Synlett, 2000, 1433; (e) M. Sridhar, S. K. Vadivel and U. T.
Bhalerao, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 5695; (f) M. Takemoto, Y.
Suzuki and K. Tanaka, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 8499; (g) T.
Temma and S. Habaue, Tetrahedron Lett., 2005, 46, 5655; (h) K.
H. Kim, D.-W. Lee, Y.-S. Lee, D.-H. Ko and D.-C. Ha, Tetra-
hedron, 2004, 60, 9037; (i) H. Aoyama, M. Tokunaga, J. Kiyosu, T.
Iwasawa, Y. Obora and Y. Tsuji, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127,
10474; (j) T. Temma, B. Hatano and S. Habaue, Tetrahedron, 2006,
62, 8559; (k) X. Xie, P.-W. Phuan and M. C. Kozlowski, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 2168; (l) J. Gao, H. Reibenspies and A.
E. Martell, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 6008; (m) X. Li, J. B.
Hewgley, C. A. Mulrooney, J. Yang and M. S. Kozlowski, J. Org.
Chem., 2003, 68, 5500; (n) M. C. Kozlowski, X. Li, P. J. Carroll
and Z. Xu, Organometallics, 2002, 21, 4513; (o) C. A. Mulrooney,
X. Li, E. S. DiVirgilio and M. C. Kozlowski, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2003, 125, 6856; (p) C. A. Mulrooney, X. Li, E. S. DiVirgilio and
M. C. Kozlowski, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 6856.
3 (a) C.-Y. Chu, D.-R. Hwang, S.-K. Wang and B.-J. Uang, Chem.
Commun., 2001, 980; (b) C.-Y. Chu and B.-J. Uang, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 2003, 14, 53; (c) N. B. Barhate and C.-T. Chen, Org.
Lett., 2002, 4, 2529; (d) S.-W. Hon, C.-H. Li, J.-H. Kuo, N. B.
Barhate, Y.-H. Liu, Y. Wang and C.-T. Chen, Org. Lett., 2001, 3,
869; (e) M. Tada, N. Kojima, Y. Izumi, T. Taniike and Y.
Iwasawa, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 9905; (f) M. Tada, T.
Taniike, L. K. Kantam and Y. Iwasawa, Chem. Commun., 2004,
2542; (g) S. Habaue, S. Murakami and H. Higashimura, J. Polym.
Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem., 2005, 43, 5872; (h) Z. Luo, Q. Liu, L.
Gong, X. Cui, A. Mi and Y. Jiang, Chem. Commun., 2002, 914; (i)
Z. Luo, Q. Liu, L. Gong, X. Cui, A. Mi and Y. Jiang, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 4532.
4 (a) H. Somei, Y. Asano, T. Yoshida, S. Takizawa, H. Yamataka
and H. Sasai, Tetrahedron Lett., 2004, 45, 1841; (b) K. Matsui, S.
Takizawa and H. Sasai, Tetrahedron Lett., 2005, 46, 1943; (c) D.
Jayaprakash, S. Takizawa, T. Arai and H. Sasai, J. Exp. Nanosci.,
2006, 1, 477; (d) K. Matsui, S. Takizawa and H. Sasai, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 3680; (e) K. Matsui, S. Takizawa and H.
Sasai, Synlett, 2006, 761; (f) T. Arai, T. Sekiguti, K. Otsuki, S.
Takizawa and H. Sasai, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 2144; (g)
S. Takizawa, H. Somei. D. Jayaprakash and H. Sasai, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 5711.
5 (a) G. A. Sawatzky and D. Post, Phys. Rev. B, 1979, 20, 1546; (b)
V. D. Pawar, S. Bettigeri, S.-S. Weng, J.-Q. Kao and C.-T. Chen, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 6308.
6 The pre-edge peak position (5468.0 eV) of the crystal, as deter-
mined by X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) analysis,
is comparable to that of the dinuclear vanadium(V) complex
(Ra,S,S)-2a (5468.0 eV) and the mononuclear vanadium(V) complex
(S)-3 (5468.0 eV).
