11252 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 123, No. 45, 2001
Fokin et al.
1
tion) and CrO2Cl2 (C-C activation) are clearly different, and
only relatively unstable 3 reacts with both CrO2Cl2 and DMD
similarly via thermodynamically favored C-C bond molecule-
induced homolysis. Hence, this mechanism, which is typical
for metal-oxo reagents in general, and for CrO2Cl2 in particular,
plays at best a minor role in alkane activations with dioxiranes.
In stark contrast to the reactions with metal-oxo reagents, only
very weak σ-bonds (like the central C-C bond in 3) can be
homolyzed by ground-state singlet DMD.
1-hydroxy-3,6-dehydrohomoadamantane (9), mp ) 171-172 °C. H
NMR (δ, ppm, CDCl
3
): 1.55-1.62 m (4H), 1.64-1.70 s (4H), 1.79-
1
3
1
.86 m (1H), 1.88-2.00 m (4H), 2.01-2.08 d (2H), 2.39 bs (1H). C
3
NMR (δ, ppm, CDCl ): 80.03, 54.88, 48.01, 46.82, 42.87, 39.30, 28.37.
MS (70 eV): m/z ) 164, 146, 136, 121, 109, 106, 95, 91, 81, 67, 55.
Anal. Calcd for C11 16O: C, 80.44; H, 9.82. Found: C, 80.29; H, 9.71.
C. Reaction of 1 with CrO Cl . Into a stirred solution of 400 mg
1.79 mmol) of 1 in 11 mL of CCl was added a solution of 1.08 g of
CrO Cl (7.01 mmol) in 10 mL of CCl dropwise at 0 °C under argon.
The reaction mixture was quenched with aqueous saturated Na S O ,
H
2
2
(
4
2
2
4
2
2
5
the organic layer was separated, and the aqueous part was extracted
Computational Methods
with CHCl (3 × 15 mL). The combined extracts were washed with
3
2 4
water and brine and were dried over Na SO . After removal of the
Geometries were fully optimized utilizing the density functional
5
6,57
solvent, column chromatography (ether:n-hexane ) 2:1) of the residue
gave 113 mg (0.38 mmol, 21%) of 1-chloro-3-(1-chlorobenzyl)ada-
mantane (4) and 366 mg (1.33 mmol, 75%) of phenyl-3-chloroadamant-
three-parameter hybrid B3LYP functional
in conjunction with
-31G* and 6-311+G** basis sets as implemented in Gaussian 98.5
8
6
Temperature corrections (298 K) were derived from B3LYP/6-31G*
frequency computations; these corrections were used to correct the
higher quality single-point energies at B3LYP/6-311+G**. The
1
-yl ketone (5).
Compound 4. H NMR (δ, ppm, CDCl
1H), 7.15 m (5H). 13C NMR (δ, ppm, CDCl
127.77, 77.32, 68.32, 48.48, 46.73, 42.36, 37.34, 37.12, 34.59, 31.11.
Anal. Calcd for C17 : C, 69.16; H, 6.83; Cl, 24.02. Found: C,
69.23; H, 6.81; Cl, 24.13.
1
3
): 1.1-2.3 m (14H), 4.3 s
3
): 137.61, 128.82, 128.06,
(
“
guess)mix” option was used for open-shell singlet state computations.
59,60 61
While this is an approximate treatment, others
and we have had
H20Cl
2
very positive experience with this type of approach; notably, Bach et
al. observed RHFfUHF instabilities for some dioxirane structures.21
Although DFT is, in principle, a single-determinant method, very often
obvious multireference states can be described adequately if one
dominant configuration yields an acceptable density. Hence, the results
of such DFT computations must be gauged against higher level methods.
As the state splittings for DMD agree well at MRD-CI, CCSD(T), and
1
Compound 5. H NMR (δ, ppm, CDCl
3
): 7.76 m (1H), 7.53 m
(
1H), 7.30 m (3H), 2.70 s (2H), 2.33 s (2H), 2.12-2.15 m (2H), 1.7-
1
3
20
1.92 m (8H). C NMR (δ, ppm, CDCl
1
3
3
): 200.66, 150.32, 133.56,
32.39, 126.73, 126.18, 125.62, 52.12, 51.32, 49.33, 46.63, 45.09, 35.99,
3.56. Anal. Calcd for C17 19ClO: C, 74.31; H, 6.97; Cl, 12.90.
H
Found: C, 74.24; H, 6.95; Cl, 12.82.
D. Reaction of 3 with DMD. Following procedure A, from 105
mg (0.78 mmol) of 1,3-dehydroadamantane (3) in 10 mL of CH Cl
2 2
B3LYP levels of theory, the approach used here seems justified for
making qualitative arguments and comparisons with experiment.22 The
reaction pathways along both directions from the transition structures
were followed by the IRC method. xyz coordinates and energies for
all optimized species are summarized in the Supporting Information.
