Fmoc-DANA proved to be an excellent amino acid for solid
phase synthesis using standard protocols. No loss in optical
activity was observed upon incorporation of the amino acid into
the peptide, elongation of the peptide, or cleavage of the peptide
from the solid phase.16 The solvent dependence of a short
peptide (A-(DANA)-A) was evaluated and found to be similar
to that of parent fluorophore, PRODAN, indicating that no
significant change of its fluorescence properties had occurred as
a result of its incorporation into a peptide scaffold (see ESI† for
figure).16
To outline the utility of this amino acid, the well-charac-
terized RNase S model system, consisting of a 15 amino acid S-
peptide which associates tightly with S-protein (Ka 106–107
M21) to give catalytically active ribonuclease S (RNase S), was
employed.18,19 The amino acid DANA was incorporated into
the S-Peptide and the changes in the fluorescence of DANA
were observed upon binding to the S-Protein. These changes led
directly to the dissociation constants for the newly synthesized
peptides.
binding mode could be favored over a 5–45 °C temperature
range suggesting both modes to be similar in energy. Analysis
of the titration data leads directly to an affinity constant of 3.0
3 106 M21
.
The first facile synthesis of Fmoc-DANA has been reported
in both high yield and high enantioselectivity. DANA was
incorporated into peptides using solid phase synthesis and
shown to retain similar fluorescent properties to PRODAN.
Given the recent advances in protein labeling using in vitro
biosynthesis22 and chemical ligation23 techniques this amino
acid should prove to be a valuable tool for the study of protein–
protein interactions.
This research was supported by the NSF (CHE-9996335) and
the NIH (GM64346 Cell Migration Consortium). The award of
an NSERC postdoctoral fellowship to M. N. is also gratefully
acknowledged.
Note added at proof: after submission of this manuscript
similar work appeared in Science web alerts 30/05/02.24
Two peptides which, based upon the crystal structure of
RNase S and literature examples, would place the DANA amino
acid in a highly hydrophilic (5)20 or hydrophobic environment
(6)21 were synthesized by standard solid phase synthesis.
Notes and references
1 Fluorescent and Luminescent Probes for Biological Activity, ed. W. T.
Mason, Academic Press, London, UK, 1999.
2 G. Weber and F. J. Farris, Biochemistry, 1979, 19, 3075.
3 A. Samanta and R. W. Fessenden, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2000, 104, 8972;
F. M. Cerezo, S. C. Rocafort, P. S. Sierra, F. García-Bianco, C. D. Oliva
and J. C. Sierra, Helv. Chim. Acta, 2001, 84, 3306.
4 L.-G. P. Chong, Biochemistry, 1988, 27, 399; J. Zeng and L.-G. P.
Chong, Biophys. J., 1995, 68, 567; M. E. C. D. R. Olivera, G.
Hungerford, M. G. Miguel and H. D. Burrows, J. Mol. Struct., 2001,
563, 443.
5 T. Hiratsuka, Biochemistry, 1998, 37, 7167–7176.
6 S. S. Lehrer and Y. Ishii, Biochemistry, 1988, 27, 5899.
7 K. G. Harikumar, D. I. Pinon, W. S. Wessels, F. G. Prendergast and J.
L. Miller, J. Biol. Chem., 2002, in press.
Peptide 5 KETAAAXFERQHLDS X = DANA
Peptide 6 KETAAAKFERQHLXS
Fig. 1 illustrates the large changes in fluorescence emission
spectrum of DANA upon binding to the S-protein. Peptide 5,
which places DANA in a solvent exposed position upon
binding, gave a 26% reduction in fluorescence intensity at 520
nm after saturation with Pro-S protein. Comparison of the
titration data to a literature S-peptide containing a fluorescein
labeled lysine at the equivalent position revealed DANA to have
twice as large a fluorescence intensity change upon binding but
10 times weaker affinity for the Pro-S protein (Ka 1.6 3 107
M21 vs. Ka 1.6 3 108 M21(lit)).20 The decreased affinity is
likely due to the closer proximity of the DANA fluorophore to
the peptide backbone which could lead to steric congestion
upon binding.
