ChemComm
Communication
Fig. 3 Fluorescence images of a Zn2+-fed 5-day-old zebrafish larva obtained
by a fluorescence microscope. (a) The Naph-BPEA-stained larva (5 mM, 28.5 1C,
30 min); (b) the NBD-TPEA-stained larva (5 mM, 28.5 1C, 30 min).
was observed as the larva notochord (Fig. 3a). Such a stream is
not visible if the larva is not Zn2+-fed. Moreover, it cannot be
observed by NBD-TPEA staining even when the larva is Zn2+-fed
(Fig. 3b). The Zn2+ imaging ability in the notochord of the
zebrafish larva implies that Naph-BPEA can be a potential
in vivo imaging agent for Zn2+ involved in the development of
zebrafish.
Fig. 2 Confocal fluorescence images of HeLa cells co-stained with Hoechst
33342 (5 mg mLꢁ1 in PBS, 10 min) and Naph-BPEA (5 mM in PBS, 20 min). (a–c):
images of the co-stained cells; (d–f): images of the co-stained cells followed by
Zn2+–pyrithione incubation (5 mM, 1 : 1, 5 min); (g–i): images of Zn2+-incubated
cells treated further by TPEN (25 mM in PBS, 10 min). (a), (d) and (g): The Hoechst
channel (blue channel, lex, 351 nm, band path 420–470 nm) images; (b), (e) and
(f): the Naph-BPEA channel (green channel, lex, 488 nm, band path 500–600 nm)
images; (c), (f) and (i): overlays of the related blue/green channel images.
In conclusion, a new Zn2+ fluorescent sensor, Naph-BPEA,
was developed from 1,8-naphthalimide. Its nuclear envelope
penetrability and specific Zn2+-amplified fluorescence provide
this sensor the ability to image nuclear Zn2+ in HeLa and
HepG2 cells. The in situ nuclear Zn2+ imaging using this sensor
is esterase-independent and can be accomplished by visible
light excitation. This study also suggests that ANaph incorpora-
tion might be an effective strategy to devise a sensor with
nuclear envelope penetrability.
We thank the National Basic Research Program of China (No.
2011CB935800) and the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (No. 21271100, 21131003, 21021062, and 91213305) for
financial support.
Naph-BPEA. The intracellular distribution pattern of Naph-
BPEA suggests the possibility of simultaneously monitoring
labile Zn2+ levels in the nucleus and cytoplasm.
NBD-BPEA (Scheme 1) is a turn-on Zn2+ sensor developed
similarly via incorporating BPEA as the ICT donating group of
the ICT fluorophore 4-amino-7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole
(ANBD).9 Co-localization imaging of HeLa cells co-stained with
Hoechst 33 324 and NBD-BPEA disclosed that Zn2+ imaging via
NBD-BPEA showed only the cytosolic punctated fluorescence
pattern even upon Zn2+–pyrithione incubation (Fig. S6, ESI†).
With the identical Zn2+ chelator BPEA, Naph-BPEA and NBD-
BPEA are expected to have a similar Zn2+ binding ability, and
the dim nucleus upon Zn2+ incubation in the case of NBD-BPEA
implies that there are no sensor molecules distributed in the
nucleus. The different intracellular distribution patterns
between NBD-BPEA and Naph-BPEA suggest that the DNA-
targeting ANaph might be the origin for the nuclear envelope
penetrability of Naph-BPEA. In fact, its analogue Naph-BPEA-e
with the ethyl tail displays also the nuclear envelope penetr-
ability (Scheme 1 and Fig. S7, ESI†). The nucleus penetrability
of Naph-BPEA does not have evident impact on the cell viability,
and the cells appear to show the normal morphology during the
imaging process. The MTT assays disclosed that the cellular
viability of HeLa and HepG2 cells after 48 h of Naph-BPEA
incubation (5 mM) is 94.5 ꢀ 2.0% and 98.5 ꢀ 1.0%, respectively.
The nuclear Zn2+ imaging ability and nuclear envelope
penetrability of Naph-BPEA inspire us to determine its in vivo
Zn2+ imaging ability in a transparent zebrafish larva (5-day-old).
The larva image obtained via Naph-BPEA staining displays the
two zygomorphic fluorescent regions around its ventricle, simi-
lar to the image obtained via staining with a Zn2+ sensor NBD-
TPEA.10 Moreover, the additional fluorescent stream in the tail
Notes and references
1 (a) S. L. Sensi, D. Ton-That, P. G. Sullivan, E. A. Jonas, K. R. Gee, L. K.
Kaczmarek and J. H. Weiss, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2003,
100, 6157; (b) Y. Qin, P. J. Dittmer, J. G. Park, K. B. Jansen and
A. E. Palmer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2011, 108, 7351.
2 (a) J. G. Miranda, A. L. Weaver, Y. Qin, J. G. Park, C. I. Stoddard,
M. Z. Lin and A. E. Palmer, PLoS One, 2012, 7, e49371; (b) H. Hasse
and D. Beyersmann, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2002, 296, 923.
3 (a) K. Tsujikawa, T. Imai, M. Kakutani, Y. Kayamori, T. Mimura, N. Otaki,
M. Kimura, R. Fukuyama and N. Shimizu, FEBS Lett., 1991, 283, 239;
(b) P. Coyle, P. D. Zalewski, J. C. Philcox, I. J. Forbest, A. D. Ward,
S. F. Lincoln, I. Mahadevan and A. M. Rofe, Biochem. J., 1994, 303, 781.
4 (a) C. Andreini, L. Banci, I. Bertini and A. Rosato, J. Proteome Res.,
2006, 5, 3173; (b) C. Andreini, L. Banci, I. Bertini and A. Rosato,
J. Proteome Res., 2006, 5, 196.
5 L. M. T. Canzoniero, D. M. Turetsky and D. W. Choi, J. Neurosci.,
1999, 19, RC31.1.
6 S. Banerjee, E. B. Veale, C. M. Phelan, S. A. Murphy, G. M. Tocci,
L. J. Gillespie, D. O. Frimannsson, J. M. Kelly and T. Gunnlaugsson,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 1601.
7 (a) E. B. Veale, D. O. Frimannsson, M. Lawler and T. Gunnlaugsson,
Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 4040; (b) E. B. Veale and T. Gunnlaugsson, J. Org.
Chem., 2010, 75, 5513.
8 S. Uchiyama, Y. Matsumura, A. P. de Silva and K. Iwai, Anal. Chem.,
2003, 75, 5926.
9 W. Jiang, Q. Fu, H. Fan and W. Wang, Chem. Commun., 2008, 259.
10 F. Qian, C. Zhang, Y. Zhang, W. He, X. Gao, P. Hu and Z. Guo, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 1460.
c
11432 Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 11430--11432
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013