CBCA synthase from C. sativa
1529
apatite equilibrated with buer A. After washing
with 3 column vols of the same buer, bound pro-
teins were eluted with a 200 ml linear gradient of
NaCl (0±1.5 M) at a ¯ow rate of 1 ml/min. The
most active fractions (fractions 14±16, each 8 ml)
were pooled, concd and dialysed overnight against
two changes of buer A. The purity of CBCA
synthase was con®rmed by SDS-PAGE analysis of
the dialysate.
Protein assay. Protein concentrations were
measured according to ref. [18] using bovine serum
albumin as the standard.
REFERENCES
1. Gaoni, R. and Mechoulam, R., Journal of the
American Chemical Society, 1964, 86, 1946.
2. ElSohly, H. N., Turner, C. E., Clark, A. M.
and ElSohly, M. A., Journal of Pharmaceutical
Sciences, 1982, 71, 1319.
Analysis of proteins by SDS-PAGE and isoelectric
focusing. SDS-PAGE was carried out with the sys-
tem of ref. [16] in a 12.5% acrylamide gel of
0.75 mm thickness. Samples were dialysed against
H2O, lyophilized, resuspended in SDS sample buer
and denatured in a steam bath (958) for 2 min
before loading. Gels were run at a constant current
of 30 mA for about 2 hr. Proteins were visualized
by Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 and silver stain-
ing. The subunit molecular mass of the enzyme was
determined by comparison with high molecular
mass protein standards. Isoelectric focusing was
conducted according to ref. [17] using 7.5 mm glass
tubes. The ampholyte gradient ranged from pH 4.0
to pH 7.0. After electrophoresis at 750 V for 2 hr,
proteins were visualized by Coomassie Brilliant
Blue R-250 staining. The pI of the puri®ed enzyme
was determined by comparison with marker
proteins.
3. Davis, M. W. and Hatoum, N. S., General
Pharmacology, 1983, 14, 247.
4. Morimoto, S., Komatsu, K., Taura, F. and
Shoyama, Y., Journal of Natural Products,
1997, 60, 854.
5. Taura, F., Morimoto, S. and Shoyama, Y.,
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1996, 271,
17411.
6. Taura, F., Morimoto, S., Shoyama, Y. and
Mechoulam, R., Journal of the American
Chemical Society, 1995, 117, 9766.
7. Imai, Y. and Sato, R., European Journal of
Biochemistry, 1967, 1, 419.
8. Crombie, L., Rossiter, J. T., Bruggen Van, N.
and Whiting, D. A., Phytochemistry, 1992, 31,
451.
9. Mechoulam, R., Science, 1970, 168, 1159.
10. Bhandari, P., Crombie, L., Harper, M. F.,
Rossiter, J. T., Sanders, M. and Whiting, D. A.,
Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin
Transactions I, 1992, 0, 1685.
Determination of native molecular mass. The
native molecular mass of CBCA synthase was deter-
mined by gel ®ltration chromatography on
a
11. Croteau, R., Chemical Reviews, 1987, 87, 929.
12. Cane, D. E. and Pargellis, C., Archives of
Biochemistry and Biophysics, 1987, 254, 421.
13. Hohn, T. M. and Plattner, R. D., Archives of
Biochemistry and Biophysics, 1989, 272, 137.
14. Alonso, W. R. and Croteau, R., Archives of
Biochemistry and Biophysics, 1991, 286, 511.
15. Rajaonarivony, J. I. M., Gershenzon, J. and
Croteau, R., Archives of Biochemistry and
Biophysics, 1992, 296, 49.
16. Laemmli, U. K., Nature, 1970, 224, 680.
17. O'Farrell, P. H., Journal of Biological
Chemistry, 1975, 250, 4007.
18. Bradford, M. M., Analytical Biochemistry,
1976, 72, 248.
1.5 Â75 cm column of Sephacryl S-200 HR equili-
brated with buer A at a ¯ow rate of 0.3 ml/min.
Fractions of 15 ml were collected. Molecular mass
markers from 29 to 700 kDa were resolved under
the same conditions prior to running the fraction
containing CBCA synthase activity.
Substrate speci®city and kinetic parameters.
CBGA and CBNRA were tested as potential sub-
strates of CBCA synthase using the standard assay,
unless otherwise stated. The Km and Vmax values
for both substrates were determined by Lineweaver-
Burk double-reciprocal plots of the velocity curves
of the CBCA-producing reaction with an increasing
concn of substrates.