J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2931-2932
Scheme 1. Simplified Chemical Mechanism of SLOa
2931
Steric Control of Oxygenation Regiochemistry in
Soybean Lipoxygenase-1
Michael J. Knapp, Florian P. Seebeck,‡ and
Judith P. Klinman*
Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of California
Berkeley, California 94720
ReceiVed NoVember 2, 2000
Mammalian lipoxygenases catalyze the formation of important
biological secondary messengers and have been implicated in
carcinogenesis1 and inflammation.2 While the catalytic reaction
of all known lipoxygenases leads to the formation of a substrate-
derived radical intermediate, most lipoxygenase products are
highly regio- and stereopure.3 Soybean lipoxygenase-1 (SLO),
the prototypical model lipoxygenase, catalyzes the oxidation of
linoleic acid (LA) by O2, producing 13-(S)-hydroperoxyoctadeca-
dienoic acid (HPOD). The first chemical step in this reaction4 is
abstraction of the pro-S hydrogen atom from C-11 by the active-
site Fe3+-OH to generate a putatively delocalized carbon based
radical (L•) and Fe2+-OH2. This intermediate reacts with O2 to
regenerate Fe3+-OH and the product 13-(S)-HPOD (Scheme 1).
Reactions in solution between carbon radicals and triplet O2
typically lead to many isomers and are generally diffusion
limited.5 While SLO reacts with O2 at a rapid rate (kcat/KM(O2) )
4.4 × 106 M-1 s-1), this reaction remains highly selective for O2
attack at C-13. This has led to the notion that the active-site Fe2+
influences the site of O2 insertion via a purple (Fe-OOL)2+
intermediate.18 However, this idea is difficult to reconcile with
the fact that H-abstraction by Fe3+-OH is antarafacial to O2
insertion.6 Inspection of the crystal structure for SLO7 reveals a
a WT-SLO produces predominantly 13-(S)-HPOD at high pH.
‡ Current address: Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, Swiss Federal Institute
of Technology (ETH), CH-8092, Zu¨rich, Switzerland.
(1) Rioux, N.; Castonguay, A. Carcinogenesis 1998, 19, 1393-1400.
(2) Samuelsson, B.; Dahlen, S.-E.; Lindgren, J.; Rouzer, C. A.; Serhan, C.
N. Science 1987, 237, 1171-1176.
(3) Kuhn, H.; Thiele, B. J. FEBS Lett. 1999, 449, 7-11.
(4) Glickman, M. H.; Klinman, J. P. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 12882-12892.
(5) Walling, C. Autoxidation. In ActiVe Oxygen in Chemistry, 1st ed.; Foote,
C. S., Valentine, J. S., Greenberg, A., Liebman, J. F., Eds.; Chapman and
Hall: London, 1995; Vol. 2, pp 24-65.
Figure 1. Substrate cavity and O2 access channel of SLO shown as a
white surface. The substrate LA (C, green; H, white; O, red) has been
modeled with C-1 toward the top of the figure, and with the C-9-C-13
moiety of substrate between Ile538 and Gln495 (orange). The postulated
O2 channel, on top of Ile553 (red), intersects the substrate cavity close to
the C-13 position of LA. Leu546 and Leu754 (blue) constrict the LA
channel, preventing O2 access to C-9 of LA. Fe3+-OH is presented as
CPK spheres (Fe, magenta; O, red; H, white).16
(6) Gardner, H. W. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1989, 1001, 274-281.
(7) Minor, W.; Steczko, J.; Stec, B.; Otwinowski, Z.; Bolin, J. T.; Walter,
R.; Axelrod, B. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 10687-10701.
(8) Schwarz, K.; Borngraber, S.; Anton, M.; Kuhn, H. Biochemistry 1998,
37, 15327-15335.
(9) Jisaka, M.; Kim, R. B.; Boeglin, W. E.; Brash, A. R. J. Biol. Chem.
2000, 275, 1287-1293.
(10) Gan, Q. F.; Browner, M. F.; Sloane, D. L.; Sigal, E. J. Biol. Chem.
1996, 271, 25412-25418.
(11) Hornung, E.; Walther, M.; Kuhn, H.; Feussner, I. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 4192-4197.
side channel intersecting the substrate pocket near the reactive
C-11, proposed7 to permit O2 access. The current report details
our investigation into the role played by bulky hydrophobic
residues in controlling the regiospecificity of SLO. Steady-state
kinetics and product distribution data from single-point mutants
of SLO show that Leu546 and Leu754 grant selectivity for 13-(S)-
HPOD by blocking O2 access to C-9 of LA, and that O2 enters
the active site via the postulated side channel. These results
indicate that SLO controls O2 access to the intermediate L•, and
suggest that Fe2+ plays a secondary role in oxygenation.
(12) Nelson, M. J.; Seitz, S. P. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1994, 4, 878-
884.
(13) Gillmor, S. A.; Villasenor, A.; Fletterick, R.; Sigal, E.; Browner, M.
F. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1997, 4, 1003-1009.
(14) Holman, T. R.; Zhou, J.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 12564-12572.
(15) Rickert, K. W.; Klinman, J. P. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 12218-12228.
(16) All modeling was performed using InsightII/Discover software (Bio-
sym/MSI, San Diego, CA). The CVFF force field was used, and the pro-S
hydrogen of LA was constrained to lie within 3.0 Å of the oxygen atom of
Fe(III)-OH. Only residues within the substrate cavity (channel IIa7) were
minimized, with the exception that Fe and its ligands were held fixed. The
internal Connolly surface was constructed by use of a 0.8 Å solvent sphere.
Using a larger solvent sphere (1.4 Å) resulted in a surface that was interrupted
by a few amino acid side chains (Ile553, Leu564) which could easily reorient to
form a continuous surface, as noted before.7
The X-ray crystal structure of SLO revealed the LA pocket,
cavity IIa,7 as a twisted channel, constricted at the Fe3+-OH by
the side chains of Leu546 and Leu754 (Figure 1). A sharp bend
(17) An O2 electrode was used to determine initial rates at constant [LA]
as a function of [O2], at pH 9.0, 20 °C. Kinetic parameters were determined
by nonlinear least-squares fitting to the Michaelis-Menten equation. Rates
were normalized for Fe content of the enzymes (ICP-AES).
(18) Nelson, M. J.; Cowling, R. A.; Seitz, S. P. Biochemistry 1994, 33,
4966-4973.
near Fe3+-OH is introduced by the side chains of Gln495 and Ile538
.
On the basis of extensive experiments with many lipoxygenases8-13
models have been published6,10,11,13 describing substrate binding
in which the reactive C-11 lies near the constriction formed by
10.1021/ja003855k CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 03/06/2001