C
Synlett
J. B. Williamson et al.
Letter
methoxypyridine products 13b and 13c were obtained,
however, the isolated yield for these products was low (10%
and 13%). Attempts to improve the reaction yield efficiency
by varying temperature, stoichiometry, or base were met
without success.
Reactions performed with the methyl-substituted dihy-
drooxazinone precursor 5b gave more consistent results
with each of the three benzaldehyde reaction components
(5) (a) Margrey, K. M.; Hazzard, A. D.; Scheerer, J. R. Org. Lett. 2014,
16, 904. (b) Leibowitz, M. K.; Winter, E. S.; Scheerer, J. R. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2015, 56, 6069.
(
6) (a) Rogiers, J.; Wu, X. J.; Toppet, S.; Compernolle, F.; Hoornaert,
G. J. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 8971. (b) De Borggraeve, W.;
Rombouts, F.; Van der Eycken, E.; Hoornaert, G. J. Synlett 2000,
713. (c) Wu, X. J.; Dubois, K.; Rogiers, J.; Toppet, S.;
Compernolle, F.; Hoornaert, G. J. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 3043.
(d) Van der Eycken, E.; Deroover, G.; Toppet, S. M.; Hoornaert, G.
J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 9147. (e) Medaer, B. P.; Hoornaert,
G. J. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 3987. (f) Medaer, B. P.; Vanaken, K. J.;
Hoornaert, G. J. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 8813. (g) Medaer, B.;
Vanaken, K.; Hoornaert, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 9767.
(
10–12), and the desired products 14a, 14b, and 14c were
obtained in 58, 54, and 61% yield. Use of 5-phenyl dihydro-
oxazinone 5c was also successful in the reaction sequence
with the alkynyl benzaldehyde derivatives 10–12 and af-
forded the respective tricyclic products 15a, 15b, and 15c in
(h) Vanaken, K. J.; Lux, G. M.; Deroover, G. G.; Meerpoel, L.;
Hoornaert, G. J. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 5211. (i) Fannes, C.;
Meerpoel, L.; Toppet, S.; Hoornaert, G. Synthesis 1992, 705.
(j) Fannes, C. C.; Hoornaert, G. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33,
32%, 22%, and 50% yield. Overall, reactions with the 5-alkyl
dihydrooxazinones 5b or 5c did not benefit from slow addi-
tion of aldehyde; as such these reactions did not require the
syringe pump and were thus more convenient to execute. In
all reactions performed, the unpurified reaction products
were uncomplicated and contained desired products and
unreacted starting materials and only trace impurities. Ac-
cordingly, we attribute the modest yields in several cases to
poor mass recovery, a feature consistent with the observed
propensity of the dihydrooxazinone precursors to degrade
and polymerize.
The reaction sequence described in this letter demon-
strates the proof of principle of a domino reaction sequence
that features several base-promoted and pericyclic bond-
forming and bond-cleaving processes. The sequence is initi-
ated by condensation of novel dihydrooxazinone starting
materials with aromatic aldehyde precursors. The ensuing
alkene isomerization to the intermediate oxazinone pre-
cedes merged cycloaddition and cycloreversion sequence
2049. (k) Tutonda, M. G.; Vandenberghe, S. M.; Vanaken, K. J.;
Hoornaert, G. J. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 2935. (l) Vanaken, K. J.;
Meerpoel, L.; Hoornaert, G. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 2713.
(m) Meerpoel, L.; Hoornaert, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 3183.
(
7) (a) Roughley, S. D.; Jordan, A. M. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 3451.
(b) Michael, J. P. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005, 22, 627. (c) Henry, G. D.
Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 6043. (d) Joule, J. A.; Mills, K. Heterocyclic
Chemistry; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, 2000, 4th ed. 63.
