Zhang et al.
FULL PAPER
Ethyl 2-(5-(1,3-dioxo-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-iso-
indol-2(3H)-yl)-6-fluoro-2-oxobenzo[d]oxazol-3(2H)-
in triplicate. After 15 d, the crop safety was determined
by visually comparing the injury caused by the test
treatments relative to the untreated controls.
yl)propanoate (1h) White solid; yield 68%; m.p.
1
1
11.8-112.4 ℃; H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl
3
) δ: 7.17
Field trials
(
d, J=8.5 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 6.87 (d, J=6.1 Hz, 1H, Ar-H),
5
.04 (q, J=7.4 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.27-4.19 (m, 2H,
), 2.49-2.38 (m, 4H, 2×CH ), 1.89-1.78 (m,
H, CH CH ), 1.72 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 3H, CHCH ), 1.24 (t,
J=7.1 Hz, 3H, CH ); C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl ) δ:
68.81, 154.09 (d, JC-F=246.8 Hz), 153.60, 142.36 (d,
C-F=13.0 Hz), 142.35, 125.89, 115.12 (d, JC-F=15.5
Hz), 110.38, 100.21 (d, JC-F=27.3 Hz), 62.28, 51.75+,
1.16, 20.17, 14.81, 13.92; HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]
calcd for C20 : 403.1300; found 403.1304.
The field trials were carried out at Yangtze Univer-
sity, Jingzhou City (Hubei Province, South China). The
soil used in this study was a loam soil containing 1.48%
organic matter, and the pH of the soil was 7.4. The
maize variety Luoyu No. 8 was planted in the soil, and
the treated plots were arranged in a random block array
with four replicates. Compound 1h was formulated as a
10% emulsifiable concentrate, and the commercial her-
bicide 38% atrazine SC was used as a positive control.
The application rate for the post-emergence treatment
OCH
4
2
2
2
2
3
13
2
CH
3
3
1
J
2
H
2 6
20FN O
Greenhouse herbicidal activity
−1
was varied from 100 to 300 g AI•ha . The weed num-
The herbicidal activities of compounds 1a-1u and
a-2d were tested against monocotyledon weeds (i.e.,
bers were measured at regular intervals, and the final
fresh weights of the aerial portions of the weeds were
also measured. The percentage of inhibition relative to
the water-sprayed control group was calculated. The
control effects expressed as percentages were arcsine
transformed to homogenize any variance prior to analy-
sis, and those of the different spraying treatments were
examined using Duncan’s multiple range test.
2
Echinochloa crus-galli and Digitaria sanguinalis) and
broadleaf weeds (i.e., Abutilon theophrasti and Ama-
ranthus retroflexus) using a previously published pro-
[20]
cedure.
Acifluorfen was used as a positive control.
All of the test compounds were dissolved in 100 μL of
N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) containing a couple of
drops of Tween 20, and the resulting solutions were
sprayed onto pot-grown plants. The rate of application
Results and Discussion
−1
(g AI•ha ) was calculated according to the total amount
of active ingredient in the formulation divided by the
surface area of the pot. Plastic pots with a diameter of 6
cm were filled with soil to a depth of 8 cm. Approxi-
mately 15 seeds of selected weeds were sown in the soil
at the depth of 1-3 cm and grown at 20-30 ℃ in a
greenhouse. The formulation solutions were applied for
pre-emergence treatment 24 h after the seeds had been
sown. For post-emergence treatment, the broadleaf
weeds were treated at the two-leaf stage, whereas the
monocotyledon weeds were treated at the one-leaf stage.
The pre- and post-emergence application rate was set at
Synthesis
As shown in Scheme 1, the target compounds 1a-
1
u were prepared via a five-step linear sequence starting
from either 2-amino-5-fluorophenol (3a) or 2-amino-5-
chlorophenol (3b). By performing the cyclization reac-
tion with BTC, compounds 3a and 3b were converted to
the corresponding 6-substituted-benzo[d]oxazol-2(3H)-
ones 4a and 4b, respectively. Subsequent nitration and
reduction reactions gave the corresponding 5-amino-6-
substituted benzo[d]oxazol-2(3H)-one intermediates 6a
and 6b, which were reacted with 4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-
isobenzofuran-1,3-dione to afford the 2-(2-oxo-2,3-di-
hydrobenzo[d]oxazol-5-yl)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-iso-
indole-1,3(2H)-dione intermediates 10a and 10b in
moderate yields. Finally, intermediates 10a and 10b
were reacted with various alkylating agents to give the
target compounds 1a-1u in yields of 56%-80%. In-
termediate 11 was prepared from 2-amino-4-chloro-5-
nitrophenol. Compounds 2a-2d were prepared from
intermediate 11 in yields of 55%-76% according to the
alkylation procedure used for the preparation of com-
pounds 1a-1u.
−1
3
75 g AI•ha . A mixture containing the same amount
of water, DMF and Tween 20 was sprayed as the sol-
vent control. Each treatment was conducted in triplicate.
The fresh weights of the aerial parts of the plant were
measured 10 d after treatment, and the percentage inhi-
bition value was used to describe the control efficiency
of the compounds.
ED50 values of some compounds against Echinoch-
loa crus-galli and Abutilon theophrasti were calculated
with SPSS 17.0 software.
Crop selectivity
Halogenated alkylation reagents generally prefer to
react with nitrogen atoms through N-alkylation reaction
in the target compounds preparation. However, these
Conventional crops of rice, soybean, cotton, wheat
and maize were planted separately in plastic pots (di-
ameter 9 cm) filled with soil and grown in a greenhouse
at 20-25 ℃. After the plants had reached the 4-leaf
[21]
reagents can also react through O-alkylation reactions.
To further confirm the structures of the target com-
stage, the test compounds were applied at a dosage of
3
pounds, The crystal structure of 1h is shown in Figure
2, which unambiguously demonstrates that the target
00 or 150 g AI•ha− for the post-emergence evaluation
1
[22]
of the test compounds. Each experiment was conducted
compounds were N-alkylation products.
4
www.cjc.wiley-vch.de
© 2015 SIOC, CAS, Shanghai, & WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chin. J. Chem. 2015, XX, 1—7