J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 2987-2988
2987
Synthesis, Spectroscopy, and Morphology of
Tetrastilbenoidmethanes
Scheme 1. Products Obtained from the Reaction of 1 with
Different Stilbenoid Compounds in the Presence of Pd(OAc)
NBu Br/DMF/K CO
2
/
4
2
3
†
Warren J. Oldham, Jr., Rene J. Lachicotte, and
Guillermo C. Bazan*
Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Rochester
Rochester, New York 14627
ReceiVed December 12, 1997
Low band gap molecular and polymeric organic materials are
currently being considered for the active component in a variety
of optoelectronic devices, most notably as the emissive layer in
light-emitting diodes.1 It is generally believed that the morphol-
ogy adopted by these materials plays a fundamental role in de-
fining their bulk performance. For example, completely amor-
phous and ultrapure thin films appear to provide the longest device
lifetimes, combined with the highest efficiency and emissive
brightness.2 While sufficiently pure films of low molecular weight
fluorescent compounds can be obtained by sublimation under high
vacuum, these tend to recrystallize over time, thus precipitating
device failure.3 Luminescent polymeric materials can be designed
to remain amorphous, even at elevated temperatures, but they are
more difficult to obtain in high purity.4,5 Furthermore, the close
association of polymer chains in the solid state can lead to
crystalline domains.6 Ordered polymer regions appear to reduce
emission efficiency by promoting low-energy non- or weakly
The parent compound in this series, tetrastilbenylmethane (2),
is obtained via palladium-catalyzed Heck coupling of tetrakis(4-
iodophenyl)methane12 (1) with styrene (see Scheme 1). Reac-
7
emissive excimer or aggregate states. Ultimately, because of
facile energy migration, these low-energy sites can dominate the
optical properties, even when present in small concentration.8
In this paper, we describe a strategy to obtain precisely defined
and readily purified luminescent materials of intermediate mo-
lecular size with amorphous morphology. For this purpose, new
molecules containing a tetrahedral array of four stilbenoid units
13
14
tions carried out under phase-transfer conditions were found to
give the highest yields (86%), and this procedure was used
exclusively in subsequent coupling reactions. Slightly reduced
15
yields (70%) were obtained using the Herrmann catalyst, and
only traces of 2 were observed using the traditional catalyst
3
coupled to a central sp -hybridized carbon atom have been
16
system composed of a mixture of Pd(OAc)
2
and P(o-tol)
3
.
prepared.9 The rigid tetrahedral framework orients the chromo-
phores such that the possibility of intramolecular π-stacking is
minimized. These molecules are highly symmetrical and might
be expected to favor a crystalline morphology, as observed for
most structures which incorporate a tetraphenylmethane core.10
However, we show that when the stilbenoid units are sufficiently
long, crystalline packing becomes unfavorable and a stable
amorphous phase is obtained.11
Incomplete reaction was observed, even under optimized condi-
11
tions, if tetrakis(4-bromophenyl)methane was substituted for 1.
Reactions carried out with pentafluorostyrene gave tetrakis-
(
pentafluorostilbenyl)methane (3), which is only slightly soluble
17
in aromatic or chlorinated solvents.
Longer stilbenoid arms were obtained by coupling 4,4′-tert-
18
butylvinylstilbene with 1 to yield the pale yellow and freely
19
soluble tetrakis(4-tert-butylstyrylstilbenyl)methane (4). Com-
pounds 3 and 4 were isolated in yields of 31 and 17%,
respectively. The low yields for these two reactions are attributed
to the insolubility of partially coupled intermediates, which were
observed to precipitate from solution during early reaction times.
Appropriate NMR and analytical data were obtained for each
†
Current address: FED Corporation, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533.
(
1) Forrest, S. R.; Burrows, P. E.; Thompson, M. E. Laser Focus World
1
995, 31, 99-101.
