1262
A. Moreno et al.
LETTER
(4) (a) Loupy, A.; Petit, A.; Hamelin, J.; Texier-Boullet, F.;
Jacquault, P.; Mathé, D. Synthesis 1998, 1213. (b) Varma,
R. S. Green Chem. 1999, 1, 43.
(5) Loupy, A.; Bram, G.; Sansoulet, J. New J. Chem. 1992, 16,
233.
calculated atomic coefficients. The calculated atomic co-
efficients in the frontier molecular orbital using the
AMPAC program16 with the RHF/AM1 method are
shown in Figure 1.
(6) de la Hoz, A.; Díaz-Ortiz, A.; Moreno, A.; Langa, F. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2000, 3659.
(7) de la Hoz, A.; Díaz-Ortiz, A.; Fraile, J. M.; Gómez, M. V.;
Mayoral, J. A.; Moreno, A.; Saiz, A.; Vazquez, E. Synlett
2001, 753.
OH
0.5691
O
–0.5726
COOCH3
CH2CH3
2
(8) (a) Hart, H.; Nwokogu, G. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 1251.
(b) Huang, N. Z.; Xing, Y. D.; Xe, D. Y. Synthesis 1982,
1041. (c) Xing, Y. D.; Huang, N. Z. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47,
140. (d) Wong, H. N. C.; Ng, T.-K.; Wong, T.-Y.
Heterocycles 1983, 20, 1815. (e) Wong, H. N. C.; Xing, Y.
D.; Zhou, Y. F.; Gong, Q. Q.; Zhang, C. Synthesis 1984,
787. (f) Wong, H. N. C.; Ng, T.-K.; Wong, T.-Y.; Xing, Y.
D. Heterocycles 1984, 22, 875.
0.5891 –0.4193
9
COOCH3
0.5470
CH2CH3
OH
5
O
–0.4799
MO
Si(M)
C- OCH3
3
11
(9) (a) Chambers, R. D.; Roche, A. J.; Rock, M. H. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1996, 1095. (b) Martin-Matute, B.;
Nevado, C.; Cardenas, D. J.; Echavarren, A. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5757.
COOCH3
OCH3
(10) (a) Padwa, A.; Dimitroff, M.; Waterson, A. G.; Wu, T. J.
Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 4088. (b) Zhu, G.-D.; Staeger, M. A.;
Boyd, S. A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3345.
Figure 1
(11) (a) Maggiani, A.; Tubul, A.; Brun, P. Synthesis 1997, 631.
(b) Maggiani, A.; Tubul, A.; Brun, P. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 4485.
(12) Rhodes, C. N.; Brown, D. R. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans.
1993, 89, 1387.
(13) (a) Cativiela, C.; Fraile, J. M.; García, J. I.; Mayoral, J. A.;
Pires, E.; Royo, A. J.; Figueras, F.; de Mérnoval, L. C.
Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 4073. (b) Cativiela, C.; Figueras, F.;
García, J. I.; Mayoral, J. A.; Pires, E.; Royo, A. J.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993, 4, 621.
In conclusion, the synthesis of a range of phenolic deriva-
tives has been achieved using heterogeneous catalysis
under microwave irradiation. The products are easily pre-
pared in a single step by cycloaddition of furans followed
by ring opening of the oxabicyclo intermediate through
the action of Si(Zn). A variety of phenolic derivatives can
be synthesised by selecting the appropriate reactants. This
method represents a simple, general and useful alternative
for the preparation of some polysubstituted phenols
whose synthesis is difficult by other methods.
(14) Typical Experimental Procedure: A mixture of furan (1–
3, 9.0 mmol), an acetylenic dienophile (4 and 5, 1.5 mmol)
and silica-supported Lewis acid (0.5 g) was charged to a
commercial 25 mL Teflon PTFE vessel. The vessel was
closed and irradiated in a Miele Electronic M720 microwave
oven at 450 W during 30 min. In all reactions the compounds
were isolated by adding 50 mL of CH2Cl2 to the mixture and
separating the catalyst by filtration. The solvent was
removed from the filtrate under reduced pressure and the
Computational studies are in progress in order to explain
the observed high regioselectivity.
Acknowledgment
Financial support from the Spanish DGESIC (Project, BQU2001-
1095 and PPQ2002-04012-C03-01) and Junta de Comunidades de
Castilla-La Mancha (Project PAI-02-019) is gratefully acknowled-
ged. One of us (V. G.) wishes to acknowledge a grant from Spanish
MECD.
crude reaction mixtures were analysed by 1H NMR and 13
C
NMR spectroscopy in CDCl3. The products were purified by
column chromatography on silica gel (hexane–EtOAc 8:1
for compound 9 and 3:1 for product 11)17 or by distillation
under reduced pressure in a Kugelrohr apparatus (for
compounds 6,18 7,19 8 and 1020). Yields were determined by
1H NMR spectroscopy using CH2Br2 (d = 4.93 ppm) as an
internal standard. It should be remarked that for the reactions
in entries 15 and 23 (Table 1) the isolated yields show
differences of between 3% and 7% less than the calculated
yields using CH2Br2 as internal standard, thus demonstrating
the accuracy of this method. All compounds were
References
(1) (a) Fraile, J. M.; García, J. I.; Massam, J.; Mayoral, J. A.;
Pires, E. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1997, 123, 43. (b) Fraile,
J. M.; García, J. I.; Gracia, D.; Mayoral, J. A.; Pires, E. J.
Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 9479.
(2) Fraile, J. M.; García, J. I.; Gómez, M. A.; de la Hoz, A.;
Mayoral, J. A.; Moreno, A.; Prieto, P.; Salvatella, L.;
Vazquez, E. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 2891.
(3) (a) Mingos, D. P. M.; Whittaker, A. G. Microwave
Dielectric Heating Effects in Chemical Synthesis, In
Chemistry under Extreme or non-Classical Conditions;
Eldik, R.; Hubbard, C. D., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1997.
(b) Caddick, S. Tetrahedron 1995, 52, 10403. (c) Lidström,
P.; Tierney, J.; Wathey, B.; Westman, J. Tetrahedron 2001,
57, 9225. (d) Microwaves in Organic Synthesis; Loupy, A.,
Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2002.
characterised by analytical methods and 1H NMR and 13
NMR spectroscopy, using one- and two-dimensional
techniques. The new compounds exhibit NMR spectra
consistent with their structures and gave satisfactory
molecular weight determinations (mass spectrometry).21
Catalysts modified with Lewis acids were obtained by
C
treating silica gel with 1 M solutions of ZnCl2, AlEt2Cl or
TiCl4 following the previously described method.12,13 The
silica contained 1.5 mmol of Zn g–1, 1.4 mmol of Al g–1 and
1.2 mmol of Ti g–1, respectively, as determined by plasma
emission spectroscopy. For the Si(Zn) catalyst, activation
Synlett 2004, No. 7, 1259–1263 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York