Identification of Tetrahydro-
â
-carbolinedicarboxylic Acids
J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 45, No. 7, 1997 2459
Ta ble 1. 1,2,3,4-Tetr a h yd r o-â-ca r bolin e-3-ca r boxylic
DMSO-d
6
), 10.78 (s, 1H, H-9), 7.48 (d, 2H, H-5 and H-8), 7.12
Acid s Id en tified in F ood Sa m p les
(dd, 1H, H-7), 7.03 (dd, 1H, H-6), 4.17 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.22 (dd,
H, H-4ax), 2.96 (dd, 1H, H-4eq), 1.81 (s, 3H, 1-CH
8 Hz, J 6,7 ) 7 Hz, J 3,4ax ) 4 Hz, J 3,4eq ) 12 Hz, J 4ax,4eq ) 15
1
3
); J 5,6 ) J 7,8
)
1
3
Hz; C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d
COOH′), 136.30 (C-8a), 133.70 (C-9a), 125.92 (C-4b), 121.22
C-7), 118.62 (C-6), 117.73 (C-5), 111.74 (C-8), 104.96 (C-4a),
5.75 (C-1), 52.15 (C-3), 24.49 (CH ), 24.05 (C-4). Minor
diastereomer: H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d ), 11.16 (s, 1H,
H-9), 7.49 (d, 1H, H-5), 7.41 (d, 1H, H-8), 7.13 (dd, 1H, H-7),
6
), 169.83 (COOH and
(
5
3
1
6
compd no.
R1
R2
7
2
.04 (dd, 1H, H-6), 4.15 (dd, 1H, H-3), 3.16 (dd, 1H, H-4ax),
.83 (dd, 1H, H-4eq), 1.80 (s, 3H, 1-CH
7 Hz, J 3,4ax ) 4 Hz, J 3,4eq ) 12 Hz; J 4ax,4eq ) 15 Hz; C-NMR
1
H
CH3
H
H
H
3
); J 5,6 ) J 7,8 ) 8 Hz, J 6,7
13
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
a a
)
a
b
a
b
a
b
a
CH3
COOH
H
COOH
CH3
H
(
6
100 MHz, DMSO-d ), 172.64, 172.52 (COOH and COOH′),
a
H
a
136.50 (C-8a), 133.86 (C-9a), 125.81 (C-4b), 121.06 (C-7), 118.52
(C-6), 117.82 (C-5), 111.28 (C-8), 105.90 (C-4a), 60.19 (C-1),
54.08 (C-3), 25.07 (CH ), 24.00 (C-4).
3
COOH
CH3
COOH
CH2-CH2-COOH
H
b
b
a
1-(2′-Carboxyethyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-â-carboline-3-carboxy-
lic Acid (5a /b). Compound 5a /b was synthesized by reaction
of L-tryptophan and succinic semialdehyde. The major dia-
stereomer cis-1-(2′-carboxyethyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-â-carbo-
line-3-carboxylic acid 5a precipitated; the filtrate, a mixture
of both diastereomers, was lyophilized prior to NMR analysis.
Relative configuration of the diastereomers was determined
by 13C-NMR (Cox and Cook, 1995). Signal assignment (Table
a
b
CH2-CH2-COOH
a
Assignment of absolute configuration was based on the
observation that racemization at C3 is negligible while working
at room temperature in aqueous media (Bailey et al., 1993).
b
Assignment of absolute configuration is exchangeable.