(
2) Sheats, J. R.; Antoniadis, H.; Hueschen, M.; Leonard, W.; Miller, J.;
Moon, R.; Roitman, D.; Stocking, A. Science 1996, 273, 884-888.
(
(
3) Naito, K. Chem. Mater. 1994, 6, 2343-2350.
4) Dendritic conjugated polymers show glassy properties: Deb, S. K.;
1
compound. Importantly, H NMR signals attributed to unreacted
Maddux, T. M.; Yu, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9079-9080.
4-iodophenyl groups were not observed.
(
5) Surface morphology of conjugated polymers can be modified by
The absorption and emission spectra for 2 and 4 dissolved in
CHCl are shown in Figure 1. The respective absorbance and
3
constructing star-shaped structures: Wang, F.; Rauh, R. D.; Rose, T. L. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11106-11107.
(
6) Prosa, T. J.; Winokur, M. J.; McCollough, R. D. Macromolecules 1996,
2
9, 3654-3656.
(11) See also: Wilson, L. M.; Griffin, A. C. J. Mater. Chem. 1993, 3,
991-994.
(12) Su, D.; Menger, F. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 1485-1488.
(
7) Conwell, E. Trends Polym. Sci. 1997, 5, 218-222 and references
therein.
1
(
8) Guillet, J. E. Polymer Photophysics and Photochemistry; Cambridge
2 2
(13) Data for 2: H NMR (CD Cl ) 7.52 (d, J ) 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.47, 7.31
University Press: Cambridge, U.K. 1985.
(AA′BB′ pattern, J ) 8.5 Hz, 2 H each), 7.36 (t, J ) 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.26 (t,
(
9) Cubane and adamantane frameworks have been used in the formation
J ) 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.13 (s, 2 H, vinylene). Anal. Calcd for C57H44: C, 93.9;
of stable organic glasses containing mesogenic groups. See: Chen, S. H.;
H, 6.1. Found: C, 94.00; H, 5.99.
Shi, H.; Conger, B. M.; Mastrangelo, J. C.; Tsutsui, T. AdV. Mater. 1996, 8,
(14) (a) Jeffery, T. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 1287-1289. (b)
9
98-1001. For alternative approaches, see: Shirota, Y.; Kobata, T.; Noma,
Jeffery, T. AdV. Metal-Organic Chem. 1996, 5, 153-260.
N. Chem. Lett. 1989, 1145-1148. Ishikawa, W.; Inada, H.; Nakano, Y. Shirota,
(15) Herrmann, W. A.; Brossmer, C.; O¨ fele, K.; Reisinger, C.-P.; Priermeier,
T.; Beller, M.; Fischer, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 1844-1847.
Y. Chem. Lett. 1991, 1731-1734. Bettenhausen, J.; Strohriegl, P. AdV. Mater.
1
3
996, 8, 507-510. Salbeck, J.; Bauer, J.; Weissortel, F. Polym. Prepr. 1997,
8, 349.
(16) Heck, R. F. Org. React. 1982, 27, 345-389.
1
(17) Data for 3: H NMR (C
D
6 6
) 7.42, 7.26 (AA′BB′ pattern, J ) 8.4 Hz,
(
10) For example, see: (a) Hoskins, B. F.; Robson, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2 H each), 7.29, 6.82 (AB pattern, J ) 16.4 Hz, 1 H each). Anal. Calcd for
20: C, 62.9; H, 2.22; F, 34.90. Found: C, 63.17; H, 2.07; F, 34.00.
(18) Oldham, W. J., Jr.; Miao, Y.-J.; Lachicotte, R. J.; Bazan G. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 419-420.
1
990, 112, 1546-1554. (b) Simard, M.; Su, D.; Wuest, J. D. J. Am. Chem.
57 24
C H F
Soc. 1991, 113, 4696-4698. (c) Reddy, D. S.; Craig, D. C.; Desiraju, G. R.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4090-4093.
S0002-7863(97)04209-1 CCC: $15.00 © 1998 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 03/17/1998