6
2
and 12.5 mL of a 0.063 M acetone solution of DMD (0.79 mmol) were
obtained 55 mg of 3-methylenebicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-7-one (11) (0.36
mmol, 46%) and 11 mg of 1,3-dihydroxyadamantane (10) (0.06 mmol,
6
3,64
8
%), identical from MS and NMR data to standard samples.
The
Experimental Section
conversion of 3 was virtually complete as determined after quenching
the reaction mixture with water (only trace amounts of 1-hydroxyada-
mantane as a result of the addition of water to 3 were found). In a
series of control experiments, we also ran this reaction with only 10%
DMD under argon. After quenching of the reaction with water, the
conversion of 3 was found to be close to 10%; the product distributions
were identical. Running this reaction in the presence of oxygen (bubbled
through the solution), we obtained the same results as under argon in
the absence of oxygen. Hence, 3 reacts much faster with DMD than
with oxygen, in contrast to the slow reactions of 1 and 2 where DMD
decomposes much faster relative to the hydrocarbon oxidation reaction.
E. Reaction of 3 with CrO Cl . Following procedure C, from 500
A. Reaction of 1 with DMD. Into a degassed solution of 312 mg
(
1.39 mmol) of 4-phenyl-3,6-dehydrohomoadamantane (1) in 3 mL of
dry acetone was added 21 mL of a 0.073 M acetone solution of DMD
1.54 mmol) under argon. After 20 h the solvents were removed under
reduced pressure. Column chromatography (silica gel Merck 60, ether:
n-hexane ) 2:1) of the residue gave 180 mg of unreacted 1 (conversion
2%) and 77 mg (0.32 mmol, 23%) of 4-hydroxy-4-phenyl-3,6-
(
4
1
dehydrohomoadamantane (6). H NMR (δ, ppm, CDCl
3
): 1.30-1.78
m (7H), 1.86 s (2H), 2.13 AB (15 Hz, 1H), 2.24 bs (2H), 2.47 bs (1H),
3
2
.34 m (1H), 2.77 AB (15 Hz, 1H), 7.25-7.38 (5H). 1 C NMR (δ,
ppm, CDCl ): 145.25, 128.27, 127.02, 126.64, 76.20, 58.56, 49.66,
9.15, 46.59, 42.40, 42.36, 42.23, 41.59, 41.14, 35.81. MS (70 eV):
m/z ) 240, 222, 197, 183, 179, 167, 147, 129, 105, 91, 77, 65, 51.
Anal. Calcd for C17 20O: C, 84.96; H, 8.39. Found: C, 85.05; H, 8.26.
3
2
2
4
2 2
mg (3.73 mmol) of 3 in 15 mL of CH Cl and a solution of 700 mg
of CrO Cl2 (4.52 mmol) in 5 mL of CCl4 was obtained 445 mg
2
H
(2.39 mmol, 64%) of 1-chloro-3-hydroxyadamantane (12) after column
chromatography, identical to the standard sample65 from MS and
NMR data. Changing the solvent to methanol gave 150 mg (0.89 mmol,
24%) of 1,3-dihydroxyadamantane (10), also identical to the standard
sample.64
B. Reaction of 2 with DMD. Following procedure A, to 300 mg
2.03 mmol) of 3,6-dehydrohomoadamantane (2) in 2 mL of acetone
was added 44 mL of a 0.047 M acetone solution of DMD (2.07 mmol),
(
to give 270 mg of unreacted 2 and 20 mg (0.12 mmol, 6%) of
(
(
(
56) Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. ReV. B 1988, 37, 785-789.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie,
the University of Georgia, and the Fundamental Research
Foundation of the Ukraine.
57) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648-5652.
58) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.;
Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A.
D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi,
M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.;
Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Malick,
D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.;
Ortiz, J. V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi,
I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.;
Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M.
W.; Johnson, B. G.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Head-Gordon,
M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, revision A.7; Gaussian,
Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
Supporting Information Available: xyz coordinates and
absolute energies (Table 1) of all optimized species (PDF). This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at
http://pubs.acs.org.
JA0158096
(
59) Gr a¨ fenstein, J.; Kraka, E.; Cremer, D. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 288,
(63) Stetter, H.; Tacke, P. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1963, 96, 694-697.
(64) Moiseev, I. K.; Belyaev, P. G.; Barabanova, I. V.; Bardyug, O. P.;
Vishnevskii, E. H.; Novatskaya, N. I.; Golod, E. L.; Gidaspov, B. V. Zh.
Org. Khim. 1975, 11, 214-215.
(65) Moiseev, I. K.; Klimochkin, Y. N.; Zemcova, M. N.; Trahtenberg,
P. L. Zh. Org. Khim. 1984, 20, 1435-1438.
5
93-602.
(
(
60) Cramer, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6261-6269.
61) Schreiner, P. R.; Prall, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8615-
8
627.
62) Fukui, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1970, 74, 4161.
(