M. Stratakis et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 5433–5436
5435
tent with cation binding to the ester or hydroxy func-
tionality, which directs 1O2 attack towards the more
substituted side of the double bond, as proposed in TS1
of Scheme 2 to form the tertiary allylic hydroperoxide.
The moderate selectivity in the case of 6 (59%), might be
attributed to a less efficient cation–1O2 interaction
within NaY, since the binding site of Naþ to a-terpineol
is different compared to 4 or 5.
δ−
O
δ+
O
H3C
AcO
H3C
OOH
CH3
AcO
H3C
H
CH3
3
4d
H3C
H
TS1
δ−
O
δ+
CH3
In conclusion, we have shown that remote polar sub-
stituents with respect to the reacting double bond can
substantially affect the product selectivity in the int-
razeolite photooxygenation of p-menth-1-ene type
compounds. In addition, we have presented the first
examples of the predominant formation of tertiary
allylic hydroperoxides in the photooxygenation of tri-
substituted alkenes by zeolite confinement.
O
H3C
HO
H
H3C
H3C
OOH
3a
O
O
TS2
H
H
δ−
O
H3C
H3C
δ+
O
CH3
OOH
H
HO
CH3
H3C
H3C
3
3d
TS3
Acknowledgements
Scheme 2. Naþ-directing regioselectivity and diastereoselection in the
intrazeolite photooxygenation of a-terpinyl acetate and terpinen-4-ol.
This work was supported by the Greek Secretariat of
Research and Technology. We thank Professor G. E.
Froudakis and Mr. A. Mavrandonakis for performing
the DFTcalculations.
(TS1 in Scheme 2), where it abstracts the axially oriented
allylic hydrogen atom at C-3. For terpinen-4-ol (3), we
propose that binding of the Naþ to the hydroxy func-
tionality places the cation on the one diastereotopic face
of the double bond, thus shielding oxygen attack from
References and notes
1
that face (Scheme 2). Therefore, O2 attacks from the
1. (a) Ramamurthy, V.; Lakshminarasimhan, P.; Grey, C. P.;
Johnston, L. J. Chem. Commun. 1998, 2411–2418; (b)
Pace, A.; Clennan, E. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
11236–11237; (c) Stratakis, M. Curr. Org. Synth. 2004, 1,
in press.
opposite face, mainly oriented towards the less substi-
tuted side of the alkene (TS2), to give the allylic
hydroperoxide 3a in 67% relative yield. A similar dia-
stereoselectivity trend has been reported by us, in the
intrazeolite photooxygenation of (R)-())-a-phelland-
rene.13 This ‘cation-shielding’ assumption for the int-
razeolite photooxygenation of 3 is supported by the fact
that the tertiary hydroperoxide 3d (TS3, Scheme 2) is
formed predominantly over its diastereomer 3c. By
contrast, the predominant formation of 3c over 3d in
2. Robbins, R. J.; Ramamurthy, V. Chem. Commun. 1997,
1071–1072.
3. (a) Clennan, E. L.; Sram, J. P. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 6945–
6950; (b) Stratakis, M.; Nencka, R.; Rabalakos, C.;
Adam, W.; Krebs, O. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 8758–8763.
4. Stratakis, M.; Rabalakos, C.; Mpourmpakis, G.; Frouda-
kis, G. E. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 2839–2843.
5. Stratakis, M.; Kalaitzakis, D.; Stavroulakis, D.; Kosmas,
G.; Tsangarakis, C. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3471–3474.
6. Shailaja, J.; Sivaguru, J.; Robbins, J.; Ramamurthy, V.;
Sunoj, R. B.; Chandrasekhar, J. Tetrahedron 2000, 56,
6927–6943.
1
solution could be attributed to a O2–hydroxyl steering
effect.14
Photooxygenation of substrates 5 and 6 (a-terpineol)15
supported the intrazeolite regioselectivity results for the
case of 4 (Scheme 3). While in solution, the typical
regiochemical outcome was found as in the case of 1–4,
by zeolite confinement the tertiary allylic hydroperox-
ides were formed in 77% and 59% relative yield,
respectively. This regioselectivity trend is again consis-
7. Li, X.; Ramamurthy, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
10666–10667.
8. Gollnick, K.; Schade, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 11, 857–
860.
9. Selected NMR data for the main allylic hydroperoxides in
1
CDCl3. Compound 3a H NMR: 4.95 (br s, 1H), 4.87 (br
s, 1H), 4.76 (dd, 1H, J1 ¼ 11:5 Hz, J2 ¼ 4:0 Hz), 2.45 (dt,
1H, J1 ¼ 13:0 Hz, J2 ¼ 4:0 Hz), 2.27 (td, 1H, J1 ¼ 13:0 Hz,
J2 ¼ 4:0 Hz), 2.13 (ddd, 1H, J1 ¼ 10 Hz, J2 ¼ 5:0 Hz,
J3 ¼ 2:5 Hz), 1.65 (m, 2H), 1.48 (m, 2H), 0.94 (d, 3H,
J ¼ 7:0 Hz), 0.93 (d, 3H, J ¼ 7:0 Hz). 13C NMR: 146.92,
105.13, 82.82, 75.56, 39.57, 38.28, 35.11, 29.57, 16.78,
16.76. Compound 3b 1H NMR: 5.07 (br s, 1H), 5.04 (br s,
1H), 4.60 (br t, 1H, J ¼ 3:5 Hz), 2.61 (m, 1H), 2.20 (m,
2H), 1.46–1.85 (m, 4H), 0.93 (d, 3H, J ¼ 7:0 Hz), 0.92 (d,
3H, J ¼ 7:0 Hz). 13C NMR: 144.96, 114.59, 86.18, 72.84,
10 (<1)
CH3 54 (41)
12 (7)
CH3
H3C
HO
H3C
H3C
MeO
46 (16)
36 (59)
42 (77)
O
6
5
Scheme 3. Regioselectivity in the photooxygenation of 5 and 6 (the
values in parentheses indicate the relative reactivity for allylic hydro-
gen atom abstraction within NaY).
1
37.83, 37.34, 35.32, 25.85, 16.92, 16.79. Compound 3c H
NMR: 5.82 (d, 1H, J ¼ 10:0 Hz), 5.67 (d, 1H,