4
36
Acknowledgements
Professor Miguel J. Dabdoub thanks CNPq for financial support.
References
1
. (a) Hiiro, T.; Kambe, N.; Ogawa, A.; Miyoshi, N.; Sonoda, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 1187. (b) Kanda, T.;
Kato, S.; Sugino, T.; Kambe, N.; Sonoda, N. J. Organometal. Chem. 1994, 473, 71. (c) Dabdoub, M. J.; Comasseto, J. V.
Organometallics 1988, 7, 84. (d) Engman, L.; Stern, D. Organometallics 1993, 12, 1445.
2
. (a) Dabdoub, M. J.; Begnini, M. L.; Cassol, T. M.; Guerrero Jr., P. G.; Silveira, C. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 7623, and
references cited therein. (b) Ogawa, A.; Tsuboi, Y.; Obayashi, R.; Yokoyama, K.; Ryu, I.; Sonoda, N. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
5
9, 1600. (c) Barros, S. M.; Dabdoub, M. J.; Dabdoub, V. B.; Comasseto, J. V. Organometallics 1989, 8, 1661. (d) Barros,
S. M.; Comasseto, J. V.; Berriel, J. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 7353. (e) Dabdoub, M. J.; Dabdoub, V. B.; Pereira, M. A.;
Zukerman-Schpector, J. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 9503. (f) Dabdoub, M. J.; Dabdoub, V. B.; Guerrero Jr., P. G.; Silveira, C.
C. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 4199. (g) Mo, X.-S.; Huang, Y.-Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3539. (h) Huang, Y.-Z.; Mo, X.-S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 1945.
3
. (a) Comasseto, J. V.; Berriel, J. N. Synth. Commun. 1990, 20, 1681. (b) Tucci, F. C.; Chieffi, A.; Comasseto, J. V. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1992, 33, 5721. (c) Marino, J. P.; Tucci, F. C.; Comasseto, J. V. Synlett 1993, 761. (d) Chieffi, A.; Comasseto, J. V.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 1993. (e) Araujo, M.; Comasseto, J. V. Synlett 1995, 1145.
4
5
6
. Terao, J.; Kambe, N.; Sonoda, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 4741.
. Stüdemann, T.; Gupta, V.; Engman, L.; Knochel, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 1005.
. Uchiyama, M.; Kameda, M.; Mishima, O.; Yokoyama, N.; Koike, M.; Kondo, Y.; Sakamoto, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
1
20, 4934.
7
8
9
. (a) Negishi, E.; Takahashi, T.; Baba, S.; Van Horn, D. E.; Okukado, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 2393. (b) Negishi, E.;
Ay, M.; Gulevich, Y. V.; Noda, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 1437.
. Different presentations of Et
1.1 M) or neat. Similar results were obtained using Me
. Different results were obtained using neat Et Zn or a solution (1.0 M) of this reagent in toluene.
2
Zn used in this work were purchased from Aldrich as solutions in hexane (1.0 M), in toluene
(
2
Zn (2.0 M in toluene).
2
1
0. (a) Han, X.; Stoltz, B. M.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 1212, 7600. (b) Takeda, T.; Matsunaga, K.; Kabasawa, Y.;
Fujiwara, T. Chem. Lett. 1995, 771.
1
1. Typical procedure: To a solution of compound 2 (1.0 mmol) in THF (5 mL), Pd(PPh
g, 1.0 mmol) and DMF (5 mL) were added at room temperature under N . Then a commercial dimethylzinc solution
3.0 mL) (2.0 M, in toluene) was transferred dropwise via syringe. The dark brown resulting mixture was stirred for 3
3 4
) (0.055 g; 0.05 mmol), CuI (0.19
2
(
h (followed by TLC) and was carefully treated with water and extracted with diethyl ether. The product was purified by
column chromatography using hexane as eluent.