In contrast, peptide 6 exhibits a large increase in fluorescence
upon binding to the Pro-S protein leading to the development of
a fluorescence emission band at 450 nm that was completely
absent before binding. The presence of two bands in the Pro-S
protein saturated emission spectra may indicate that DANA is
binding in two modes to the Pro-S protein, one of which places
the fluorophore in a hydrophobic environment leading to the
450 nm emission band and a second band at 510–520 nm which
places DANA in a more solvent exposed environment. Neither
8 T. Hiratsuka, J. Biol. Chem., 1999, 274, 29159.
9 G. Sui, P. Kele, J. Orbulescu, Q. Hou and R. M. Leblanc, Lett. Pept. Sci.,
2002, 8, 47; N. Jotterand, D. A. Pearce and B. Imperiali, J. Org. Chem.,
2001, 66, 3224; A. Rzeska, J. Malicka, K. Guzow, M. Szabelski and W.
J. Wiczk, Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem., 2001, 146, 9; M. Taki, T.
Hohsaka, H. Murakami, K. Taira and M. Sisido, FEBS Lett., 2001, 507,
35; K. Guzow, M. Szabelski, J. Malicka and W. Wiczk, Helv. Chim.
Acta, 2001, 84, 1086.
10 I. Dufau and H. Mararguil, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41, 6063; S.
Uchiyama, T. Santa and K. Imai, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1999,
2524.
11 For recent reviews see (a) M. J. O’Donnell, Aldrichim. Acta, 2001, 34,
3; (b) T. Abellán, R. Chinchilla, N. Galindo, G. Guillena, C. Nájera and
J. M. Sansano, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2000, 2689.
12 M. J. O’Donnell, W. D. Bennet and S. Wu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989,
111, 2353.
13 E. J. Corey, F. Xu and M. C. Noe, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119,
12414.
14 (a) B. Lygo and P. G. Wainwright, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 8595;
(b) M. J. O’Donnell, F. Delgado and R. S. Pottof, Tetrahedron, 1999, 55,
6347.
15 Z. Diwu, C. Beachdel and D. H. Klaubert, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39,
4987.
16 Details contained in ESI†.
17 The absolute stereochemistry was deduced from the literature precedent
of
literature precedent of the
eluting before the -enantiomer when analyzed by reverse phase HPLC.
L
-Cinchonidine derived catalyst producing the
L-enantiomer and the
L
-Marfey diastereomer of most amino acids
D
K. Fugii, Y. Ikai, T. Mayumi, H. Oka, M. Suzuki and K. Harada, Anal.
Chem., 1997, 69, 3346.
18 F. M. Richards and P. J. Vithayathil, J. Biol. Chem., 1959, 234, 1459.
19 P. R. Connelly, R. Varadarajan, J. M. Sturtevant and F. M. Richards,
Biochemistry, 1990, 29, 6108.
20 J. M. Goldberg and R. L. Baldwin, Biochemistry, 1998, 37, 2546.
21 E. E. Kim, R. Varadarajan, H. W. Wyckoff and F. Richards,
Biochemistry, 1992, 31, 12304.
22 L. Wang and P. G. Schultz, Chem. Commun., 2002, 1; L. Wang, A.
Brock, B. Herberich and P. G. Schultz, Science, 2001, 292, 498 and
references therein.
23 T. W. Muir, Synlett, 2001, 6, 733 and references therein.
24 B. E. Cohen, T. M. McAnaney, E. S. Park, N. Y. Jan, S. G. Boxer and
L. Y. Jan, Science, 2002, 296, 1700.
Fig. 1 Fluorescence emission spectra of peptides 5 and 6. Top: peptide 5 (2.8
mM) in absence (hashed) and presence (12 mM) (bold) of saturating Pro-S
protein. Bottom: peptide 6 (2.5 mM) in absence (hashed) and presence (16
mM) (bold) of saturating Pro-S protein. All spectra were collected in 10 mM
HEPES pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl at 20 °C with excitation at 367 nm.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 1912–1913
1913