ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
Letter
2
2a
metabolic oxidation, we turned our attention to modeling
the phenyl ring of 6, it still is in a position to make a productive
edge-to-face pi-stacking interaction with Tyr126. Imidazopyr-
idine 36 possessed the best overall in vitro profile in terms of
potency and stability for this series and was selected for more
extensive profiling.
22b
substituent effects on the oxidation potentials of quinolines.
Reduction potentials of nitrogen-containing compounds have
been reported to correlate with the lowest unoccupied
23,24
molecular orbital (LUMO) energies.
Modeling calcula-
tions suggested that electron-withdrawing group(s) on the
quinoline ring could reduce N-oxidation potential. For
Further in vitro profiling (Table 4) showed the compound
had modest oxidative metabolic stability; however, this
metabolic stability profile was superior to both linrodostat
(4) (T1/2 human = 53, mouse = 4, rat = 20, dog = 17, cyno =
7) and BMS-986242 (5) (T1/2 human = 14, mouse = 4, rat =
10, dog = 10, cyno = 2). Compound 36 had good intrinsic
permeability in a PAMPA assay and Caco-2 cells (a-b = 113
nm/s; efflux ratio = 0.6). Unfortunately, compound 36 showed
modest PXR activation (PXR EC50 = 1.2 μM (30% Ymax)) and
CYP inhibition in several human isoforms including potent
inhibition of CYP 2C9.
Compound 36 was further examined in the SKOV3 human
ovarian carcinoma xenograft model (Table 5). In this model,
immune-compromised nu/nu nude mice were implanted with
SKOV3 cells, and the resulting tumors were allowed to grow
for 2 weeks. On day 14, tumor-bearing mice were dosed with
imidazopyridine 36 QD at 20 mg/kg for 5 days. On day 18 at
2, 6, and 24 h time points, tumor kynurenine concentration
(PD) and compound 36 concentration (PK) were measured in
the tumor. The reduction of kynurenine levels, when compared
to a vehicle control, was used as a pharmacodynamic marker.
Imidazopyridine 36 demonstrated a robust profile. At a 20 mg/
kg dose, it achieved 56% reduction in tumor kynurenine levels
and tumor exposure of 43.6 μM*h AUC. This profile compares
well with linrodostat (4): at a 60 mg/kg dose, 4 achieved a
61% reduction in kynurenine levels and a tumor AUC of 34.9
μM*h.
In summary, structurally differentiated IDO1 inhibitors were
identified. Heterocyclic amide isosteres and replacements were
investigated. Amino-oxadiazoles, such as compound 25,
demonstrated potent cellular and hWB potency but led to
PXR activation. Optimization of benzimidazole 14 led to the
identification of imidazopyridine 36. Lead compound 36
possessed potent cellular and hWB activity as well as improved
metabolic stability (T1/2). Additionally, it had a suitable
permeability profile. Based on these findings, compound 36
was advanced into an in vivo human SKOV3 xenograft tumor
model in mice. Compound 36 demonstrated a robust PK/PD
profile with improved exposure and comparable PD effects to
linrodostat (4). In contrast to linrodostat (4), which showed
less PXR activation (PXR EC50 > 50 μM (13% Ymax)) and a
cleaner rCYP panel profile, compound 36 demonstrated more
significant PXR activation and CYP inhibition across several
isoforms; therefore, compound 36 was not investigated further.
example, 6-CF quinoline displays higher predicted reduction
3
22,23
potential Ered = 2.12 than that of 6-F-quinoline Ered = 1.93.
Gratifyingly, the 6-CF -substituted quinoline 26 offered potent
3
cellular activity as well as improved metabolic stability but had
a 3−4-fold loss of hWB potency compared to analogue 25.
Analogue 27, with a 6,8-difluoro-quinoline moiety, unexpect-
edly showed less stability, especially in mouse LMs. Further
profiling revealed that all three cis-isomers (25−27) led to PXR
activation. As a consequence of this finding, efforts were
focused on improving PXR activity. We were pleased to find
that O-linked trans-isomer 28 did not activate PXR, but
unfortunately it showed not only a 10-fold disparity between
human and mouse IDO1 activity, which would hinder in vivo
studies, but also a significant drop in hWB potency. It is worth
noting that the trans-isomer of C-linked compound 25 (not
shown) also did not activate PXR; however, IDO1 inhibitory
activity was very poor. We then turned our attention to alpha-
substituent modification and found that α-MOM-substituted
analogue 29 and α-EOM-substituted analogue 30 both
demonstrated significant improvement in PXR activity
compared to compounds 25−27. While 29 and 30 maintained
good hIDO1 activity in cells, they had more modest hWB
potency (IC50 = 0.031 μM and 0.096 μM, respectively, vs
0
.002−0.042 μM for 4) and metabolic stability compared to
lead compound 4 (see Table 1). Since PXR activation could
not be remedied while maintaining suitable hWB and mouse
cellular activity, this series was not progressed.
We then focused on the benzimidazole series. Although
benzimidazole 14 displayed poor metabolic stability, it had
very potent cellular activity (see Table 1). Therefore,
identification of a more stable benzimidazole was of primary
interest. Addition of a chloro substituent on the phenyl ring of
the benzimidazole in combination with incorporation of a
nitrogen atom into the ring yielded imidazopyridine 32 (Table
3
), which exhibited a significant improvement in stability
compared to 31 (H/M/R = 67/22/17) while maintaining
hWB activity (IC50 = 0.039 μM). As was previously observed
in the amino-oxadiazole series, introduction of ethyl
substitution at the alpha-position generally increased potency
and improved metabolic stability. Analogue 33 displayed
potent hWB activity and improved stability, while imidazopyr-
idine 34 revealed unexpectedly poor mouse metabolic stability
(
H/M/R = 78/7/35). Consistent with trends observed in the
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
sı Supporting Information
amino-oxadiazole series (see 28, Table 2), incorporating an O-
linked trans-isomer (35) was found to increase metabolic
stability. Once again, however, mouse cellular activity suffered.
Combining the more potent alpha-ethyl group with the more
■
*
stable imidazopyridine and the 6-CF -quinoline (see 26, Table
3
Biological assay protocols, in vivo pharmacokinetic−
pharmacodynamic study protocols, experimental proce-
dures, and analytical data for all final compounds (PDF)
2
, vide supra) led to compound 36. Docking models of 36,
based on the X-ray cocrystal of compound 6 and hIDO1 in
Figure 2, indicated that the imidazopyridine likely maintains
the same key interactions observed for the amide (Figure 3).
The NH of the imidazopyridine nicely overlays with the NH of
the amide bond in 6 which would correctly position it to make
the key hydrogen bond with Ser167. While the pyridine
portion of the imidazopyridine is positioned a little lower than
Corresponding Authors
■
Liping Zhang − Bristol Myers Squibb Research and
Development, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-4000, United
4
99
ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 494−501