J. Yu, et al.
DyesandPigments170(2019)107578
found 633.2135. Elemental analysis calcd (%) for
2.2.1. Synthesis of 2,3-dimethylquinoxaline (DMQ)
(M
+
H)+
,
2,4-Pentanedione (0.50 mmol) and 1, 2-phenylendiamine
(0.55 mmol) were added into glacial CH3COOH (4.0 mL). The solution
was stirred at 60 °C for 2 h. Then, the mixture was poured into ice and
extracted with 1,2-dichloromethane. The organic layer was dried with
Na2SO4 and purified with silica-gel column chromatography using
petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (v:v = 5:1) as eluent [20].
C40H32N4S2: C, 75.92; H, 5.10; N, 8.85; S, 10.13. Found: C, 75.60; H,
4.941; N, 8.82; S, 10.451.
2.2.6. Synthesis of 9-ethyl-3-(2-(3-methylquinoxaline-2-yl) vinyl-9H-
carbazole (DMQB1)
By following the synthesis procedure of DMQA1, DMQB1 was ob-
tained. The crude product was purified with petroleum ether/1,2-di-
chloromethane (v:v = 1:3) as eluent. Yellow-green product was ob-
tained. Yield: 68%; m.p. 122–125 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.04
(dd, J = 16.2, 7.5 Hz, 3H), 7.84 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.78–7.64 (m, 2H),
7.43 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.23–7.09 (m, 4H),
6.80 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 1H), 4.28 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.56 (s, 3H), 1.37
(t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.60, 150.40,
141.65, 141.04, 140.66, 140.46, 138.81, 129.04, 128.82, 128.69,
128.28, 127.68, 126.12, 125.53, 123.44, 122.98, 120.62, 120.38,
119.60, 119.41, 108.80, 37.76, 23.28, 13.90. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for
2.2.2. Synthesis of 10-ethyl-10H-phenothiazine-3-carbaldehyede (PAD)
As reported in the literature [21], 1.6 mL Phosphorus oxychloride
was added into 5.0 mL N,N-Dimethylformamide dropwise at 0 °C under
continuous stirring for 40 min. After the brown-red mixture was
formed, 10-methyl-10H-phenothiazine (3.40 g, 16.00 mmol) in 20 mL
DMF was added dropwise in ice-bath under vigorous stirring, and then
the reaction mixture was heated at 60 °C for 14 h. After that, the red
reaction-mixture was poured into ice slowly and the pH of the solution
was adjusted to 7.0 using sodium hydroxide. The organic layer was
extracted with dichloromethane and dried over anhydrous magnesium
sulfate. Then, the solution was removed by vacuum evaporation and the
residue was purified with silica-gel column chromatography using
petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (v:v = 6:1) as eluent. Yellow powder was
obtained. Yield: 85%.
C
25H21N3: 364.1803 (M + H)+, found 364.1806. Elemental analysis
calcd (%) for C25H21N3: C, 82.61; H, 5.82; N, 11.56. Found: C, 80.34; H,
6.03; N, 11.44.
2.2.7. Synthesis
of
2,3-bis-2-(9H-ethyl-9H-carbazol-3-yl)
vinyl)
quinoxaline (DMQB2)
2.2.3. Synthesis of 10-ethyl-10H-carbazole-3-carbaldehyede (CBD)
The synthesis process of 10-ethyl-10H-carbazole-3-carbaldehyede is
similar to that of 10-ethyl-10H-phenothiazine-3-carbaldehyede. White
powder was obtained. Yield: 83% [22].
Similar to the synthesis procedure of DMQA2, DMQB2 was syn-
thesized. The crude product was purified with petroleum ether/1,2-
dichloromethane (v:v = 1:2) as eluent. Green product was obtained.
Yield: 35%; m.p. 300–301 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.45 (s, 2H),
8.26 (d, J = 15.5 Hz,2H), 8.18 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 8.13–8.04 (m, 2H),
7.89 (dd, J = 8.5, 1.4 Hz, 2H), 7.77 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 2H), 7.72–7.63 (m,
2H), 7.55–7.40 (m, 6H), 7.33–7.20 (m, 2H), 4.41 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 4H),
1.48 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 149.79, 141.58,
140.57, 140.46, 138.99, 129.01, 128.77, 127.93, 126.08, 125.53,
123.43, 123.02, 120.69, 120.43, 120.09, 119.37, 108.82, 108.78,
2.2.4. Synthesis
of
10-ethyl-3-(2-(3-methylquinoxaline-2-yl)-10H-
pehnothiazine (DMQA1)
THF (5 mL) was slowly added into the mixture of NaH (70%, 0.15 g,
4.50 mmol) and 2,3-dimethylquinoxaline (0.63 g, 4.00 mmol) at 0 °C
under vigorous stirring for 45 min. After that, the 10-ethyl-10H-phe-
nothiazine-3-carbaldehyede (1.00 g, 4.00 mmol) in THF solution was
added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at room temperature under
nitrogen atmosphere for 16 h and poured into ice, then neutralized with
5% HCl solution. After extracted with 1,2-dichloromethane and washed
with water, the organic layer was separated with silica-gel column
37.79, 13.84. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C40H32N4: 569.2694 (M + H)+
,
found 569.2699. Elemental analysis calcd (%) for C40H32N4: C, 84.48;
H, 5.67; N, 9.85. Found: C, 80.92; H, 5.886; N, 9.46.
