218 JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH 2013
solutions with TMS as the internal standard. Infrared spectra were
recorded using KBr pellets on a FT-IR Shimadzu 8400S spectrometer.
Melting points were determined using an Electrothermal 9100 appara-
tus. All chemicals and reagents were purchased from Merck Company
and used without further purification except for benzaldehyde which
was distilled prior to being used. Analytical TLC was carried out using
Merck 0.2 mm silica gel 60 F-254 Al-plates. All yields refer to the
isolated products after purification. The ionic liquids [emim]BF4 and
[bmim]BF427, [omim]BF428, and [bdmim]BF429 were prepared using
available procedures,. All the products were known and were identi-
fied by comparison of their melting points and/or spectroscopic data
with those reported in the literature.
on the three-component Mannich reaction of paraformalde-
hyde, pyrrolidine and β-naphthol as the model reaction
(Scheme 1) was examined in order to find the ionic liquid with
the best catalytic effects. The results in Table 1 show that
among various ionic liquids used in the model reaction,
[omim][BF4] had the best performance in respect to the
reaction time and the yield of the product (Table 1, entry 3).
Effect of amounts of [omim][BF4]
In order to optimise the reaction condition, the use of different
amounts of [omim][BF4] was evaluated in the model reaction.
From the data presented in the Table 2, it is obvious that the
optimum result was obtained when the reaction was carried
out in 2.8 mmol of the ionic liquid (Table 2, entry 2).
The optimised conditions were then employed to evaluate
the generality of the procedure (Table 3). In the reactions of
2-naphthol with formaldehyde and cyclic or acyclic amines,
the Mannich bases were obtained in good to excellent yields
within short times (entries 1–6). 1-Naphthol (entries 7–9),
indole derivatives (entries 10–12), and benzamide (entries 13
and 14) also reacted well under the same conditions to give
their respective products, although lower yields were obtained
in some cases.
Typical procedure
A mixture of paraformaldehyde (1.5 mmol), a secondary amine
(1.5 mmol), and an aromatic compound (1.0 mmol) in [omim][BF4]
(2.8 mmol) was stirred at room temperature for the appropriate length
of time (Table 3). After completion of the reaction, based on TLC
monitoring, the reaction mixture was extracted with Et2O (3 × 10 mL).
The extract was washed with brine (20 mL), dried over anhydrous
Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product
was purified by column chromatography using silica gel and EtOAc/
hexane as the eluent (if necessary) or recrystallised from hexane and
ethanol. The products were dried under vacuum at 40° C.
We acknowledge partial financial support by the Research
Council of Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST).
Reusability and recovery
The reusability of the ionic liquid was investigated in consecu-
tive Mannich reactions of paraformaldehyde and pyrrolidine
with 2-naphthol. The reactions were carried out by following
the typical procedure. At the end of each reaction and after
extraction of the products, the ionic liquid was recovered by
removing the volatile solvent under reduced pressure using
a rotary evapourator. The results of the reuse of the ionic
liquid are summarised in the Fig. 1. As it is shown, the ionic
liquid can be used for at least four consecutive runs without
considerable loss of its catalytic activity.
Received 26 November 2012; accepted 11 February 2013
Paper 1201579 doi: 10.3184/174751913X13635476751996
Published online: 19 April 2013
References
1
2
H.J. Grumbach, M. Arend and N. Risch, Synthesis, 1996, 883.
E.F. Kleinman, In: B.M. Trost and I. Fleming (eds), Comprehensive organic
synthesis, 1991, Vol. 2, chap. 4.1, p. 893. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
M. Tramontini and L. Angiolini, Mannich bases, chemistry and uses, CRC
Press, Boca Raton, 1994.
P. Traxler, U. Trinks, E. Buchdunger, H. Mett, T. Meyer, M. Müller,
U. Regenass, J. Rösel and N. Lydon, J. Med. Chem., 1995, 38, 2441.
M. Arend, B. Westermann and N. Risch, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 1998, 37,
1044.
3
4
5
Conclusion
In conclusion, we have described a simple and efficient proce-
dure for the three-component one-pot aminomethylation of
various aromatic electron-rich compounds using ionic liquids
as the catalyst and solvent at room temperature. Whereas
all the ionic liquids which were studied catalysed the model
reaction, it has been found that [omim][BF4] was the most
effective. The method has several advantages including mild
reaction conditions, high yields of the products, simple work-
up procedure, short reaction times, use of green and recover-
able medium, and presence of no other extra additives or
catalysts, and specially room temperature reaction conditions.
6
7
8
J.S. Wilkes, Green Chem., 2002, 4, 73.
T. Welton, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 2071.
M.A.P. Martins, C.P. Frizzo, D.N. Moreira, N. Zanatta and H.G. Bonacorso,
Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 2015.
S. Keskin, D.K. Talay, U. Akman and O. Hortacsu, J. Supercrit. Fluids,
2007, 43, 150.
9
10 T. Welton, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2004, 248, 2459.
11 A.R. Hajipour and F. Rafiee, J. Iran. Chem. Soc., 2009, 6, 647.
12 A. Sharifi, M. Mirzaei and M.R. Naimi-Jamal, Monatsh. Chem., 2001, 132,
875.
13 M.M. Mojtahedi, A. Sharifi, F. Mohsenzadeh and M.R. Saidi, Synth.
Commun., 2000, 30, 69.
14 A. Sharifi, F. Mohsenzadeh and M.R. Naimi-Jamal, J. Chem. Res. (S),
Experimental
2000, 394.
1H NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker DRX 500 Avance
(500MHz) and Bruker Ultra Shield, 80 MHz spectrometers in CDCl3
15 A. Jha, N.K. Paul, S. Trikha and T.S. Cameron, Can. J. Chem., 2006, 84,
843–853.
16 P.J.J. Huang, T.S. Cameron and A. Jha, Tetrahedron Lett., 2009, 50, 51.
17 K.W. Chi,Y.S. Ahn, K.T. Shim, T.H. Park and J.S. Ahn, Bull. Korean Chem.
Soc., 1999, 20, 973.
18 J.R. Feldman and E.C. Wagner, J. Org. Chem., 1942, 7, 31.
19 S.V. Lieberman and E.C. Wagner, J. Org. Chem., 1949, 14, 1001.
20 D. Fang, K. Gong, D.Z. Zhang and Z.L. Liu, Monatsh. Chem., 2009, 140,
1325.
21 D. Fang, J. Luo, L.X. Zhou and Z.L. Liu, Catal. Lett., 2007, 116, 76.
22 Y. Caibo, Synth. Commun., 2010, 40, 3640.
23 E. Haslinger and P. Wolschann, Monatsh. Chem., 1980, 111, 563.
24 R.L. Shriner, G.F. Grillot and W.O. Teeters, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1946, 68,
946.
25 N. Assimomytis, Y. Sariyannis, G. Stavropoulos, P.G. Tsoungas,
G. Varvounis and P. Cordopatis, Synlett, 2009, 17, 2777.
26 J.T. Li, S.F. Sun and M.X. Sun, Ultrason. Sonochem., 2011, 18, 42.
27 S. Park and R.J. Kazlauskas, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 8395.
28 J.M. Slattery, C. Daguenet, P.J. Dyson, T.J.S. Schubert, I. Krossing, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 5384.
29 G.H. Min, T. Yim, H. Yeong Lee, H.J. Kim, J. Mun, S. Kim, S.M. Oh, and
Fig. 1 Efficient recycling of the catalyst [omim][BF4].
Y.G. Kim, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 2007, 28, 1562.