organic compounds
Table 5
A comparison of geometrical parameters (A, ) of substituted isoindolinone compounds.
Ê
ꢀ
No rules?
Dihedral angles
Molecular
con®guration
Torsion angles
C(R2)
2
^
^
^
R1
R2
N
C
C
C
O
Csp
N
A B
A R1
A R2
Reference
CH
H
2
C
6
H
5
3
C
C
6
H
H
5
4
Z
Z
Z
E
Z
Z
� 3.1 (2)
0.6 (3)
� 2.7 (8)
177.9 (4)
5.4 (5)
1.222 (1) 1.384 (2)±1.412 (2) 0.67 (4)
1.225 (2) 1.358 (2)±1.400 (2) 0.79 (6)
1.221 (4) 1.387 (4)±1.417 (4) 0.86 (14)
1.212 (4) 1.388 (5)±1.402 (5) 2.81 (12)
1.216 (4) 1.395 (4)±1.421 (3) 1.66 (11)
1.211 (3) 1.400 (3)±1.417 (3) 2.26 (7)
98.21 (4)
±
78.94 (14)
111.11 (4)
11.91 (6)
±
45.68 (12) (3)
55.72 (10) (4)
(1)
(2)
(2)
6
OCH
3
C
CH
6
H
4
CH
C(OH)(CH
CO(C
C
C
3
)
2
3
6
H
5
)
C
C
6
H
H
5
4
6
H
H
5
5
62.7 (11)
112.90 (7)
6
OCH
3
6
3.3 (4)
55.05 (7)
(4)
²
References: (1) Khan et al. (1998); (2) Kundu et al. (1999); (3) Guha et al. (1999); (4) this work.
re®nement: MSC/AFC Diffractometer Control Software; data reduc-
tion: TEXSAN (Molecular Structure Corporation, 1995); program(s)
used to solve structure: MULTAN88 (Debaerdemaeker et al., 1988);
program(s) used to re®ne structure: SHELXL93 (Sheldrick, 1993);
molecular graphics: ZORTEP (Zsolnai, 1995); software used to
prepare material for publication: SHELXL93 and PARST (Nardelli,
1995).
Data collection
ꢀ
ꢁmax = 79.70
Rigaku AFC-5R diffractometer
!
±2ꢁ scans
Absorption correction: empirical
North et al., 1968)
min = 0.815, Tmax = 0.856
h = 0 ! 11
k = 0 ! 23
l = 0 ! 10
(
T
3 standard re¯ections
every 100 re¯ections
intensity decay: <2%
1
1
1
589 measured re¯ections
589 independent re¯ections
403 re¯ections with I > 2ꢃ(I)
Financial support from the Council of Scienti®c and Industrial
Research [grant No. 01 (1385)/95/EMR±II to NGK], New Delhi, is
gratefully acknowledged.
Re®nement
2
Re®nement on F
2
H-atom parameters constrained
2
2
2
2
R[F > 2ꢃ(F )] = 0.0436
wR(F ) = 0.1058
S = 1.116
w = 1/[ꢃ (F
o
) + (0.0652P) ]
2 2
2
o c
where P = (F + 2F )/3
(Á/ꢃ)max = � 0.005
Supplementary data for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic
archives (Reference: FR1206). Services for accessing these data are
described at the back of the journal.
Ê
� 3
1
2
589 re¯ections
08 parameters
Áꢄmax = 0.16 e A
Áꢄmin = � 0.23 e AÊ
� 3
Compound (III)
References
Crystal data
Barrett, D. M. Y., Kahwa, I. A. & Williams, D. J. (1996). Acta Cryst. C52, 2069±
2071.
�
3
C
22
H17NO
2
D
x
= 1.330 Mg m
M
r
= 327.37
Cu Kꢀ radiation
Brady, F., Gallagher, J. F. & Kenny, P. T. M. (1998). Acta Cryst. C54,
1523±1525.