Refer en ce Com p ou n d s. Synthesis of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-
â-carboline-3-carboxylic acid 1 and 1-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahy-
dro-â-carboline-3-carboxylic acid 2a /b was based on the pro-
cedure of J acobs and Craig (1936). Absolute configurations
of the resulting diastereomers (1S,3S)-1-methyl-1,2,3,4-tet-
rahydro-â-carboline-3-carboxylic acid 2a and (1R,3S)-1-methyl-
1
+
2
) was confirmed by CH-COSY experiments. ESI-MS, [M
+
H] m/ z 289; ESI-MS/MS (15 eV, 2.0 mTorr Ar), m/z 272,
16, 188, 130. Data for cis-1-(2′-carboxyethyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahy-
1
dro-â-carboline-3-carboxylic acid 5a : H-NMR (400 MHz, CD
OD), 7.69 (d, 1H, H-5), 7.57 (d, 1H, H-8), 7.36 (dd, 1H, H-7),
.27 (dd, 1H, H-6), 5.02 (m, 1H, H-1), 4.59 (dd, 1H, H-3), 3.67
dd, 1H, H-4ax), 3.34 (dd, 1H, H-4eq), 2.86 (m, 3H, H-2′ and
H-1′ax), 2.50 (m, 1H, H-1′eq); J 5,6 ) J 7,8 ) 8 Hz, J 6,7 ) 7 Hz,
3
-
7
(
1
,2,3,4-tetrahydro-â-carboline-3-carboxylic acid 2b were as-
signed according to published data (Yamada and Akimoto,
969). The identity of 2a /b was confirmed by ESI-MS, ESI-
MS/MS, and NMR spectroscopy.
,2,3,4-Tetrahydro-â-carboline-1,3-dicarboxylic Acid (3a /b).
.5 mM L-tryptophan was dissolved in 7.5 mL of water. After
1
13
J
3,4ax ) 5 Hz, J 3,4eq ) 12 Hz, J 4ax,4eq ) 16 Hz; C-NMR (100
MHz, DMSO-d + deuterated TFA), 174.07, 170.53 (COOH
6
1
and COOH′), 136.77 (C-8a), 129.64 (C-9a), 125.88 (C-4b),
122.35 (C-7), 119.54 (C-6), 118.47 (C-5), 111.77 (C-8), 105.67
(C-4a), 55.53, 53.42 (C-1 and C-3), 29.45 (CH -2′), 26.08 (CH -
2
addition of 1 mL of 0.5 M sulfuric acid (pH 2) and 5 mM
glyoxylic acid, the reaction mixture was allowed to stand at
room temperature for 2 days (Harvey et al., 1941). The
precipitate consisting of the major diastereomer cis-1,2,3,4-
tetrahydro-â-carboline-1,3-dicarboxylic acid 3b was collected
by filtration, washed with water, and dried. Both lyophiliza-
tion and preparative HPLC of the trans-configurated isomer
failed as the compound rapidly decomposed on concentration.
Thus, the remaining filtrate containing a mixture of both
diastereomers was concentrated by C18 solid phase extraction
2
2
1′), 22.40 (C-4). Data for trans-1-(2′-carboxyethyl)-1,2,3,4-
tetrahydro-â-carboline-3-carboxylic acid 5b:
MHz, DMSO-d + deuterated TFA), 51.92, 51.34 (C-1 and C-3).
1
3
C-NMR (100
6
An a lytica l P r oced u r es. Sample Preparation. Prior to
any preconcentration step food samples were spiked with
L-tryptophan-d (10 µg mL-1) for monitoring artifact formation
5
during sample handling (Gutsche et al., 1996). Seasoning
sauce, soy sauce, and worcestershire sauce were filtered
through membrane filters of pore size 0.2 µm, and the resulting
solutions were directly subjected to HPLC-ESI-MS/MS analy-
sis. All other samples were concentrated by C18 solid phase
extraction as follows: Aliquots of alcoholic beverages and fruit
products (normally 10 mL) were diluted to 20 mL end-volume
with distilled water. In the case of yeast extract and caramel
color, the sample (1-10 g) was diluted to 20 mL with distilled
water and centrifuged, and the supernatant was used for
analysis. Each sample was adjusted to pH 1 by addition of 2
M hydrochloric acid and subjected to solid phase extraction
(SPE) (Visiprep SPE vacuum manifold system; Supelco, Belle-
fonte, MD, U.S.A.). SPE was performed with C18 cartridges
(200 mg) conditioned with 3 mL of methanol and 6 mL of
water. After application of the acidified sample and washing
with 3 mL of water adjusted to pH 1 with HCl, each column
was eluted (0.2 mL/min) with 1 mL of methanol containing
1% TFA (v/v). The eluate was evaporated under a gentle
stream of nitrogen and redissolved in 100 µL of aqueous (90
% (v/v)) acetonitrile.
