Transformations of chiral rhodium catalyst
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 50, No. 10, October, 2001
1859
p-xyleneCD OD and mesityleneCD OD mixtures
was isolated and dried and a finely crystalline white compound
3
3
was obtained, m.p. 182188 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl ), δ: 1.14 (s,
3
1
(
the arene content was 5%) by P NMR spectroscopy.
3
6
H, CH ); 2.63 and 2.87 (both m, 2 H each, CH ); 4.18 (m,
3 2
The spectra of the solvate complexes with various arenes
as well as the spectrum of the deactivated catalyst are
shown in Fig. 2. In the case of p-xylene, the 31P NMR
spectrum has signals of complexes 1 and 3 as well as a
2
H, CH); 7.437.78 (m, 20 H, Ph). For comparison, the
1
H NMR spectrum of DIOP has signals of these groups at
δ 1.33, 2.30, 2.42, 3.89, and 7.247.43, respectively. 31P NMR
CDCl ), δ: 31.18, 30.16. IR (KBr pellets), ν/cm1: 530, 690,
(
3
doublet at δ
31P
31.01 (1JRhP = 201.2 Hz) belonging to
715, 1108, 1180, 1435.
complex 2b, which contains the p-xylene molecule in
the coordination sphere. In the case of mesitylene,
arene complex 2ñ was formed along with complexes 1,
The specimen of the artificially deactivated catalyst was
obtained upon storage of complex 1 in an MeOHEt2O sol-
vent mixture (1 : 1) for 6 months.
The substrates were hydrogenated with intense stirring in a
glass temperature-controlled long-necked reactor connected
with a manometer and a system for supplying hydrogen. The
3
, and 4. Complex 2ñ gives a doublet signal at δ
31P
30.3
1
with JRhP = 204.2 Hz. Judging from the positions of
the signals of the solvate complexes, the bond between
p-xylene and the rhodium atom is the weakest one,
which facilitates coordination of the substrate and the
interconversion of olefinic intermediates resulting in the
maximum optical yield (see Table 1).
gas was purified and dried according to a standard procedure.
The products were isolated and analyzed as described previously.1
References
Hence, the nature of the arene ligand exerts a sig-
nificant effect on the activity and enantioselectivity of
complex 1 in hydrogenation of prochiral substrates.
1. L. O. Nindakova, B. A. Shainyan, A. I. Albanov, and M. V.
Ustinov, Zh. Org. Khim., 2000, 35, 1660 [Russ. J. Org.
Chem., 2000, 35 (Engl. Transl.)].
2
3
4
. H. B. Kagan and T.-P. Dang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1972,
4, 6429.
. D. Sinou and H. B. Kagan, J. Organomet. Chem., 1976,
14, 325.
. J. Reiss and J. Hetflejs, Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun.,
986, 51, 340.
9
Experimental
1
The IR spectra were recorded on a Specord IR 75 instru-
ment. The NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker DPX-400
1
spectrometer operating at 400 (1H) and 162 MHz (31P) in the
5. J. M. Brown, P. A. Chaloner, A. G. Kent, B. A. Murrer,
P. N. Nicholson, D. Parker, and P. J. Sidebottom,
J. Organomet. Chem., 1981, 216, 263.
6. A. J. Kirby and S. G. Warren, The Organic Chemistry of
Phosphorus (Reactions in Organic Chemistry), Elsevier, New
York, 1967.
1
range from +15 to 25 ppm ( H) and from +300 to 150 ppm
(31
P) with HMDS as the internal standard. The chemical shifts
are given relative to Me Si ( H) and H PO (31P). The specific
1
4
3
4
optical rotation of the products was determined on a Polamat A
instrument at 546 nm and was scaled to the wavelength of 58 m
using the coefficient of 1.17543. The solvents used in the
experiments were thoroughly purified and degassed. All synthe-
ses were carried out under an atmosphere of argon with the use
of a system combining the supply of the purified gas and the
possibility to produce rarefaction.
Complex 1 was synthesized according to a procedure simi-
lar to that described15 for the preparation of the perchlorate
complex [Rh(S,S-chiraphos)(NBD)]+ClO4.
7
. D. Purdela and R. Vylchanu, Khimiya organicheskikh
soedinenii fosfora [Chemistry of Organophosphorus Compounds],
Khimiya, Moscow, 1972, 752 pp. (in Russian).
8
. 31P Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, in Topics in Phosphorus
Chemistry, Vol. 5, Eds. M. Grayson and E. J. Griffith, Wiley
and Sons, New YorkLondonSidney, 1967, 489 p.
9. K. Yamamoto and S.-U. Rehman, Chem. Lett., 1984, 1603.
10. E. Dunach and H. B. Kagan, Tetrahedron. Lett., 1985,
2
6, 2649.
Complex 3 was prepared by purging hydrogen through a
solution of complex 1 (26.3 mg, 3.2105 mol) in methanol
11. A. R. Sanger, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1975, 893.
1
1
2. G. W. Parshall, Acc. Chem. Res., 1970, 3, 139.
3. T. Nishiguchi, K. Tanaka, and K. Fukuzumi, J. Organomet.
Chem., 1980, 193, 37.
4. A. S. C. Chan and J. Halpern, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1980,
102, 838.
(
1.5 mL) for 30 min. The solvent was removed from the
resulting red-brown solution and the yellow-brown residue was
dried by heating in vacuo for 1 h. H NMR (CDCl ), δ: 1.24 (s,
6
2
(
1
3
1
H, CH ); 2.62 and 2.87 (both m, 2 H each, CH ); 4.30 (m,
3 2
H, CH); 7.307.75 (m, 20 H, Ph). 3 P NMR, δ: 34.40
1
1
15. M. D. Fryzuk and B. Bosnich, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1977,
9, 6262.
CDCl ); 28.33 (DMSO-d ). IR (KBr pellets), ν/cm : 505,
3
6
9
5
20, 625, 690, 745, 1023, 1156, 1236, 1259, 1435.
Phosphine oxide 8 was synthesized by the reaction of a
solution of DIOP (50 mg, 1103 mol) in acetone (50 mL)
Received January 17, 2001;
in revised form March 26, 2001
with two equivalents of H O2 for 15 min. The reaction product
2