By replacing insoluble resins with these soluble scaffolds,
the solution-phase reaction conditions will be reinstated. After
reactions, a second solvent is usually introduced for the
selective precipitation of matrixes out of the reaction mixtures
consisting of a magnetic iron oxide core surrounded by a
layer of lightly cross-linked polymeric shell wall. The organic
polymer shells stabilize nanoparticles by preventing aggrega-
tion of inorganic cores and offer a platform for immobiliza-
tion of catalysts. For the solubility of nanoparticles in organic
media, shell walls are usually thin (∼nm) and the shell
(JandaJel and ROMP gels) or for the extraction of the
scaffolds into the orthogonal liquid phase (perfluorinated
tags). Although tremendous progress has been made in this
area, there is still a need to develop new types of soluble
supports, especially those that can be widely employed in
chemical and pharmaceutical industries. The large-scale
introduction of a second solvent in an industrial process can
potentially increase the costs and generate more waste,
leading to environmental concerns.
10
polymers are preferred to have low molecular weights. Iron
oxide cores will respond to a magnetic field but retain no
magnetization properties when the field is removed. The lack
of magnetic remanence prevents nanoparticles from forming
magnetized clumps in the reaction media. In addition,
unusually high magnetization moments of “super”paramag-
netic materials allow the use of low-field magnets to
efficiently concentrate magnetic nanoparticles. In this paper,
we would like to report our preliminary studies demonstrating
the feasibility of using this new class of materials for
supporting homogeneous catalysts. The Pd catalysts im-
mobilized on magnetic core/shell nanoparticles can be
facilely recovered by using an external permanent magnet
that is readily available at a low cost from many commercial
vendors.
Nanoparticles have emerged as alternative soluble matrixes
8
for supporting homogeneous organic reactions. This is
because when the size of the support materials is decreased
to the nanometer scale, the surface area of nanoparticles will
increase dramatically. As a consequence, nanoparticle sup-
ports could have higher catalyst loading capacity than many
conventional support matrixes, leading to the improved
catalytic activity of the nanoparticle-supported catalysts. In
addition, catalysts are usually immobilized on the surface
of nanoclusters. Reactants in solution have easy access to
the active sites on the surface of nanoparticles, avoiding the
problems encountered in many heterogeneous support ma-
trixes where a great portion of catalysts are present deep
inside the matrix backbones and reactants have the limited
access to the catalytic sites. Among many nanomaterials,
monolayer-protected Au nanoclusters (Au MPCs) have
received particular research attention due to their stability
and solubility in organic solvents. Recent studies have
confirmed the high catalytic activity of Au MPC-supported
The core/shell iron oxide/polymer nanocrystals used for
immobilizing Pd catalysts were synthesized via a novel
emulsion polymerization approach (Scheme 1).11 Vigorous
Scheme 1. Emulsion Polymerization Synthesis of Core/Shell
Iron Oxide/Polymer Nanocrystalsa
8c
catalysts. However, facile isolation and recycling of nano-
particle supports from reaction media have remained a
challenge. Additional laboratory work is usually required for
the judicious selection of addition of a second solvent to
selectively precipitate Au nanoparticles out of the reaction
medium.
a
Organic polymeric shell consists of lightly cross-linked poly-
Superparamagnetic nanoparticles are a new type of soluble
matrix that potentially can address the isolation and recycling
problems encountered in Au MPCs and other soluble
supports for immobilization of homogeneous catalysts. These
mers of styrene and VBC. DVB: 1,4-divinylbenzene. VBC: 1,4-
vinylbenzyl chloride.
9
stirring facilitated the formation of micelles of pluronic
surfactant P-123 in an aqueous medium. Highly crystalline
magnetic nanoparticles usually have a core/shell structure
(6) (a) Harned, A. M.; He, H. S.; Toy, P. H.; Flynn, D. L.; Hanson, P.
and monodisperse γ-Fe
2
O
3
nanocrystals (∼11 nm) coated
R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 52. (b) Ralph, C. K.; Akotsi, O. M.;
Bergens, S. H. Organometallics 2004, 23, 1484. (c) Enholm, E. J.; Gallagher,
M. E. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3397. (d) Årstad, E.; Barrett, A. G. M.; Hopkins,
B. T.; K o¨ bberling, J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1975.
1
2
with a layer of oleate were encapsulated inside the interior
cores of micelles due to the hydrophobic alkyl chains of the
oleate molecules. Styrene, 4-vinylbenzene chloride (VBC),
and 1,4-divinylbenzene (DVB) were added and entrapped
(7) For some recent references: (a) Bergbreiter, D. E.; Osburn, P. L.;
Smith, T.; Li, C.; Frels, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6254. (b) Lau,
K. C. Y.; He, H. S.; Chiu, P.; Toy, P. H. J. Comb. Chem. 2004, 6, 955. (c)
Hebel, A.; Haag, R. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 9452. (d) Zhong, J.-H.;
Fishman, A.; Lee-Ruff, E. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4415.
(e) Dyal, A.; Loos, K.; Noto, M.; Chang, S. W.; Spagnoli, C.; Shafi, K. V.
P. M.; Ulman, A.; Cowman, M.; Gross, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 1684. (f) Gu, H.; Ho, P.-L.; Tsang, K. W. T.; Wang, L.; Xu, B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15702.
(10) Commercial magnetic beads with a size over several microns are
usually suspended in most organic media due to the high molecular weights
of their shell walls.
(11) Similar approach was used for the synthesis of polystyrene nano-
particles using micelle templates: Jang, J.; Ha, H. Langmuir 2002, 18, 5613.
(12) (a) Hyeon, T.; Lee, S. S.; Park, J.; Chung, Y.; Na, H. B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12798. (b) Lu, J.; Fan, J.; Xu, R.; Roy, S.; Ali, N.;
Gao, Y. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 258, 427.
(8) (a) Templeton, A. C.; Hostetler, M. J.; Warmoth, E. K.; Chen, S.;
Hartshorn, C. M.; Krishnamurthy, V. M.; Forbes, M. D. E.; Murray, R. W.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4845. (b) Fan, J.; Chen, S.; Gao, Y. Colloids
Surf., B 2003, 28, 199. (c) Marubayashi, K.; Takizawa, S.; Kawakusu, T.;
Arai, T.; Sasai, H. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4409. (d) Kell, A. J.; Stringle, D. L.
B.; Workentin, M. S. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3381. (e) Yoon, T.-J.; Lee, W.;
Oh, Y.-S.; Lee, J.-K. New J. Chem. 2003, 27, 227.
(
9) (a) Li, G.; Fan, J.; Jiang, R.; Gao, Y. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 1835.
(
b) Vestal, C. R.; Zhang, Z. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14312. (c)
Wang, Y.; Teng, X.; Wang, J.-S.; Yang, H. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 789. (d)
Kohler, N.; Fryxell, G. E.; Zhang, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7206.
2086
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 11, 2005