and eluted with CD
3
OD containing 0.1% deuterated trifluo-
roacetic acid (TFA) (v/v) prior to NMR analysis of the trans-
isomer. Relative configurations were determined by 13C-NMR
spectroscopy (Cox and Cook, 1995). Assignment of NMR
signals (Table 1) was confirmed by DEPT experiments. ESI-
+
MS, [M + H] m/ z 261; ESI-MS/MS (15 eV, 2.0 mTorr Ar),
m/ z 217, 188, 145. Data for cis-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-â-carboline-
1
1
,3-dicarboxylic acid 3b: H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d
6
), 10.79
(s, 1H, H-9), 7.57 (d, 1H, H-5), 7.52 (d, 1H, H-8), 7.15 (dd, 1H,
H-7), 7.05 (dd, 1H, H-6), 4.99 (s, 1H, H-1), 4.29 (dd, 1H, H-3),
3
J
.28 (dd, 1H, H-4ax), 3.09 (m, 1H, H-4eq); J 5,6 ) J 7,8 ) 8 Hz,
6,7 ) 7 Hz, J 3,4ax ) 5 Hz, J 3,4eq ) 12 Hz, J 4ax,4eq ) 16 Hz; 13C-
NMR (100 MHz, CD
1
1
3
OD + deuterated TFA), 170.70 and
67.73 (COOH and COOH′), 138.75 (C-8a), 127.09 (C-9a),
24.04 (C-4b), 120.96 (C-7), 119.08 (C-6), 118.35 (C-5), 112.92
(C-8), 107.80 (C-4a), 56.40, 56.10 (C-1 and C-3), 23.28 (C-4).
Data for trans-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-â-carboline-1,3-dicarboxylic
1
3
acid 3a : C-NMR (100 MHz, CD
4.70, 54.25 (C-1 and C-3), 22.79 (C-4).
-Methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-â-carboline-1,3-dicarboxylic Acid
4a /b). 4a /b was synthesized as described above using 5 mM
3
OD + deuterated TFA),
5
Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Tetrahydro-â-carbolinecar-
boxylic Acids. Chromatographic separation for HPLC-ESI-
MS/MS was performed on an Eurospher 100 C18 column (100
× 2.0 m i.d., 5 µm) (Knauer, Berlin, Germany) using a binary
gradient. Solvent A was 0.05% TFA in water (v/v), solvent B
was 0.05% TFA in acetonitrile (v/v). HPLC was programmed
as follows: pressurizing with 50% B, equilibration time 5 min
at 10% solvent B and linear gradient elution (0 min, 10% B;
20 min, 30% B; 30 min, 50% B). The flow rate was 200 µL
1
(
pyruvic acid as carbonyl compound. The major diastereomer
precipitated. The minor diastereomer was isolated by pre-
parative HPLC (Eurospher 100 C18 column 16 × 250 mm,
5
µm; water-acetonitrile 8-2 containing 0.05% (v/v) TFA).
NMR signal assignment (Table 1) was confirmed by DEPT,
+
CH-COSY, and HMBC experiments. ESI-MS, [M + H] m/ z
2
1
-
1
75; ESI-MS/MS (15 eV, 2.0 mTorr Ar), m/z 258, 231, 202,
min and the injection volume was 5 µL, respectively. For
pneumatically assisted electrospray ionization, the spray
84, 159, 146, 130. Major diastereomer: 1H-NMR (400 MHz,