www.eurjic.org
FULL PAPER
0
.078 mmol) under N
tion was then added to LiHMDS (14 mg, 0.082 mmol) in Et
1 mL) and stirred overnight. The solvent was then removed under
reduced pressure and the solid redissolved in CH Cl and the solu-
tion filtered through a glass wool/Celite plug to remove insoluble
LiClO . The CH Cl solution was concentrated under reduced
pressure and then layered with hexanes to yield a pale-yellow pre-
cipitate. The precipitate was collected, triturated with Et O, and
then dried under vacuum for 48 h (36 mg, 54%). FTIR (KBr): ν˜ =
749 (νCO), 1609 (νCO), 1451, 1355, 1094 (νClO4), 765, 623
2
until it was completely dissolved. This solu-
NaOCH
3
(0.05 mmol) in MeOH (1.0 mL) was injected into the
2
O
round-bottomed flask by using a gas-tight syringe and the resulting
solution stirred for 12 h. The head-space gas (10 mL) was removed
by means of a gas-tight syringe and analyzed by GC-TCD. The
yield of CO generated in the reaction was determined from a cali-
(
2
2
4
2
2
bration curve generated by using gas mixtures of O
2
and CO.
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
2
1
13
cle): H and C NMR and mass spectra; schematic description of
a possible reaction pathway for benzoylglyoxal.
1
ClO4) cm . UV/Vis (MeOH): λmax (ε) = 350 (6100 m–1 cm ).
–1
–1
(ν
C
41
H
35ClN NiO ·0.5CH Cl
4
8
2
2
: calcd. C 58.74, H 4.28, N 6.61; found Acknowledgments
+
35 4 4
C 59.17, H 4.67, N 7.09. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for [C41H N NiO ]
+
705.2012 [M – ClO
4
] ; found 705.2010.
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation
NSF) (grant numbers CHE-0848858 and CHE-1301092 to
(
Treatment of 5 with NaOCH
3
: For UV/Vis experiments, an approxi-
L. M. B.). C. A. and L. M. B. thank Jay Riley Argue and Sushma
Saraf for technical assistance.
mate 0.2 mm MeOH stock solution of 5 was prepared. A 2.4 mL
aliquot of this solution (ca. 0.48 μmol) was placed in a quartz UV/
Vis cell and then combined with a 200 μL aliquot of a 12 mm solu-
tion of NaOCH
μmol) was dissolved in CD
15 μmol) also dissolved in CD OD (0.25 mL). The two solutions
were then combined.
3
(2.4 μmol). For NMR experiments, 5 (ca. 2.5 mg,
3
(
3
OD (0.75 mL) and NaOCH
3
[
[
1] a) J. D. Finkelstein, J. Nutr. Biochem. 1990, 1, 228–237; b) C. C.
Valley, A. Cembran, J. D. Perlmutter, A. K. Lewis, N. P. Lab-
ello, J. Gao, J. N. Sachs, J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 34979–34991;
c) P. Cavuoto, M. F. Fenech, Cancer Treat. Rev. 2012, 38, 726–
3
Treatment of 5 with LiHMDS: An approximate 0.2 mm CH
stock solution of 5 was prepared. A 2.4 mL aliquot of this solution
ca. 0.48 μmol) was placed in a quartz UV/Vis cell. This solution
3
CN
736; d) T. Nakamoto, Gene 2009, 432, 1–6.
2] M. A. Pajares, G. D. Markham, in: Advances in Enzymology
and Related Areas of Molecular Biology (Ed.: E. J. Toone),
Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2011, vol. 78, p. 449–521.
(
was then combined with a 200 μL aliquot of a 12 mm Et
of LiHMDS (2.4 μmol).
2
O solution
[3] M. H. Stipanuk, Ann. Rev. Nutr. 1986, 6, 179–209.
[
[
4] W. A. M. Loenen, Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2006, 34, 330–333.
5] a) H. L. Schubert, R. M. Blumenthal, X. Cheng, Trends Bio-
chem. Sci. 2003, 28, 329–335; b) A.-W. Struck, M. L. Thomp-
son, L. S. Wong, J. Micklefield, ChemBioChem 2012, 13, 2642–
2655.
O
2
Reactivity: Solutions for monitoring by UV/Vis or 1H NMR
were prepared as described above. Oxygen was introduced by purg-
ing the solutions with dry O gas for 30 s, and then the reaction
vessels were sealed. In an alternative set of experiments, solutions
of 5 were purged with O and then subsequently treated with
equiv. of NaOCH
2
2
[6] a) P. A. Frey, A. D. Hegeman, F. J. Ruzicka, Crit. Rev. Biochem.