3. Results and discussion
chromatography
using
petroleum
ether/1,2-dichloromethane
(v:v = 1:2) as eluent. Yellow product was obtained after recrystalliza-
tion. Yield: 62%; m.p. 171–174 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ
8.09–8.00 (m, 1H), 7.99–7.87 (m, 2H), 7.75–7.58 (m, 2H), 7.43 (d,
J = 16.5 Hz, 2H), 7.33 (s, 1H), 7.21–7.09 (m, 2H), 6.99–6.82 (m, 3H),
3.96 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H), 2.87 (s, 3H), 1.45 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.55, 149.91, 145.64, 144.15, 141.53, 141.12,
136.29, 130.86, 129.10, 128.92, 128.81, 128.28, 127.67, 127.42,
125.63, 124.53, 123.54, 122.71, 120.55, 115.16, 114.92, 42.05, 23.16,
12.96. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C25H21N3S: 396.1529 (M + H)+, found
396.1535. Elemental analysis calcd (%) for C25H21N3S: C, 75.92; H,
5.35; N, 10.62; S, 8.11. Found: C, 75.33; H, 5.35; N, 10.36; S, 8.02.
3.1. Synthesis
DMQs were synthesized from the condensation between DMQ,
phenothiazine and carbazole derivatives. NMR spectroscopy and high-
resolution mass spectrometry were employed to confirm the structures
of the four compounds (Figs. S1, S2, S3 and S4 ESI).
3.2. Photophysical property
As shown in Fig. S5, UV–vis absorption spectra of these four DMQs
in DCM were quite similar. They all displayed two absorption peaks.
The maximum absorption peak was attributed to the intramolecular
charge transfer (ICT) transition and the other one was referred to the π-
2.2.5. Synthesis of 2,3-bis-2-(10H-ethyl-10H-phenothiazin-3-yl-vinyl)
quinoxaline (DMQA2)
The synthesis of DMQA2 is similar to that of DMQA1, DMQA2 was
obtained from 2,3-dimethylquinoxaline (0.63 g, 4.00 mmol) and 10-
ethyl-10H-phenothiazine-3-carbaldehyede (2.00 g, 8.00 mmol) with
NaH (70%, 0.31 g, 9.00 mmol) as the base. The crude product was
purified with petroleum ether/1,2-dichloromethane (v:v = 1:2) as
eluent. Light orange product was obtained. Yield: 43%; m.p.
216–218 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.00 (dt, J = 16.5, 3.2 Hz,
2H), 7.88 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 2H), 7.69–7.61 (m, 2H), 7.47 (dd, J = 11.6,
9.9 Hz, 6H), 7.20–7.12 (m, 4H), 6.94–6.87 (m, 6H), 3.97 (q, J = 7.0 Hz,
4H), 1.46 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 149.17,
145.55, 144.21, 141.56, 136.65, 130.99, 129.23, 128.78, 127.46,
127.44, 127.39, 125.91, 124.45, 123.61, 122.67, 120.58, 115.14,
114.96, 42.06, 12.99. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C40H32N4S2: 633.2136
Considering their D-π-A structures and explicit ICT effect, solvato-
chromism performance was examined. As described in Fig. 1, these four
fluorophores all exhibited fantastic solvatochromism. The emission of
DMQA1, DMQA2, DMQB1, and DMQB2 was located at 510 nm, 520 nm,
437 nm, 449 nm in cyclohexane and red-shifted to 599 nm, 637 nm,
522 nm, and 538 nm in DMF, respectively, accompanied with a quickly
decreased emission intensity. Generally, this significant red-shift ten-
dency can be explained by the larger polarity of the excited state than
the ground state during π-π∗ transition process, which contributes to a
greater solvent stabilization effect on the excited state [24].
As to gain further insight into the solvochromic properties of these
compounds, their frontier orbital distributions were calculated with
Gaussian 09. Depicted in Fig. 2, the highest occupied molecular orbitals
3