These shape-persistent objects with nanometer sizes exhibit
interesting aggregation properties.8 Some of these compounds
can self-assemble into nanowires and other supramolecular
structures as a result of π-π stacking interactions. On the
other hand, generational dendrimers containing all-thiophene
units have not been reported in the literature even though
their macrocyclic,9 tubular,10 and linear analogues have been
extensively studied. However, the optical, electronic, and
self-assembly properties of thiophene dendrimers may be
intriguing because of their spatial arrangement and micro-
structure. The intrinsic asymmetric structure can result in
different conjugation lengths, resulting in broad absorption,
which has been recently observed for another asymmetric
polyphenyl acetylene dendrimer.11
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Thiophene Dendrons
In this paper, we present our design and synthesis strategy
for a series of thiophene dendrons and dendrimers, using
mainly a convergent synthesis methodology. The purpose
of this macromolecule architecture is to investigate photo-
chemical and physical properties resulting in (1) unusual
broad absorption, rendering it a good candidate for an
antenna molecule;12 (2) formation of regular 2-D supramo-
lecular structures on graphite or gold surfaces and confor-
mational change induced through different bias;13 and (3)
formation of self-stacked long-ranged ordered structures.
Scheme 1 shows the synthetic route for the thiophene
dendrons. The key starting material for the synthesis is 2,3-
dibromothiophene, which is commercially available. In a
convergent synthetic sequence, 2,3-dibromothiophene acts
as an AB2 type monomer. A C-C bond can form through
the C-Br group at the 2,3 positions using metal-mediated
coupling. The fifth position can undergo other transforma-
tions for further coupling reactions, in our case, Stille
coupling. 2-Bromo-5-hexylthiophene was synthesized from
thiophene by treating with butyllithium and 1-bromohexane,
followed by bromination with NBS/DMF. The pure product
was obtained by distillation under reduced pressure; 3T was
made with an excellent yield (90%) using the Kumada
method.14 Although the Grignard coupling could be used to
continue the synthesis, the ease of the Stille coupling15
reaction attracted our attention. As has been well docu-
mented, Stille coupling offers efficient C-C bond formation
for heterocycles such as thiophenes. The tolerance of a
variety of functional groups makes it very useful for modern
synthesis. In addition, the reaction is easy to perform.
Harmful oxygen can be easily removed by simply doing
several freeze-thaw cycles.
Compound 3T was readily lithiated using butyllithium and
reacted with tributyltin chloride to give the stannyl compound
for the following Stille coupling. There was no 3T left after
this reaction, and hence, this compound, which is liable to
acids, was used without further purification. An excess of
the stannyl compound was used to ensure completion of the
coupling reaction. No monocoupled product was detected
from the NMR. The efficiency of the coupling decreases as
the product becomes more crowded around the focal point
thiophene, i.e., 7T was synthesized with 90% yield and 15T
(4) For books and reviews about dendrimers, see: (a)Bosman, A. W.;
Janssen, H. M.; Meijer, E. W. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 1665. (b) Fischer, M.;
Vogtle, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 884. (c) Grayson, S. M.; Fre´chet,
J. M. J. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 3819. (d) Zimmerman, S. C. Chem. ReV.
1997, 97, 1681. (e) Dendrimers; Vo¨gtle, F., Ed.; Topics in Current
Chemistry, Vol. 197; Springer: Berlin, 1998. (f) Dendrimers II: Archi-
tecture, Nanostructure and Supramolecular Chemistry; Vo¨gtle, F., Ed.;
Topics in Current Chemistry, Vol. 210; Springer: Berlin, 2000. (g)
Dendrimers III: Design, Dimension, Function; Vo¨gtle, F., Ed.; Topics in
Current Chemistry, Vol. 212; Springer: Berlin, 2001. (h) Dendrimers IV:
Metal Coordination, Self-Assembly, Catalysis; Vo¨gtle, F.; Schalley, C. A.,
Eds.; Topics in Current Chemistry, Vol. 217; Springer: Berlin, 2001.
(5) (a) Moore, J. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 402. (b) Devadoss, C.;
Bharathi, P.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9635. (c) Gong,
L.; Hu, Q.; Pu, L. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 2358.
(6) (a) Deb, S. K.; Maddux, T. M.; Yu, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
9079. (b) Meier, H.; Lehmann, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37,
643. (c) Lupton, J. M.; Samuel, I. D. W.; Beavington, R.; Burn, P. L.;
Bassler, H. AdV. Mater. 2001, 13, 258.
(7) Berresheim, A. J.; Mu¨ller, M.; Mu¨llen, K. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 1747.
(8) Hampel, C.; Bauer, R.; Wiesler, U. M.; Mu¨llen, K. Langmuir 2002,
18, 2398. (b) Liu, D.; Zhang, H.; Grim, P. C. M.;. De Feyter, S.; Wiesler,
U.-M.; Berresheim, A. J.; Mu¨llen, K.; De Schryver, F. C. Langmuir 2002
18, 2385.
(9) (a) Fuhrmann, G.; Kromer, J.; Ba¨uerle, P. Synth. Met. 2001, 119,
125. (b) Kromer, J.; Rios-Carreras, I.; Fuhrmann, G.; Musch, C.; Wunderlin,
M.; Debaerdemaeker, T.; Mena-Osteritz, E.; Ba¨uerle, P. Angew. Chem. 2000,
39, 3481.
(10) Marsella, M. J.; Yoon, K.; Tham, F. S. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2129.
(11) Peng, Z.; Pan, Y.; Xu, B.; Zhang, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122,
6619.
(12) (a) Gilat S. L.; Adronov, A.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 1422 (b) Stewart, G. M.; Fox, M. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 4354.
(13) Donhauser, Z. J.; Mantooth, B. A.; Kelly, K. F.; Bumm, L. A.;
Monnell, J. D.; Stapleton, J. J.; Price, D. W., Jr.; Rawlett, A. M.; Allara,
D. L.; Tour. J. M.; Weiss, P. S. Science 2001, 292, 2303.
(14) (a) Tamao, K.; Sumitani, K.; Kumada, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972,
94, 4374. (b) Kumada, M. Pure Appl. Chem. 1980, 52, 669. (c) Tamao, K.;
Kodama, K.; Nakajima, I.; Kumada, M. Tetrahedron 1982, 38, 3347.
(15) (a) Stille, J. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1986, 25, 508. (b)
Katz, H. E.; Laquindanum, J. G.; Lovinger, A. J. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10,
633. (c) Wei, Y.; Yang, Y.; Yeh, J. M. Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 2659.
2068
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 12, 2002