1
3
(
4
1H, br s, NH). C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl ): δ 28.43, 41.92,
3
ϩ
ϩ
3.49, 79.11, 156.30. MS (EI ): m/z 160 (M ).
N-tert-Butoxycarbonyl-NЈ,NЈ-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)ethylene-
diamine (3). To a solution of 2 (2.50 g, 15.6 mmol) in ethanol
100 ml) were added anhydrous sodium carbonate (7.30 g, 68.8
mmol) and 2-(chloromethyl)pyridine hydrochloride (5.60 g,
4.4 mmol). The resulting suspension was heated under reflux
(
3
under Ar overnight (21 h) and evaporated to dryness. The
residue was suspended in 2 M aqueous NaOH (100 ml) and
extracted with dichloromethane three times. The combined
dichloromethane extract was washed with brine, dried over
anhydrous potassium carbonate and evaporated to dryness. The
residue was purified by aluminum oxide column chroma-
tography (n-hexane–dichloromethane, 1 : 1) to give 3 (4.34 g,
1
8
1.2%) as an orange oil. H-NMR (300 MHz; CDCl ; Me Si):
3
4
t
Fig. 1 The water proton relaxivity of 7a (closed triangle) and 7b (open
δ 1.45 (9H, s, Bu ), 2.71 (2H, t, J = 5.7 Hz, C NCH ), 3.23 (2H,
2
2
triangle) at pH 8.0, 25 ЊC in the presence of various concentrations of
Zn : 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 equiv.
m, CONCH ), 3.87 (4H, s, NCCNCH ), 5.79 (1H, br s, NH),
2
2
2ϩ
7
.16 (2H, dd, J = 6.4, 4.1 Hz, 5-H), 7.42 (2H, d, J = 7.7 Hz,
3
-H), 7.64 (2H, dd, J = 7.7, 6.4 Hz, 4-H), 8.55 (2H, d, J = 4.1
5
8.96, 59.52, 63.11, 126.22, 127.23, 144.19, 145.43, 153.33,
ϩ
13
Hz, 6-H). C-NMR (75 MHz; CDCl ): δ 28.48, 38.53, 53.52,
6
3
172.13, 172.67, 173.77, 176.70, 177.95. MS (FAB ): m/z 646
0.22, 78.65, 122.02, 123.03, 136.39, 149.10, 156.16, 159.32. MS
ϩ
(
[M ϩ H] ).
ϩ
ϩ
(
EI ): m/z 342 (M ).
3
؉
Gd DTPA bisamide complex (7a). Compounds 7a and 7b
13
N,N-Bis(2-pyridylmethyl)ethylenediamine (4). A solution of 3
were synthesized according to the literature. Briefly, to a
solution of 6a (120 mg, 0.143 mmol) in Tris buffer (1 M; pH 8.0,
5 ml) was added 100 mM aqueous GdCl (1.57 ml). The result-
(
4.30 g, 12.6 mmol) in dichloromethane (40 ml) was added
dropwise to TFA (100 ml) at 0 ЊC. The mixture was stirred for
h at room temperature and evaporated to dryness. The residue
3
1
ing mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min and
was dissolved in 2 M aqueous NaOH (75 ml) and extracted with
dichloromethane. The combined dichloromethane extract was
dried over anhydrous potassium carbonate and evaporated to
dryness. The residue was purified by aluminum oxide column
purified by HPLC with methanol–H O (3 : 2) as eluent to give
2
7a (71.0 mg, 50.0%) as a colorless solid. Mp > 276 ЊC
Ϫ1
(decomp.). IR (KBr): νmax/cm 3391 (H O), 3260, 3090, 2953,
2
ϩ
ϩ
1624, 1435, 1400, 769. MS (FAB ): m/z 997 ([M ϩ H] ). Anal.
Calcd. (found) for C H N O Gdؒ7.5H O: C, 44.59 (44.65);
chromatography (dichloromethane–methanol; 95 : 5) to give 4
42
52 11
8
2
1
(
1.95 g, 64.1%) as an orange oil. H-NMR (300 MHz; CDCl ;
H, 5.97 (6.02); N, 13.62% (13.40%).
3
Me Si): δ 1.60 (2H, br s, NH ), 2.67 (2H, t, J = 5.7 Hz, CH ),
4
2
2
3
؉
2
.80 (2H, t, J = 5.7 Hz, CH ), 3.85 (4H, s, CCNCH ), 7.15 (2H,
Gd DTPA amide ethyl ester complex (7b). The reaction
mixture was purified by HPLC with methanol–H O (2 : 3) as
eluent. Yield 27.9%. Mp > 237 ЊC (decomp.). IR (KBr):
2
2
dd, J = 7.3, 5.0 Hz, 5-H), 7.49 (2H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3-H), 7.65
2
13
(
2H, dd, J = 7.5, 7.3 Hz, 4-H), 8.53 (2H, m, 6-H). C-NMR (75
Ϫ1
MHz; CDCl ): δ 39.57, 57.34, 60.71, 122.02, 123.05, 136.43,
ν
max/cm 3398 (H O), 3260, 3120, 2980, 1597, 1435, 1404, 1207,
2
ϩ ϩ
3
ϩ
ϩ
1
49.06, 159.58. MS (EI ): m/z 242 (M ).
