F. Molinari et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 14 (2003) 2041–2043
2043
35°C, substrate concentration 25–35 mM, speed of
agitation 100–200 rpm.
The control responses to be optimized were the molar
conversion into acid after 2 h and the enantiomeric
excess of the product obtained. Each experiment was
carried out in triplicate.
Analytical methods. The molar conversion was routinely
determined by HPLC analysis using a Polyspher OA
HY column (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and an
aqueous acidic solution (H2SO4 0.005N) as eluent
which allowed for the determination of the concentra-
tion of the substrates and products. Samples (0.5 mL)
were taken at intervals, brought to pH 1 by the addi-
tion of 1 M HCl and extracted with an equal volume of
ethyl acetate. The enantiomeric composition was rou-
tinely determined by gas chromatographic analysis of
the corresponding methyl ester using a chiral capillary
column (diameter 0.25 mm, length 25 m, thickness 0.25
m, DMePeBeta-CDX-PS086, MEGA, Legnano, Italia).
The absolute configuration of the obtained acid was
determined after methylation by comparison with the
specific rotation of the commercially available (Sigma-
Aldrich) enantiomerically pure (R)-3-hydroxy-2-methyl
propionic methyl ester.
Figure 2. Batch-fed biotransformation of 2-methyl-1,3-
propandiol to (R)-HIBA with Acetobacter pasteurianus DSM
8937. The reactions were carried out with the pH maintained
at 7.0 (", diol; ꢀ, acid) or without the adjustment of the pH
(2, diol; ꢁ, acid).
4. Experimental
Microorganisms, growth and biotransformation condi-
tions. Acetic acid bacteria were routinely maintained on
GYC slants (glucose 50 g L−1, yeast extract 10 g L−1,
CaCO3 30 g L−1, agar 15 g L−1, pH 6.3) at 28°C. The
strains, grown on GYC slants for 24 h at 28°C, were
inoculated into 500 ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50
ml of the liquid medium containing yeast extract (10 g
L−1) and different carbon sources (25 g L−1) at pH 5 in
distilled water and incubated on a reciprocal shaker
(100 spm). Acetobacter pasteurianus DSM 8937
(Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen) was
employed in optimization studies accomplished using
cultures grown in a 1 L air-lift reactor.10 Biotransfor-
mations were accomplished using bacteria grown
directly inside the reaction vessel. Neat substrate was
directly added onto suspensions. The control of the pH
was performed by continuous addition of aqueous
NaOH via a multichannel Watson-Marlow 503 U/R
peristaltic pump connected to a pH controller (pH/
ORP Controller 3675, Jenco Electronics). The dry
weights were determined after centrifugation of 100 mL
of cultures, cells were washed with distilled water and
dried at 110°C for 24 h.
References
1. Ohashi, T.; Hasegawa, J. In Chirality in Industry; Collins,
A. N.; Sheldrake, G. N.; Crosby, J., Eds.; John Wiley &
Sons Ltd: Chichester, 1992; p. 249.
2. Hasegawa, J.; Hamaguchi, S.; Ogura, M.; Watanabe, K.
J. Ferment. Technol. 1981, 59, 257–262.
3. Jones, J. B. In Asymmetric catalysis Enzymic and Nonen-
zymic Catalysis; Dunnil, P.; Wiseman, A.; Blakesbrough,
N., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester, 1980; p. 54.
4. Poppe, L.; Novak, L. Selective Biocatalysis Stereochemi-
cal Aspects of Biocatalysis; VCH Verlagsgesellschaft
mbH: Weinheim, 1992; p. 27.
5. Crout, D. H. G.; Christen, M. In Modern Synthetic
Methods Biotransformations in Organic Synthesis; Schef-
fold, R., Ed.; Springer Verlag: Berlin, 1989; Vol. 5, p. 1.
6. Ohta, H.; Tetsukawa, H.; Noto, N. J. Org. Chem. 1982,
47, 2400–2404.
7. Leo´n, R.; Prazeres, D. M. F.; Fernandes, P.; Molinari,
F.; Cabral, J. M. S. Biotehnol. Progr. 2001, 17, 468–473.
8. Geerlof, A.; Jongejan, J. A.; Van Dooren, T. J. M.;
Petronella, C. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1994, 16, 1059–
1063.
9. Molinari, F.; Villa, R.; Aragozzini, F.; Le`on, R.; Praz-
eres, D. M. F. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 3003–
3009.
Optimization by sequential simplex method. The simplex
optimization method was based on the sequential
experimental trials guided by the systematic search
strategies of the Multisimplex® 2.0 program (Multisim-
plex AB, Karlskrona, Sweden). The four starting exper-
iments were selected with levels of each control variable
(growth time, pH, temperature and aeration rate)
within the following ranges: pH 4–8, temperature 20–
10. Romano, A.; Gandolfi, R.; Nitti, P.; Rollini, M.; Moli-
nari, F. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2002, 17, 235–240.
11. Molinari, F.; Villa, R.; Aragozzini, F.; Cabella, P.; Bar-
beni, M. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1997, 70, 294–298.