pounds are generally regarded as the most promising
candidates for blue OLEDs.
center. This radical coupling of fluorene and anthracene was
examined by using a variety of metals, such as Zn, Fe, Cu,
6
To date, the anthracene moiety, which exhibits a highly
efficient fluorescence property, with derivatives that are one
of the best blue host materials, is often directly introduced
to fluorene Via aryl-aryl coupling. However, the introduction
of anthracene into the C-9 position of fluorene, in which the
anthracene and fluorene moieties are connected through a
2 4 2 4
Sm, in different solvents (CS , CCl , Et O, DMSO, NH Cl/
MeOH) in order to improve the yields of the desired
compounds 1 and 2. It was found that the zinc-mediated
2
radical reaction in CS solvent provided a much better yield
8
than other reaction conditions. In order to increase the
electrochemical stabilities of 1-fold fluorene-functionalized
anthracene, the methylation of 1 was applied Via deproto-
nation at the active C-9 position by n-BuLi and followed by
an electrophilic substitution reaction with methyl idoide. The
C-9 methylated 1-fold substituted derivative 3 was expected
to exhibit stronger rigidity due to the existence of a steric
effect of the methyl group.
3
tetrahedral sp -hybridized carbon atom, has not been dis-
closed. The C-9 introduction of a bulky anthracene moiety
is expected not only to increase molecular rigidity but also
to effectively hinder close packing and intermolecular
interactions, so that the tendency for molecules to crystallize
should be reduced.
In this paper, we wish to report our design and preparation
of two kinds of new chromophores, which contain one or
two tetrahedral centers in 1-fold or 2-fold fluorene-func-
tionalized anthracene derivatives. The tetrahedral nature of
The lithium-bromine exchange of 9,10-dibromoan-
thracene with n-BuLi at low temperature (-78 °C), followed
by quenching with fluorenone derivatives, provided the
difluorenols in moderate yields. Further alkylations with
1-bromohexane yielded the 2-fold substituted chromophores
4 and 5, in which two tetrahedral centers were constructed
simultaneously.
A single crystal of compound 2 (CCDC 765306) was
cultivated from pentane and analyzed by X-ray crystal-
lography to establish the pattern of substitution and its
structure. As shown in Figure 1, the bulky fluorene moiety
3
the sp -hybridized carbon atom (at the C-9 position of the
fluorene moiety) connects the conjugated moieties of fluorene
and anthracene through a σ-bond, which in turn serves as a
conjugation interrupt. Thus, the desired electronic and optical
properties of the corresponding chromophores combining
both fluorene and anthracene’s architectural specificities are
7
expected to be preserved. The photophysical, electrochemi-
cal, and electroluminescent characteristics of these chro-
mophores in unoptimized OLED devices are also initially
evaluated.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of C-9 Fluorenyl Substituted Anthracenes
Figure 1. (a) Molecular view of X-ray structure of 2 (left). (b)
Top view from the structure (right).
is nearly perpendicular relative to the anthracene ring, while
two tert-butyl groups are at the 2,6-positions of anthracene.
This conformation effectively releases the steric interactions
between the anthracene and fluorene cores and prevents
interchromophore interactions. Thus, the introduction of the
tetrahedral sp -hybridized carbon atom center should break
the π-stacking and prevent the excimer formation which
As shown in Scheme 1, 9-bromofluorene was introduced
into the 9-position of anthracene directly under the promotion
3
2
of activated zinc powder in CS solvent, affording the 1-fold
causes the concentration quenching of fluorescence in a solid
fluorene-functionalized derivatives 1 and 2 with a tetrahedral
9
state.
UV-vis absorption, photoluminescence, thermal, and
electrochemical properties of these compounds are sum-
marized in Table 1. The absorption spectra of the 1- and
(
6) (a) Poriel, C.; Rault-Berthelot, J.; Barriere, F.; Slawin, A. M. Z. Org.
Lett. 2008, 10, 373–376. (b) Horhant, D.; Liang, J. J.; Virboul, M.; Poriel,
C.; Alcaraz, G.; Rault-Berthelot, J. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 257–260. (c) Wong,
K. T.; Liao, Y. L.; Lin, Y. T.; Su, H. C.; Wu, C. C. Org. Lett. 2005, 7,
5
131–5134. (d) Chao, T. C.; Lin, Y. T.; Yang, C. Y.; Hung, T. S.; Chou,
H. C.; Wu, C. C.; Wong, K. T. AdV. Mater. 2005, 17, 992–996. (e) Tao,
(8) (a) Estevam, I. H. S.; Bieber, L. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44,
667–670. (b) Lavilla, B.; Coll, O.; Bosch, J.; Orozco, M.; Luque, F. J. Eur.
J. Org. Chem. 2001, 3719–3729. (c) Li, C. J. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 2023–
2035.
S.; Peng, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wang, P.; Lee, C. S.; Lee, S. T. AdV. Funct. Mater.
2
005, 15, 1716–1721.
(
7) (a) Shen, W. J.; Dodda, R.; Wu, C. C.; Wu, F. I.; Liu, T. H.; Chen,
H. H.; Chen, C. H.; Shu, C. F. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 930–934. (b) Chiang,
C. L.; Shu, C. F. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 682–687. (c) Wu, F. I.; Dodda,
R.; Reddy, D. S.; Shu, C. F. J. Mater. Chem. 2002, 12, 2893–2897.
(9) (a) Wurthner, F.; Thalacker, C.; Diele, S.; Tschierske, C. Chem.sEur.
J. 2001, 7, 2245–2253. (b) Jenekhe, S. A.; Osaheni, J. A. Science 1994,
265, 765–768.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 17, 2010
3875