Organic Letters
Letter
Thus, the pH acts as an effective and simple stimulus to switch
contrast, the two other enantiomeric cages M-(S,S,S)-1 and
P-(R,R,R)-1 exhibited unprecedented enantioselectivity as C3-
symmetric receptors: with the primary ammonium norephe-
drine, an enantioselectivity value (KM‑(S,S,S)‑1/KP‑(R,R,R)‑1) of 445
was measured and with the secondary ammonium ephedrine
an exclusive enantioselectivity was observed with a binding
1
reversibly from a collapsed state to a reinflated cage.
Once the conformational issues of the deprotonated and
protonated cages 1 were solved, we examined the ability of the
four inflated C -symmetric receptors P-(S,S,S)-1, P-(R,R,R)-1,
3
M-(S,S,S)-1, and M-(R,R,R)-1 to complex chiral ammonium
neurotransmitters: (1R,2S)-(−)-ephedrine, (1R,2S)-(−)-nor-
−
1
constant close to 19 000 M for the M-(S,S,S)-1 host, while
no binding occurred with its enantiomer counterpart P-
(R,R,R)-1.
1
ephedrine, (1S,2S)-(+)-pseudoephedrine, and L-adrenaline. H
NMR titration experiments were performed, and the modeling
of the resulting titration curves gives rise to the binding
constants given in Table 1. In most of the cases, the best fit was
1
The H NMR titration curves shown in Figure 3 clearly
Table 1. Association Constants of the Enantiopure
Receptors 1 with Ammonium Guests in CDCl /CD OD 95/
3
3
5
at 298 K
Figure 3. Titration curves of hosts M-(S,S,S)-1 (blue) and P-(R,R,R)-
(orange) with (1R,2S)-(−)-ephedrine. The complexation-induced
) of the guest’s proton at 5.18 ppm
1
shifts (Δδ = δ
− δ
uncomplex
complex
were recorded and plotted as a function of the ratio [G]/[H] (dots).
Curves were fitted with the Bindfit program (solid lines).
enantiomers toward ephedrine. Changing only one stereogenic
center in the guest structure, i.e., switching from ephedrine to
pseudoephedrine, led to complete reverse of the enantiose-
lectivity: an enantioselectivity of 8.2 in favor of P-(R,R,R)-1 was
observed with pseudoephedrine as a guest. As a consequence,
the host P-(R,R,R)-1 exhibits a strong substrate selectivity
toward pseudoephedrine: a Kpseudoephedrine/Knorephedrine ratio of
2
63 is reached and the substrate selectivity is even exclusive
when pseudoephedrine is compared to ephedrine. Interest-
ingly, the lower enantioselectivity obtained with L-adrenaline as
substrate induced changes in substrate selectivities: the M-
(
S,S,S)-1 enantiomer preferentially binds norephedrine or
ephedrine than adrenaline (with Knorephedrine/Kadrenaline of 30,
and Kephedrine/Kadrenaline of 8, respectively), whereas the
enantiomer P-(R,R,R)-1 is adrenaline-selective with a selectiv-
ity Kadrenaline/Knorephedrine of 28 and even exclusive when
compared to ephedrine. Thus, switching from one enantiomer
to another completely changed the substrate selectivity,
allowing building selective receptors for a given neuro-
transmitter by simply using the mirror image of a cage.
As cage P-(R,R,R)-1 and obviously its enantiomer M-(S,S,S)-
a
b
Picrate was used as counterion. K values were determined by fitting
1
the H NMR titration curves of proton of the guest using Bindfit, the
error bars arise from the fitting.
K(other enantiomer)
18 c
Defined as K(one enantiomer)
/
17 d
.
No complexation was observed.
1
are able to switch from a globular form to a fully imploded
conformation upon an acidic stimulus (vide supra), we
wondered if this nanoscale molecular motion could occur
with a guest already encapsulated in the cavity, thereby
expelling the included guest outside the cavity. Addition of
picric acid to a solution of encapsulated ephedrine led
immediately to the imploded structure of the cage M-(S,S,S)-
1 associated with the release of the ephedrine guest in the
media (Figure 4). This result demonstrates that this molecular
motion of the cage is possible despite the high stability of the
achieved with a 1:1 host/guest stoichiometry, except for (i)
norephedrine guest and M-(S,S,S)-1 host and (ii) pseudoephe-
drine guest and M-(S,S,S)-1 and P-(R,R,R)-1 hosts where two
complexes were formed subsequently with a 1:1 and then a 1:2
host/guest ratio. The two enantiomeric hosts M-(R,R,R)-1 and
P-(S,S,S)-1 displayed good substrate selectivities with Kephedrine
/
Kadrenaline of 2.3 and 2.5 and with Knorephedrine/Kadrenaline of 34.8
17
and 33.5, respectively. However, when complexed with
tested guests, only low enantioselectivities were achieved, the
best result being obtained with pseudoephedrine, with a
modest enantioselectivity KP‑(S,S,S)‑1/KM‑(R,R,R)‑1 of 4.2. In
−
1
initial host−guest complex (K = 19 000 M ). After
subsequent addition of triethylamine, the host was reinflated
and able to encage the ephedrine guest simultaneously, giving
C
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX