Coinage Metal Dihydroxide Molecules
alkali hydroxide and cupric ion solution, but warming
dehydrates this compound to the oxide. However, Cu(OH)2
is soluble in concentrated strong base to give deep blue
anions [such as Cu(OH)42-], but there is no evidence for
pure solid Ag(OH)2.1 In this paper, we report the preparation
of copper, silver, and gold dihydroxide molecules through
the reaction of excited metal atoms with hydrogen peroxide
molecules and with mixtures of O2 and H2. Similar reactions
with H2 have formed coinage metal hydrides, where mono-
hydride species dominate the product yield,3,9 but in contrast,
the metal dihydroxide is the major hydroxide molecule
formed here. This is particularly noteworthy as the +2
oxidation state is less common for silver and gold. A
preliminary communication on the Au(OH)2 molecule has
been published.19
Figure 1. Infrared spectra for the copper and hydrogen peroxide reaction
products in solid argon at 10 K. (a) Cu + H2O2 deposited for 60 min, (b)
after 240-380 nm irradiation, and (c) after λ > 220 nm irradiation; (d) Cu
+ D2O2 deposited for 60 min, (e) after 240-380 nm irradiation, and (f)
after λ > 220 nm irradiation.
Experimental and Theoretical Methods
Experimentally, laser-ablated Cu, Ag, and Au atoms were reacted
with H2O2 molecules in an argon stream during condensation onto
a 10 K infrared transparent window, as described previously.3,20
Urea-hydrogen peroxide (Aldrich) at room temperature in the
sidearm of a Chemglass Pyrex-Teflon valve provided H2O2
molecules to the flowing argon reaction medium (4 mmol in 60
min). A deuterium-enriched urea-D2O2 complex was prepared by
adapting earlier procedures to exchange urea and H2O2 with D2O.21
Argon matrix infrared spectra were recorded on a Nicolet 750
spectrometer after sample deposition, after annealing, and after
irradiation by a mercury arc lamp (Philips, 175 W, globe removed).
Experiments were also performed with H2 and O2 mixtures in order
to introduce 18O2 into the reaction products, as done for the alkaline
earth metal dihydroxide molecules.22
electrons).25 All geometrical parameters were fully optimized, and
harmonic frequencies were calculated analytically at the optimized
structures.
Results and Discussion
Reactions of coinage metal atoms with H2O2 and with H2
+ O2 mixtures are investigated, and the major metal
dihydroxide products are identified by matrix infrared
spectroscopy through isotopic substitution and comparison
to frequencies calculated by density functional theory.
Copper. Laser-ablated copper atoms were deposited with
H2O2 in an argon stream during condensation at 10 K, and
infrared spectra of this sample are illustrated in Figure 1.
The strong 3586.2 and weaker 3576.3 and 3573.4 cm-1 bands
are common to H2O2 experiments,21,23 but the sharp 3634.7
cm-1 band is unique to copper, as are the sharp bands at
773.5, 769.4, 719.4, and 468.8 cm-1 also labeled Cu(OH)2
in the lower wavenumber region. Annealing to 22 K
sharpened but did not increase these new bands, whereas
the H2O2 dimer absorptions increased about 20%, and the
OH radical absorption at 3553.0 and 3548.0 cm-1 decreased
as well.26 Visible irradiation had no effect on the spectrum.
However, ultraviolet (240-380 nm) irradiation exciting the
Theoretically, the structures and vibrational frequencies of the
Cu(OH)2, Ag(OH)2, Au(OH)2, CuOH, AgOH, and AuOH molecules
were calculated using methods employed for gold hydrides3 and
mercury dihydroxide.23,24 The 6-311++G(3df,3pd) basis was used
for H, O, and Cu. Relativistic effects were accounted for in the
SDD pseudopotential and basis for silver and gold (19 valence
(17) (a) Illas, F.; Rubio, J.; Centellas, F.; Virgili, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1984,
88, 5225. (b) Bauschlicher, C. W. Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp. 1986,
20, 563. (c) Mochizuki, Y.; Takada, T.; Murakami, A. Chem. Phys.
Lett. 1991, 185, 535.
(18) Kauffman, J. W.; Hauge, R. H.; Margrave, J. L. J Phys. Chem. 1985,
89, 3541.
(19) Wang, X.; Andrews, L. Chem. Commun. 2005, 4001.
(20) Andrews, L. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2004, 33, 123 and references therein.
(21) (a) Pettersson, M.; Tuominen, S.; Rasanen, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997,
101, 1166. (b) Pehkonen, S.; Pettersson, M.; Lundell, J.; Khriachtchev,
L.; Rasanen, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 7643.
(22) (a) Andrews, L.; Wang, X. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 11. (b) Wang, X.;
Andrews, L. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 2782.
2
2
copper S f P transition27 increased the above bands by
25%, and the more intense ultraviolet light in the full arc (λ
> 220 nm) increased the bands another 20% (Figure 1b,c).
The OCuO doublet at 823.1 and 818.7 cm-1 and weak CuOH
bands at 727.5 and 632.5 cm-1 also increased on UV
irradiation.18,28
(23) (a) Wang, X.; Andrews, L. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 108. (b) Wang,
X.; Andrews, L. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 3849.
The analogous experiment with D2O2 gave 2651.3 and
2645.7 cm-1 bands common to D2O2 investigations21 and a
sharp 2681.4 cm-1 band unique to copper along with sharp
(24) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.;
Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels,
A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone,
V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.;
Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.;
Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.;
Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.;
Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R.
L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara,
A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B. G.;
Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle,
E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, revision A.6; Gaussian, Inc.:
Pittsburgh, PA, 1998
(25) Schwerdtfeger, P.; Schwarz, W. H. E.; Bowmaker, G. A.; Boyd, P.
D. W. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 91, 1762.
(26) Cheng, B.-M.; Lee, Y.-P.; Ogilvie, J. F. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1988, 109,
151.
(27) (a) Vala, M.; Zeringue, K.; Shakhs Emampour, J.; Rivoal, J.-C.;
Pyzalski, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 80, 2401. (b) Ozin, G. A.; Gracie,
C. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 643.
(28) Chertihin, G. V.; Andrews, L.; Bauschlicher, C. W., Jr. J. Phys. Chem.
A 1997, 101, 4026.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 44, No. 24, 2005 9077