6
010
N. Chinko6 et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 6009–6010
OH
O
O
the double bond. We thus compared the reactions in
Et O and THF. In ether, a single isomer was formed
DMP
Bu
Silica gel
Bu
2
(
Scheme 2) whereas in THF the ratio of 2:3 was now
3:66. This result can be interpreted as a result of the
4a
3
1
a
•
weakening p-chelation favoring solvation of the metal
by a more electron donating solvent. Similarly, when an
aldehyde is added as the electrophile, the chelation
between the magnesium enolate and the carbonyl moi-
ety of the electrophile is stronger than the chelation
between the magnesium and the double bond. In this
case, the aldolization reaction occurs via a chair-like
transition state to give exclusively the homoallylic aldol
product 13 in good yield but in a modest diastereomeric
ratio. In conclusion, the reaction between the organo-
magnesium halide and the allenyl ketone has been
reinvestigated and was found to give only the a,b-
unsaturated ketone as single geometrical isomer.
Bu
O
MeMgBr
EtMgBr
5
Bu 82%
O
O
6
Bu 72%
7
iPrMgBr
1a
Bu 89%
O
O
tBuMgBr
8
Bu 95%
PhMgBr
9
Acknowledgements
Bu 60%
Ph
Scheme 2.
This research was supported by the Israel Science
Foundation administrated by the Israel Academy of
Sciences and Humanities (79/01-1) and by the Fund for
the Promotion of Research at the Technion.
In order to gain more insight into the mechanism, we
trapped the intermediate 10 at low temperature by the
addition of MeOD and iodine to give 11 and 12 as
single geometrical isomers (Scheme 3). This unique
stereoselectivity result is most probably due to the
p-chelation of the magnesium enolate with the terminal
References
8
double bond. In this case, a dipolar interaction
+
d
−d
2
1. Marek, I.; Normant, J. F. In Carbometalation Reactions in
Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions; Diederich, F.;
Stang, P. J., Eds.; Wiley-VCH, 1998; p. 271.
between Mg –O and the sp carbon is postulated and
leads to the cyclic intermediate 10. Then, by addition of
the electrophile, reaction occurs at the terminal position
leading to the expected products. In order to assess this
hypothesis, we considered that using a solvent that
coordinates to the magnesium atom more efficiently
than ether, would override the p-electron donation of
2
3
. Bertrand, M.; Le Gras, J. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1962, 2136.
. (a) Koosha, K.; Berlan, J.; Capmau, M.-L.; Chodkiewicz,
W. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1975, 1284; (b) Berlan, J.; Battioni,
J.-P.; Koosha, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 3355; (c)
Bertrand, M.; Gil, G.; Viala, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977,
1
785; (d) Berlan, J.; Koosha, K.; Battioni, J.-P. Bull. Soc.
O
Bu
O
Br
Chim. Fr. 1978, 575; (e) Berlan, J.; Battioni, J.-P.; Koosha,
K. J. Organomet. Chem. 1978, 152, 259.
. Crabbe, P.; Velarde, E. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1972, 241.
Mg
iPrMgBr
Bu
•
4
10
D
iPr
I2
O
5. (a) Marshall, J. A.; Wang, X. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57,
MeOD
3387; (b) Marshall, J. A.; Bartley, G. S. J. Org. Chem.
Bu
I
1
994, 59, 7169; (c) Marshall, J. A.; Sehon, C. A. J. Org.
11
O
87%
Chem. 1997, 62, 4313.
1
2
Bu
6. Hashmi, A. S. K.; Bats, J. W.; Choi, J.-H.; Schwarz, L.
74%
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7491.
7
8
. Kende, A. S.; Toder, B. H. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 163
and references cited therein.
Ph
OH
Bu
1
88%
d.r. 4:1
3
. (a) Kossa, W. C.; Rees, T. C.; Richey, H. G., Jr. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1971, 3455; (b) St Denis, J.; Dolzine, T.;
Oliver, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 8260; (c) Meyer,
C.; Marek, I.; Courtemanche, G.; Normant, J. F. Tetra-
hedron 1994, 50, 11665.
O
Scheme 3.