were observed. The reaction under O2 afforded (S)-BINOL in
quantitative yield with 71% ee (entry 1). Although the reaction
rate was slightly decreased under air, (S)-BINOL was obtained
in 96% yield with higher enantioselectivity (85% ee) than that
produced under O2 (entry 2). Lowering the temperature to
0 1C (entry 3) led to an increase in the selectivity to 90% ee
(entry 3). The reaction rate of mononuclear vanadium(V)
catalyst (S)-3 was quite low in comparison with that of
(Ra,S,S)-2a when using 10 mol% of (S)-3 (entry 4). The higher
reaction rate and enantioselectivity obtained using the com-
plex (Ra,S,S)-2a as compared to those obtained using (S)-3
can be attributed to the simultaneous activation of two
molecules of 2-naphthol to form BINOL.9a
We then examined the coupling reaction of various
2-naphthol derivatives. These results are summarized in
Table 2. Electron donating and withdrawing substituents at
the C6, C7 positions of 2-naphthol resulted in coupling
products with good enantioselectivities. Although 9-phenan-
throl was found to be an adequate substrate (entry 7), append-
ing a substituent at the C3 position (R1 = OMe, CO2Me) led
to the corresponding products with diminished yield and ee
(entries 8 and 9). These C3 substituted 2-naphthols barely
approach vanadium on the catalyst due to steric hindrance.
The best outcome in terms of enantioselectivity was achieved
using the dinuclear vanadium(V) complex (Ra,S,S)-2b bearing
a H8-BINOL backbone (Fig. 1).10 (S)-BINOLs were obtained
in 97% ee when using (Ra,S,S)-2b (entries 14 and 15). In
conclusion, we have developed chiral dinuclear vanadium(V)
catalysts with high catalytic activity for the oxidative coupling
of 2-naphthols. Large-scale application of the dinuclear vana-
dium(V) catalysts is currently in progress. After preparation of
this manuscript, a paper by Gong and co-workers was pub-
lished, in which dinuclear vanadium(V) catalysts bearing a
V–O–V linkage were employed for the synthesis of BINOLs.
These catalysts were found to promote oxidative coupling of
2-naphthols with high enantioselectivity.11
7 The magnetic susceptibilities of VOSO4 and V2O5 as vanadium(IV)
and (V) standards are 38 and 0 emu molꢀ1, respectively.
8 H.-C. Zhang, W.-S. Huang and L. Pu, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 481.
9 (a) Catalysis of 2-naphthol coupling by complexes (Ra,S,S)-1,
(Ra,S,S)-2a and (S)-3 obeyed second-order kinetics for up to about
15 h. The calculated rate constants for the coupling reactions using
(Ra,S,S)-1, (Ra,S,S)-2a and (S)-3 as catalysts were k(R ,S,S)-1
=
a
0.1738 Mꢀ1 hꢀ1, k(R ,S,S)-2a = 0.4000 Mꢀ1 hꢀ1, and k(S)-3 = 0.0850
a
M
ꢀ1 hꢀ1, respectively; (b) an induction period was observed when
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
Science and Technology, Japan. We thank Dr Masao Taka-
hashi for XPS analyses, Dr Shuichi Emura for XANES
analyses, and the technical staff of the ISIR Materials Analysis
Center at Osaka University.
(Ra,S,S)-1 was used for the coupling of 2-naphthols. The % ee of
the product increases during the course of the reaction when using
(Ra,S,S)-1, from 38% ee at 4% conversion to 86% ee at 14%
conversion, while the % ee of the product stays nearly constant
(83–85% ee) when using (Ra,S,S)-2a; (c) in the coupling of 2-
naphthol using 5 mol% of (Ra,S,S)-2a under Ar, BINOL was
formed in only 9% yield after 48 h due to prevention of regenera-
tion of the active vanadium(V) complex from the inactive
vanadium(IV) complex in the absence of air. Purging the above
solution with air led to the reaction occuring smoothly, producing
BINOL in a total yield of 99%.
Notes and references
1 (a) J. M. Brunel, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 857; (b) B. E. Love, Curr.
Org. Synth., 2006, 3, 169.
10 D. J. Cram, R. C. Helgeson, S. C. Peacock, L. J. Kaplan, L. A.
Domeier, P. Moreau, K. Koga, J. M. Mayer, Y. Chao, M. G.
Siegel, D. H. Hoffman and G. D. Y. Sogah, J. Org. Chem., 1978,
43, 1930.
11 Q.-X. Guo, Z.-J. Wu, Z.-B. Luo, Q.-Z. Liu, J.-L. Ye, S.-W.
Luo, L.-F. Cun and L.-Z. Gong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129,
13927.
2 (a) M. Smrcina, J. Polakova, S. Vyskocil and P. Kocovsky,
J. Org. Chem., 1993, 58, 4534; (b) M. Nakajima, I. Miyoshi, K.
Kanayama, S. Hashimoto, M. Noji and K. Koga, J. Org.
Chem., 1999, 64, 2264; (c) X. Li, J. Yang and M. C. Kozlowski,
Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 1137; (d) R. Irie, K. Matsutani and T. Katsuki,
ꢁc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
1812 | Chem. Commun., 2008, 1810–1812