´
S. Alvarez et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 43 (2008) 1898–1904
1899
double-layer capacitors operating with organic electrolytes. However, in spite of the practical interest in mesoporous
carbons with sizes in the nanometer range (<100 nm), only a few studies have focussed on this objective [7]. Typically,
the templated mesoporous carbons reported in the literature are made up of relatively large particles (>1 mm) [5,8,9].
Obviously, they have larger diffusion paths compared to nanosized carbons, a drawback which limits their
applicability in the areas just mentioned. Accordingly, the main purpose of this work is to present a synthetic route to
mesoporous carbons made up of nanometric particles (<100 nm). One way to obtain carbon materials with these
structural characteristics is the use of nanosized porous silica materials as templates. Silica materials made up of
nanosized particles have been previously reported; i.e., HMS silica [10], MSU-4 [11] or, more recently, MCM-41
bimodal porous silica [12]. Here, we selected as template MSU-1 type silica [13]. The synthetic strategy reported here
is an innovative method for preparing carbon materials with a very small particle size (<100 nm), which in addition
exhibit a mesostructured skeleton derived from the structural pores of the silica used as template. We expect carbon
materials combining these structural properties (i.e., nanosized particles and a well-developed mesoporous network)
to be very useful for the above-mentioned applications.
2
. Experimental
The synthetic scheme used to prepare the mesostructured silica materials is based on that reported by Bagshaw [13]
for the synthesis of MSU-1 silica. However, we have introduced here several modifications in this methodology related
to (a) the type of surfactant used, (b) the starting mole ratio surfactant/silica precursor and (c) the aging period. Thus,
the surfactants employed as structure directing agents are: Brij 58 (C EO , C H –(OCH CH ) –OH), Brij 76
1
6
20
16 33
2
2 20
(
C H –(OCH CH ) –OH). A single EO (OCH CH ) group contributes slightly more to hydrophilicity than a single
C EO , C H –(OCH CH ) –OH), Brij 78 (C EO , C H –(OCH CH ) –OH) and Brij 98 (C H EO ,
18 10 18 37 2 2 10 18 20 18 37 2 2 20 18 35 20
1
8
35
2
2 20
2
2
methylene contributes to hydrophobicity, so that the hydrophobic character of these surfactants decreases following
the sequence Brij 76 ꢀ Brij 78 ꢁ Brij 98 > Brij 58 [14]. The synthesis consisted on the addition of the silica source
(
TEOS = tetraethylortosilicate), under stirring, to an aqueous solution containing the surfactant that is maintained
under vigorous stirring (40 8C, 2 h). In a second step, dissolution of NaF 0.25 M is added and the mixture was
maintained under stirring (35 8C, 18 h). The resulting solid is washed with water, dried and calcined in air at 600 8C
(
2 8C/min, 4 h). The starting mole ratio was TEOS:Brij:NaF:H O = 1:0.070:0.05:207, except in the case of Brij 58
2
(
TEOS:Brij 58:NaF:H O = 1:0.076:0.05:75), due to its higher hydrophilic character.
The synthesis of the carbons was performed according to the procedure reported elsewhere [15]. Briefly, the
2
mesostructured silica was impregnated with p-toluene sulfonic acid (0.5 M in ethanol) for 1 h, filtered, washed with a
small volume of ethanol and dried at 80 8C. Afterwards, a volume of furfuryl alcohol equal to the silica structural pore
volume was added. The impregnated sample was cured in air (12 h, 80 8C) in order to polymerise the furfuryl alcohol
into polyfurfuryl alcohol, which was then carbonised under N at 800 8C (2 8C/min, 1 h). The resulting carbon–silica
2
composite was immersed in 48% HF (room temperature, 15 h) to remove the silica template. The carbon obtained was
washed and then dried in air at 120 8C.
Small angle X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra were obtained on a Siemens D5000 diffractometer operating at 40 kV
and using Cu Ka radiation (l = 0.15406 nm). Nitrogen adsorption isotherms were performed at À196 8C on a
Micromeritis ASAP 2010 gas analyser. The BET surface area was deduced from the isotherm analysis in the relative
pressure range of 0.04–0.20. The total pore volume was calculated for the amount adsorbed at a relative pressure of
0
adsorption branch [16]. The pore volume of the structural pores (V ), the textural pores (V ) and the external surface
.99. Pore size distributions (PSD) were calculated by applying the Kruk–Jaroniec–Sayari (KJS) method to the
str
tex
area (S ) were estimated using the a -plot method. Micrographs SEM and TEM were obtained by a Zeiss microscope
ext
s
(
DSM 942) and a JEOL microscope (JEM-2000 EX II) operating at 160 kV, respectively.
3
. Results and discussion
The morphology and the size of the silica particles prepared by means of sol–gel technique are controlled by the
nucleation and growing kinetics [17]. When the silica synthesis takes place at pH ꢁ 7, the hydrolyzed species from the
silica precursor get up a spontaneous condensation that will cause the mixing of the hydrolysis and condensation step
[18]. This implies a cluster–cluster growth that leads to nanometric silica particles. These particles are connected each
other, in order to be stabilized, which is evidenced by the structure with large aggregates as revealed by SEM