769. MS (FAB ): m/z 801 ([M ϩ H] ). Anal. Calcd. (found)
for C H N O Gdؒ4.0H O: C, 41.32 (41.31); H, 5.55 (5.49);
30
40
7
9
2
DTPA bisamide (6a). Compounds 6a and 6b were synthesized
according to the literature. Briefly, DTPA bisanhydride (5a,
48 mg, 0.48 mmol) was slowly added to a solution of 4 (200
N, 11.24% (11.02%).
Relaxation time measurement
Relaxation time, T , of aqueous solutions of the Gd complex
12
1
3ϩ
mg, 0.83 mmol) in DMF (1.3 ml) at 50 ЊC and the mixture was
heated under Ar for 4 h at 70 ЊC. The solution was cooled down
and was evaporated to dryness to give a colorless oil. Com-
pound 6a was precipitated from ethanol by the addition of
acetone, washed with acetone and dried under reduced pressure
1
7
a or 7b was measured in Tris buffer (0.1 M; pH 8.0) by using
the standard inversion–recovery procedure (JEOL JNM-
LA300, 25 ЊC). The relaxivity, R , of 7a or 7b was determined
1
from the slope of the plot of 1/T vs. [7a] or [7b] (0.3, 0.5, 0.7,
1
1
3ϩ
to afford a colorless solid (127 mg, 36.5%). H-NMR (300
1
.0 mM). The buffered Gd complex (7a or 7b) solution was
MHz; D O): δ 2.95 (4H, t, J = 6.2 Hz), 3.04 (4H, t, J = 5.7 Hz),
2
allowed to equilibrate for at least 10 min after addition of
ZnCl , CaCl or MgCl aqueous stock solution.
3
.08 (4H, s), 3.17 (4H, t, J = 6.2 Hz), 3.23 (4H, s), 3.38 (4H, t,
J = 5.7 Hz), 3.64 (2H, s), 4.12 (8H, s), 7.37 (4H, t, J = 7.7, 5.3
2
2
2
Hz), 7.42 (4H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.85 (4H, t, J = 7.9, 7.7 Hz), 8.40
13
Results and discussion
(
4H, d, J = 5.3 Hz). C-NMR (75 MHz; D O): δ 37.10, 51.48,
2
5
1
3.97, 55.47, 55.56, 58.72, 59.71, 59.91, 125.64, 126.52, 142.17,
It is known that N,N,NЈ,NЈ-tetrakis(2-pyridylmethyl)ethylene-
ϩ
2ϩ
46.92, 153.61, 171.35, 174.76, 179.19. MS (FAB ): m/z 842
diamine (TPEN) complexes strongly with Zn , but hardly at
ϩ
2ϩ
2ϩ
(
[M ϩ H] ).
all with Ca or Mg . Reactions between primary amines and
DTPA bisanhydride have been widely used in the synthesis of
3ϩ
12
DTPA amide ethyl ester (6b). DTPA amide ethyl ester 6b was
DTPA bisamide chelaters. Therefore, we designed the Gd
DTPA bisamide complex 7a, which contains the TPEN moiety,
prepared by reacting DTPA anhydride ethyl ester 5b with 4
1 equiv.) using the same method as described for DTPA bis-
2ϩ
(
as a Zn -sensitive MRI contrast agent. Compound 7a was
1
amide 6a. Yield 49.6%. H-NMR (300 MHz; D O): δ 1.14 (3H,
t, J = 7.3 Hz), 2.96 (2H, t, J = 5.3 Hz), 3.08 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz),
3
obtained according to the reaction Scheme 1. In characterizing
2
3ϩ
the Gd DTPA bisamide complex 7a, we observed that the
2ϩ
.15 (2H, t, J = 6.6 Hz), 3.25–3.30 (6H, m), 3.40 (2H, t, 5.7 Hz),
water proton R relaxivity of 7a had an unusual Zn depend-
1
3
.42 (2H, s), 3.43 (2H, s), 3.65 (2H, s), 3.70 (2H, s), 4.09 (2H,
ence. The R decreased dose-dependently between 0 and 1.0
equiv. Zn , reaching a minimum at 1.0 equiv. Zn to 7a, then
1
2ϩ
2ϩ
q, J = 7.3 Hz), 4.17 (4H, s), 7.59 (2H, dd, J = 7.5, 5.7 Hz), 7.64
(
2H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 8.10 (2H, dd, J = 8.0, 7.5 Hz), 8.52 (2H,
R increased dose-dependently between 1.0 and 2.0 equiv. (Fig.
1
13
d, J = 5.7 Hz). C-NMR (75 MHz; D O): δ 14.17, 37.32,
5
1). The R relaxivity of the complex 7a decreased approximately
2
1
2ϩ
2ϩ
0.57, 51.90, 53.34, 53.60, 55.51, 55.99, 56.26, 57.83, 57.92,
33% when Zn (1.0 equiv. to 7a) was added to a Zn -free
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 2001, 1840–1843 1841