Mol. Biol. 2008, 43, 63–88; b) K. A. Shisler, J. B. Broderick,
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2012, 22, 701–710.
5
3
.
Identification of Organic Products: To analyze the products of the
reaction, a MeOH solution containing 5 (2 mg/mL, ca. 2.5 mm)
was prepared. The solution was then purged with O for 30 s. The
aerated solution was then combined with solid NaOCH (0.6 mg
per mL of solution) to give a NaOCH concentration of ca.
2.5 mm (5 equiv.). The solution was then repurged with O for
0 s, sealed with a rubber septum, and stirred for 12 h. The solvent
[7] M. Sauter, B. Moffatt, M. C. Saechao, R. Hell, M. Wirtz, Bio-
O
2
chem. J. 2013, 451, 145–154.
2
[8] a) M. E. Martinez, T. G. O’Brien, K. E. Fultz, N. Babbar, H.
Yerushalmi, N. Qu, Y. Guo, D. Boorman, J. Einspahr, D. S.
Alberts, E. W. Gerner, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100,
3
3
7
859–7864; b) R. M. Pascale, M. M. Simile, M. R. De Miglio,
1
3
2
F. Feo, Alcohol 2002, 27, 193–198.
[
9] a) E. Albers, IUBMB Life 2009, 61, 1132–1142; b) A. Sekow-
ska, V. Dénervaud, H. Ashida, K. Michoud, D. Haas, A. Yok-
ota, A. Danchin, BMC Microbiol. 2004, 4, 9; c) M. A. Avila,
E. R. Gar c´ ia-Trevijano, S. C. Lu, F. J. Corrales, J. M. Mato,
Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2004, 36, 2125–2130.
10] T. C. Pochapsky, T. Ju, M. Dang, R. Beaulieu, G. M. Pagani,
B. OuYang, in: Metal Ions in Life Sciences (Eds.: A. Sigel, H.
Sigel, R. K. O. Sigel), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2007,
vol. 2, p. 473–500.
was then removed under reduced pressure and the products ana-
lyzed as described below.
Detection of Formate: The crude reaction mixture was redissolved
in a mixture of CH CN (10 mL) and benzene (10 mL). 4Ј-Phenyl-
3
phenacyl bromide (10 equiv.) and 18-crown-6 (5 equiv.) were then
added to the reaction mixture. The resulting slurry was heated at
reflux under nitrogen for 18 h. The solvent was then removed under
[
2 2 2 2
reduced pressure and the solid extracted with CH Cl . The CH Cl
[
[
11] M. J. Maroney, S. Ciurli, Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 4206–4228.
12] C. J. Allpress, L. M. Berreau, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2013, 257,
3005–3029.
solution was then passed through a short plug of silica and ana-
lyzed by GC–MS. 4Ј-Phenylphenacyl formate was detected in the
reaction mixture.
[13] J. W. Wray, R. H. Abeles, J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 3147–3153.
[
14] J. W. Wray, R. H. Abeles, J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 21466–
1469.
15] Y. Day, P. C. Wensink, R. H. Abeles, J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274,
193–1195.
Detection of Benzoic Acid: The crude reaction mixture was redis-
solved in a small amount of CH CN and passed through a short
3
silica column, eluting with ethyl acetate. The organic products were
then analyzed by GC–MS and benzoic acid was identified by com-
parison of the molecular ion, fragmentation pattern, and retention
time with those of an authentic sample.
2
[
1
[16] R. Motterlini, L. E. Otterbein, Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2010,
9, 728–743.
[17] T. C. Pochapsky, S. S. Pochapsky, T. Ju, H. Mo, F. Al-Mjeni,
M. J. Maroney, Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002, 9, 966–972.
Analysis of Gaseous Products: Complex 5 (0.01 mmol) was dis-
solved in MeOH (1.0 mL) and the solution placed in a 50 mL
round-bottomed flask equipped with a stirring bar. The flask was
[
18] a) T. Ju, R. B. Goldsmith, S. C. Chai, M. J. Maroney, S. S. Po-
chapsky, T. C. Pochapsky, J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 363, 823–834; b)
T. C. Pochapsky, S. S. Pochapsky, T. Ju, C. Hoefler, J. Liang, J.
Biomol. NMR Spectroscopy 2005, 34, 117–127; c) S. S. Pochap-
purged with O
2
and sealed with a rubber septum. A solution of
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 4642–4649
4648
© 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim