Catalyzed Ring Opening of Epoxides by TMSCN and TMSN
3
salen-Cr catalyst (24 h) is needed to complete the reaction.6
In this better-understood TMS-N3 reaction, it is known that the
reactive nucleophile (LCr-N3) is generated from initially formed
HN3, which when used separately, can also initiate the reaction.
We believe that the cyanide-opening reactions catalyzed by Y
are mechanistically different. For example, in an early experi-
ment we saw that no trace of the ring-opening product was
formed when HCN was used in place of TMSCN. Also running
the reaction with 5 fold excess (with respect to the catalyst) of
a desiccant Cp2Zr(Me)2 or activated molecular sieve has no
effect on the reaction. A set of parallel reactions with either
TMSCN or TMSN3 with epoxycyclohexane proceed with the
same rate and selectiVity, whether 5 equiV of Cp2Zr(Me)2 is
present or not.
FIGURE 2. Monomeric and dimeric Y-salen complexes.
An examination of a possible nonlinear effect using catalyst
[
L4]Y[N(dms)2][THF] of varying enantiomeric excess showed
yttrium-salen complex [L1]Y[THF][N(dms)2] (Figure 2).1b
Here, we report the structure of the complex [(L4)Y(µ-OH)]2
that there is no such effect operating in the Y-salen-mediated
TMSCN opening of epoxides. Thus, between 0 and 100% ee
of the catalyst, a plot of % ee of the ligand vs % ee of the
product showed a nearly perfect linear fit (R ) 0.9758).
With the structural information on the Y catalysts, and the
early evidence suggesting an exceptionally fast reaction (Table
(
[
Figure 3).14 The former incorporates one anionic ligand
-N(SiHMe2)2] and one neutral ligand (THF), while the latter
2
10
appears to be an adventitious hydrolysis product of a similar
complex from BINAP(NH2)2-derived salen. This complex has
a dimeric structure carrying a bridging OH ion. The structure
of [L1]Y[THF][N(dms)2] (eq 1) has distorted trigonal prismatic
geometry while the latter (Figure 3) has a distorted octahedral
geometry. The structure of L1-derived complex 5 also reveals
an unusual agostic interaction between one of the Si atoms and
Y, presumably brought about by the highly Lewis acidic nature
of Y and the particular geometry of the backbone. In a related
3
), we wondered whether the dual-activation mechanism sug-
gested by Jacobsen is plausible in such a highly efficient catalyst.
We sought to clarify the mechanism of the TMSCN-mediated
reaction by studying its kinetics by in situ IR spectroscopy. Four
factors make this an almost ideal reaction for the use of this
technique: (i) the total absence of any other side reactions
1
5
(
including the formation of the isonitrile adduct, νNC ) 2140
salen complex prepared from 1,2-ethylenediamine, this interac-
-
1
tion is absent.14b In 5, the large yttrium atom is placed 0.95 Å
cm ); (ii) the distinct and clearly resolved IR signatures of
-1
TMSCN (νCN ) 2192 cm ) of and of the product cyanohydrin
above the N2O2 plane. From a mechanistic perspective, such a
structure would permit activation of either the epoxide (ligand
substitution of THF) or of the cyanide (substitution of the
silylamide ligand). A comparison of structures 6 and 7, a dimer
-
1
TMS ether (νCN ) 2246 cm ); (iii) moderate and easily
measurable reaction rates under near stoichiometric conditions
of the reagents, using 0.10-0.50 mol % of catalyst at temper-
atures between -20 and +25 °C; and (iv) the fact that there is
no deterioration of selectivity as a function of conversion, clearly
suggesting that the catalyst is quite robust under these reaction
conditions.
prepared by Morken14a from L1 and yttrium isopropoxide, seems
to suggest that L1 is a sterically less demanding ligand (vis- a` -
vis L4) since the dimer 7 contains an additional acetone moiety
coordinated to each of the Y atoms. Such an additional ligand
is not seen in 6, prepared from L4. Thus, a tightly controlled
ligand field in complexes of L4 might account for the improved
selectivity of catalysts derived from BINAP(NH2)2.