Debaerdemaeker, T., Germain, G., Main, P., Refaat, L. S., Tate, C. &
Monoclinic, P2 =n
Ê
a = 8.577 (6) A
b = 10.542 (4) A
Ê
c = 18.272 (4) A
ꢅ = 98.34 (4)
V = 1634.7 (13) A
Z = 4
Cell parameters from 25
re¯ections
1
Ê
ꢀ
ꢁ = 28.8±39.9
Woolfson, M. M. W. (1988). MULTAN88. A System of Com-
� 1
ꢂ = 0.678 mm
T = 293 (2) K
puter Programs for the Automatic Solution of Crystal Structures
from X-ray Diffraction Data. Universities of York, England, and Louvain,
Belgium.
Feeder, N. & Jones, W. (1996). Acta Cryst. C52, 913±919.
Guha, S., Mukherjee, A. K., Khan, M. W. & Kundu, N. G. (1999). Acta Cryst.
C55, 818±819.
ꢀ
Ê
3
Prism, colourless
0.35 Â 0.25 Â 0.10 mm
Data collection
ꢀ
Khan, M. W., Guha, S., Mukherjee, A. K. & Kundu, N. G. (1998). Acta Cryst.
C54, 119±120.
Kundu, N. G., Khan, M. W., Guha, S. & Mukherjee, A. K. (1999). Acta Cryst.
C55, 239±241.
Linden, M., Hadler, D. & Hofman, S. (1997). Human Psychopharmacol. 12,
Rigaku AFC-5R diffractometer
ꢁmax = 78.92
!±2ꢁ scans
h = 0 ! 10
Absorption correction: empirical
North et al., 1968
k = 0 ! 13
l = � 22 ! 22
Tmin = 0.878, Tmax = 0.934
3 standard re¯ections
every 100 re¯ections
intensity decay: <2%
4
45±452.
McNab, H., Parsons, S. & Shannon, D. A. (1997). Acta Cryst. C53,
098±1099.
2
2
2
810 measured re¯ections
810 independent re¯ections
220 re¯ections with I > 2ꢃ(I)
1
Molecular Structure Corporation (1993). MSC/AFC Diffractometer Control
Software. MSC, 3200 Research Forest Drive, The Woodlands, TX 77381,
USA.
Molecular Structure Corporation (1995). TEXSAN. Single Crystal Structure
Analysis Software. Version 1.7±1. MSC, 3200 Research Forest Drive, The
Woodlands, TX 77381, USA.
Re®nement
2
Re®nement on F
2
H-atom parameters constrained
2
2
2
2
) + (0.0252P) +
R[F > 2ꢃ(F )] = 0.0483
wR(F ) = 0.1029
S = 1.095
w = 1/[ꢃ (F
o
2
2
2
c
0.5728P] where P = (F
(Á/ꢃ)max = � 0.004
o
+ 2F
)/3
Ê
� 3
Áꢄmax = 0.15 e A
Nardelli, M. (1995). J. Appl. Cryst. 28, 659.
North, A. C. T., Phillips, D. C. & Mathews, F. S. (1968). Acta Cryst. A24, 351±
2
2
810 re¯ections
26 parameters
Áꢄmin = � 0.15 e AÊ
� 3
359.
Sheldrick, G. M. (1993). SHELXL93. Program for the Re®nement of Crystal
Structures. University of G oÈ ttingen, Germany.
All H-atoms were generated using HFIX in SHELX93 (Sheldrick,
993). Uiso for H atoms were assigned as 1.2 times Ueq of the parent
non-H atoms before anisotropic re®nement.
Taylor, E. C., Zhou, P., Jenning, L. D., Mao, Z., Hu, B. & Jun, J.-G. (1997).
Tetrahedron Lett. 38, 521±524.
Zhuang, Z. P., Kung, M.-P., Mu, M. & Kung, H.-F. (1998). J. Med. Chem. 41,
1
157±162.
For both compounds, data collection: MSC/AFC Diffractometer
Control Software (Molecular Structure Corporation, 1993); cell
Zsolnai, L. (1995). ZORTEP. An Interactive ORTEP Program. University of
Heidelberg, Germany.
Acta Cryst. (2000). C56, 85±87
Alok K. Mukherjee et al. ꢁ
C
22
H
17NO
2
and C21
H15NO 87