(8) Selected reviews: (a) Varela, J. A.; Saá, C. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103,
3
787. (b) Gulevich, A. V.; Dudnik, A. S.; Chernyak, N.; Gevorgyan,
V. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 3084. (c) Hill, M. D. Chem. Eur. J. 2010,
6, 12052. (d) Bull, J. A.; Mousseau, J. J.; Pelletier, G.; Charette, A.
1
B. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 2642. (e) Nakao, Y. Synthesis 2011,
3209.
(9) (a) Allais, C.; Grassot, J. M.; Rodriguez, J.; Constantieux, T. Chem.
Rev. 2014, 114, 10829. (b) Kral, K.; Hapke, M. Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2011, 50, 2434.
10) See Supporting Information for procedures that accompany
Scheme 2 and the spectra and corresponding characterization
data for all new compounds (including 5a–c, 13b,c, 14a–c, 15a–c).
(
(
evolving CO ) to give 2-methoxypyridine products. The
2
(11) Representative Procedure for the Domino Reaction Leading
to Tricyclic Pyridine Product 13a
overall multicomponent domino reaction process is pro-
moted with mild organic base (DBU) and occurs at conve-
niently accessible temperatures (110 °C).
Dihydrooxazinone 5a (50 mg, 0.38 mmol) was dissolved in
toluene (3.0 mL, 0.12 M) and DBU (85 μL, 0.57 mmol, 1.5 equiv)
was added. The reaction vessel was heated in an oil bath to a
gentle reflux (110 °C) and 2-alkynyl benzaldehyde 10 (74 mg,
Acknowledgment
1
.5 equiv) in toluene (1.0 mL) was introduced slowly to the reac-
tion over 2 h (using a syringe pump). After stirring for 18 h at
10 °C, the reaction was cooled to r.t., transferred to a separa-
The authors acknowledge support from the National Institutes of
Health (R15 GM107702 to J.R.S.).
1
tory funnel, and partitioned between sat. aq NH Cl (10 mL) and
4
EtOAc (10 mL). The organic layer was removed, and the aqueous
portion was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined
Supporting Information
organic layers were washed with brine (10 mL), dried (Na SO ),
filtered through Celite, and concentrated in vacuo. The resulting
residue (82 mg) was purified by flash column chromatography
Supporting information for this article is available online at
2
4
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1588729.
S
u
p
p
ortioIgnfrm oaitn
S
u
p
p
ortioIgnfrm oaitn
References and Notes
on silica gel (gradient elution: 20% → 80% of CHCl in hexane) to
3
afford compound 13a (57 mg, 77% yield) as a light yellow oil;
R = 0.20 (50% CHCl –Hex). IR (film): 1586, 1463, 1307, 1029,
(1) Present address: J. B. Williamson, Department of Chemistry,
f
3
–1 1
The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
2) (a) Tietze, L. F.; Brasche, G.; Gericke, K. M. Domino Reactions in
Organic Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2006. (b) Tietze, L. F.;
Modi, A. Med. Res. Rev. 2000, 20, 304. (c) Tietze, L. F. Chem. Rev.
772 cm . H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ): δ = 7.88 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1 H),
3
(
7.62 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.52 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.34 (t, J = 7.4 Hz,
1 H), 7.26 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.00 (s, 3 H), 3.87 (s, 2 H). 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl ): δ = 163.9, 162.5, 140.4, 139.8, 130.0, 128.4,
3
1
996, 96, 115.
126.9, 126.0, 125.0, 119.2, 108.7, 53.7, 38.6. HRMS: m/z calcd for
+
(
(
3) Gaich, T.; Baran, P. S. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 4657.
4) (a) Margrey, K. A.; Chinn, A. J.; Laws, S. W.; Pike, R. D.; Scheerer,
J. R. Org. Lett. 2012, 43, 2458. (b) Laws, S. W.; Scheerer, J. R.
J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 2422.
C13H NONa [M + Na] : 198.0913; found: 198.0913.
9
©
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York — Synlett 2017, 28, A–C