An Attempt To Determine the Order of the Reaction in
the Metal. The moderate enantioselectivity in the epoxycyclo-
hexane opening (77% ee vs the best published result, 91%)
notwithstanding, the Y-catalyzed reaction, which can be run
under solvent-free conditions with 0.0001 equiv of the catalyst,
is truly remarkable in its efficiency. Most relevant is the
comparison to the Jacobsen protocol which uses an YbCl3-
In initial blank experiments, it was observed that the addition
of epoxide to a stoichiometric amount of the Y catalyst brought
about very little change in either the IR (hexane) or NMR spectra
(toluene-d8) for 22 h. The characteristic peaks due to the
1
coordinated epoxide [ H NMR in tol-d8: broad doublet δ 2.93
1
3
and 3.01; C NMR δ 53.84 (m), 24.46 (s) and 24.38(s)] are
retained at least up to 22 h after mixing a stoichiometric amount
of the catalyst [L4]Y[N(dms)2][THF] and epoxycyclohexane.
However, upon addition of an equivalent amount of cyanide,
significant changes ensue, the most important being an immedi-
ate (<1 min) replacement in the IR of the peak due to TMSCN
(pybox) complex, where, through kinetic studies, he has
-1
-1
(νCN ) 2192 cm ) by a strong signal at 2077 cm , tentatively
provided tentative evidence for the possible involvement of a
bimetallic activation.3b In a corresponding solvent-free TMSN3
opening, Jacobsen reports that 0.01 equiv of a monomeric
(15) In the ring-opening reaction of epoxycyclohexane by TMSCN,
selective formation of a nitrile or an isonitrile product can be achieved by
the choice of Lewis acids. Thus, Zn, Pd, Sn, In, and Ga salts give the
isonitrile, whereas Ca, Mg, Zn, Y, Ti, and most lanthanide salts give the
nitrile. Isonitrile: (a) Gassman, P. G.; Guggenheim, T. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1982, 104, 5849. (b) Spessard, G. O.; Ritter, A. R.; Johnson, D. M.;
Montgomery, A. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 655. (c) Imi, K.;
Yanagihara, N.; Utimoto, K. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 1013. (d) Zhu, C.;
Yuan, F.; Gu, W.; Pan, Y. Chem. Commun. 2003, 692. Nitrile: (e) Lidy,
W.; Sundermeyer, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 1449. (f) Mullis, J. C.; Weber,
W. P. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 2873. (g) Hayashi, M.; Tamura, M.; Oguni,
N. Synlett 1982, 663. (h) Sugita, K.; Ohta, A.; Onaka, M.; Izumi, Y. Chem.
Lett. 1990, 481. (i) Matsubara, S.; Onishi, H.; Utimoto, K. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1990, 31, 6209. See also refs 3a,b,g.
(
14) For recent examples of related structures of other salen metal
complexes, see, Y: (a) Y(L1)(µ-OH)]2: Mascarenhas, C. M.; Miller, S.
P.; White, P. S.; Morken, J. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 601. (b)
Runte, O.; Priermeier, T.; Anwander, R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
996, 1385. (c) Herrmann, W. A.; Anwander, R.; Munck, F. C.; Scherer,
W.; Dufaud, V.; Huber, N. W.; Artus, G. R. J. Z. Naturforsch., B 1994, 49,
789. (d) Evans, W. J.; Fujimoto, C. H.; Ziller, J. W. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1999, 311. (e) An alkoxide bridged dimer: Ovitt, T. M.; Coates,
G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1316. Al: (f) Al(L4)X: Evans, D. A.;
Janey, J. M.; Magomedov, N.; Tedrow, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001,
1
1
4
0, 1884.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 72, No. 23, 2007 8651