J. Dijkmans et al. / Journal of Catalysis xxx (2015) xxx–xxx
3
overnight in an aqueous HNO3 solution (55 ml/g of zeolite, over-
night at 353 K), an acid concentration of 7.2 M was used. Afterward
the solids were filtered, washed with water and dried at 333 K. All
of the post-synthesis procedures were preceded by an activation of
the dealuminated zeolite at 423 K to remove any physisorbed
water, followed by a calcination step in air at 823 K. Samples made
by an impregnation method (IMP) with SnCl4Á5H2O, containing
2 wt% of Sn w.r.t. dry zeolite powder, were slurried in dry iso-
propanol (5 ml of alcohol per gram of zeolite powder). The solvent
was slowly evaporated at 323 K under vigorous stirring, causing Sn
precipitation onto the zeolite [56]. For samples made by a chemical
vapor deposition (CVD), the procedure described by de Correa et al.
was used [24]. The required amounts of SnCl4 and dealuminated
beta zeolite were placed into a Teflon-lined stainless steel auto-
clave, that was heated at 373 K for 8 h. Materials made by a solid
mixing procedure (Solid-MIX), underwent manual grinding for
several minutes, using a mixture of dealuminated zeolite and
SnCl4Á5H2O powder in the required amounts [56]. Grafting of SnCl4
onto the dealuminated beta zeolite was tested in two different sol-
vents. For the H2O-graft, a procedure described by Zhang et al. was
followed [57]. The second solvent in the grafting procedure was
dried isopropanol (IPA-graft), using a method described by Wagner
et al. for grafting Sn onto mesoporous carrier materials [58]. The
dealuminated zeolite was added to SnCl4Á5H2O (27 mmol/g of zeo-
lite) in water or dry isopropanol (100 ml/g of zeolite) and placed in
a reflux setup under N2 atmosphere. After 7 h, the mixture was fil-
tered in air, rinsed with water or dried isopropanol and dried at
333 K. When varying the Sn-precursor, equimolar amounts of the
new precursor were used. All other synthesis parameters were
kept constant. Metallic Sn0 powder was converted in situ to a
Sn-salt by adding a 4.0 M HCl in 1,4-dioxane-solution (8 moles of
HCl per mole of Sn0) to the isopropanol reflux solution. As the
intended catalytic material is investigated as an alternative for
the hydrothermally (HT) synthesized Snb, this material was syn-
thesized using a procedure described in literature [59]. The
hydrothermally synthesized and post-synthetically treated beta
zeolite crystals used in this work have dimensions, as measured
with SEM of 1000–1500 and 10–30 nm, respectively [49]. This is
far below the limit at which pore diffusion limitations was shown
Agilent 1200 series HPLC equipped with Metacarb 67C column
and RI detector was used. Identification of the products was based
on retention time analysis and confirmed by GC–MS (Agilent 6890
GC with HP5-MS column and Agilent 5973 Mass Selective
À1
Detector). TOFs were calculated as moleproduct mole hÀ1, while
Sn
À1
STY was determined as g
g
hÀ1
.
