.74 (s, 3 H, CH3). – C18H19BrO5 (394.02): calcd. C assisting in obtaining NMR spectra of the compounds.
54.70, H 4.85, Br 20.22; found C 54.87, H 4.72, Br 20.62.
Two undergraduate students, Hassan Shahzad, and Huda
Zahid participated in this study as internees and assisted
AM in executing the syntheses.
4.5 Methyl 3-(4-(benzyloxy)-3-
methoxyphenyl)-2-hydroxy-3-
phenoxypro-panoate (8)
References
Potassium hydride (91 mg, 2.28 mmol) was suspended in
2 mL of DMF at 0°C under argon and stirred for 15 min. A
solution of phenol (238 mg, 2.53 mmol) in 1 mL DMF was
added under argon to the suspension and further stirred
for 2 h at 0°C. Finally, a solution of bromohydrin deriva-
tive 7 (500 mg, 1.26 mmol) in 0.5 mL DMF was added to the
mixture, and stirring was continued at room temperature
for 8 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC
until 7 was completely consumed. The reaction mixture
was plunged into 5 mL cold water and then extracted with
ethyl acetate (3ꢀ×). The organic layers were combined,
dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated under
reduced pressure to furnish the title compound as a white
crystal. Yield: 473 mg (92%); – M.p. 147°C. – IR (powder):
νꢀ=ꢀ3390 (OH), 1738 (C=O), 1503, 1390, 1203 cm−ꢀ1. – 1H NMR
(300.132 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δꢀ=ꢀ7.42–6.69 (m, 13 H, 3ꢀ×ꢀPh-H),
[1] P. Mäki-Arvela, T. Salmi, B. Holmbom, S. Willför, D. Y. Murzin,
Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 5638.
[2] J. N. Chheda, G. W. Huber, J. A. Dumesic, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2007, 46, 7164.
[3] G. W. Huber, A. Corma, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7184.
[4] S. Van de Vyver, J. Geboers, P. A. Jacobs, B. F. Sels, Chem-
CatChem. 2011, 3, 82.
[5] A. Wang, T. Zhang, Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 1377.
[6] W. Deng, Q. Zhang, Y. Wang, Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 9817.
[7] K. Shimizu, A. Satsuma, Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3140.
[8] C.-H. Zhou, X. Xia, C.-X. Lin, D.-S. Tong, J. Beltramini, Chem.
Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 5588.
[9] R. Rinaldi, F. Schüth, ChemSusChem 2009, 2, 1096.
[10] A. Corma, S. Iborra, A. Velty, Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2411.
[11] C. Li, X. Zhao, A. Wang, G. W. Huber, T. Zhang, Chem. Rev. 2015,
115, 11559.
[12] A. Rahimi, A. Ulbrich, J. J. Coon, S. S. Stahl, Nature, 2014,
515, 249.
Brought to you by | Iowa State University
Authenticated
Download Date | 1/24/17 6:06 PM