product catalyst
2.3. Characterization techniques
The Sn-content of the materials was all determined by electron
probe microanalyzer (EPMA) analysis conducted on JEOL
a
JXA-8530F field emission microprobe using WDS. Samples were
embedded in a resin, and the surface was ground, polished and
coated with carbon before measurement. The microprobe was
operated at 10 kV with a probe current of 1.5 nA. The Sn L 1-signal
a
was detected using a PETH crystal and the Sn concentration was
quantified with a cassiterite standard. ZAF was used for the matrix
correction method. Absorption in the UV–vis region was recorded
on an Agilent Cary 5000 spectrophotometer. Samples were placed
in a quartz tube with window, and were dried at 823 K in a dry
N2-flown (unless stated otherwise) before measurement using a
heating rate of 5 K/min. Samples were corrected with a calcined
dealuminated beta zeolite to isolate Sn-related signals. FT-IR mea-
surements of the silanol groups were performed on a Nicolet 6700
Spectrometer equipped with DTGS detector. The materials were
pressed into self-supporting wafers and degassed at 673 K in vacuo
before measurement at 423 K. The broad silanol signal was decon-
voluted into the individual signals using OriginPro 8 software using
fixed FWHM values for the signals between the materials. Lewis
acid sites were probed with deuterated acetonitrile, cyclohexanone
and pyridine as probe molecule. Deuterated acetonitrile was
adsorbed at room temperature. The samples were exposed to
100 mbar of probe molecule for 10 min., afterward desorption in
vacuo of the molecule was followed at the same temperature. For
pyridine adsorption, the samples were subjected to 25 mbar of
the probe until saturation at 323 K. Spectra were recorded at
423 K in vacuo after equilibration for 20 min. 0.89 cm l
molÀ1 was
used as integrated molar extinction coefficient for calculation of
Lewis acid density [60]. For cyclohexanone the samples were
exposed to 6.5 mbar of probe molecule until saturation at room
temperature. Spectra were recorded at different temperatures in
vacuo after equilibration of 10 min. at each heating step. X-ray
diffraction patterns were recorded on a STOE Stadi P diffractometer
to take place (>7 lm [31]). Therefore the catalytic reaction rates
are assumed to be diffusion free and only determined by the
chemical transformations.
2.2. Catalytic tests
equipped with Cu Ka1 source and IP-PSD detector. Before measure-
ment, the samples were stored in a controlled humidity environ-
ment, ie. above an aqueous saturated NH4Cl solution (79%
humidity). 119Sn MAS NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker
DSX400 spectrometer (B0 = 9.4 T) operating at a NMR frequency
of 149.21 MHz. Single-pulse excitation measurements with vary-
ing interscan delays between 5 and 40 s have been used. The sam-
ples were packed in 4 mm zirconia rotor; the spinning frequency of
the rotor was 12,000 Hz. The chemical shift is referenced with
respect to Sn(CH3)4. SnO2 was used as a secondary standard; the
chemical shift of its center band was set at À604.0 ppm [61]. N2
sorption measurements were performed using a Micromeritics
Instruments Tristar 3000 at 77 K. Samples were degassed under
nitrogen flow at 527 K overnight prior to measurement. Pore
volumes were calculated using the t-plot method.
Catalytic tests were performed in magnetically stirred and
closed glass reactors of 10 ml, which were placed in a copper block.
Temperature control is carried out in a reference glass reactor with
solvent. For isomerization reactions, 100 mg of catalyst was added
to 5 ml of a 10 wt% aqueous glucose solution. The reactions were
performed at 383 K. For Baeyer–Villiger reactions, 1.11 mmol of
ketone was added to 50 mg of catalyst in 5 ml of dioxane. 50 wt%
aqueous H2O2 solution was added in a molar H2O2/ketone-ratio
of 2. Ethylcyclohexane was used as the internal standard for chro-
matographic analysis. The reactions were performed at 363 K. Me
erwein–Ponndorf–Verley reactions were performed at 373 K.
15 mg of catalyst was added to a 2-butanol solution containing
1 mmol of ketone, the solvent was used in a 2-butanol/ketone ratio
of 50. 1,4-Dioxane was used as an internal standard. For the con-
version of dihydroxyacetone to ethyl lactate, 1 mmol of substrate
was dissolved in 5 ml of ethanol, 1,4-dioxane was used as internal
standard. 75 mg of catalyst was used. The reaction was performed
at 363 K. For each reaction, aliquots of the sample were taken
at regular time intervals through a rubber septum and were
quantitatively analyzed with an Agilent 6850 GC, equipped with
a HP-1 column and FID detector. For non-volatile products, an
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Catalytic exploration of various post-synthetic Snb materials
The catalysts studied in this work are all synthesized according
to (top down) post-synthesis routes. All procedures start with a
Please cite this article in press as: J. Dijkmans et al., Post-synthesis Snb: An exploration of synthesis parameters and catalysis, J. Catal. (2015), http://