Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
preference, which means that the mutations in Rma TDE
of new carbene transfer biocatalysts for chemical synthesis. In
order to further tailor these enzymes for new catalytic
applications, we sought to engineer and characterize an
enzyme variant with inverted chemoselectivity, favoring
amination over silylation.
1
somehow enhance chemoselectivity for Si−C bond formation.
The mechanisms of imidazole-ligated iron porphyrin-
catalyzed carbene transfers to N−H and Si−H bonds were
compared for the reaction of p-dimethylsilylaniline (Figure
3
a,b). N−H functionalization can occur through a concerted
We investigated the engineering of Rma TDE to favor the
amination product of p-dimethylsilylaniline (7) instead of the
competing silylation product (8), which Rma TDE prefers. We
hypothesized that this altered selectivity could be achieved by
modulating the conformational dynamics of the front loop. To
test this, we introduced selectivity-altering mutations to three
selected positions to modify the front loop conformation,
guided by MD simulations. Taking Rma TDE as parent
protein, the amino acid residues chosen for site-saturation
mutagenesis were E103, M99, and N80 (Figure 4). E103 (on
the front loop) was selected because it was previously shown to
N−H insertion mechanism akin to that discussed earlier for
Si−H insertion (Figure 3c) or through nucleophilic attack by
the nitrogen lone pair followed by subsequent hydrogen shift
11,19
from the ylide (Figure 3b).
By use of DFT calculations to
model the reaction between imidazole-ligated IPC and para-
dimethylsilylaniline 6, the preferred amination pathway was
determined to be N-nucleophilic attack followed by ylide
rearrangement, in agreement with Shaik’s previous mechanistic
proposal. This transition state for nucleophilic amination is
lower in energy than that for concerted Si−H insertion (ΔΔG
=
1
1
⧧
−
1
1
3.5 kcal·mol , Figure 3a−c); thus, in the absence of the
affect the chemoselectivity. Residues M99 (on the front loop)
protein scaffold, amination is preferred over Si−H carbene
insertion. In addition, silylation and amination have geometri-
cally distinct transition states, as the required substrate
approaches to the carbene carbon are different in these
reactions (Figure 3a,b).
and N80 (on the D helix of Rma cyt c) were selected because
our MD simulations suggested that these residues might play
an important role in determining front loop conformation by
We generated site-saturation mutagenesis libraries at each of
the three sites and screened the variants for chemoselectivity,
as quantified by the product ratios of carbene transfer to an
amine substrate (p-isopropylaniline) and a silane substrate
(dimethylphenylsilane, 1) in a single competition reaction.
Variants displaying improved selectivity for the amination
reaction were then evaluated for their chemoselectivity on p-
dimethylsilylaniline (6). The most amination-selective variants
from each library were determined to be E103I, M99P, and
N80F, which produced the amination product as 27−34% of
the total product, as compared to 3% for the parent Rma TDE
(Figure 4a). Although only mutations at E103 had been
We investigated how chemoselectivity might be controlled
in the enzyme active site of Rma cyt c. Using carbene-bound
wild-type Rma cyt c and Rma TDE as starting structures, we
docked p-dimethylsilylaniline 6 into both enzyme active sites,
with conformation and orientation of 6 resembling how this
substrate attacks the carbene in the DFT-optimized N-
nucleophilic attack TS (Figure 3b). The docked structures
then served as starting points for MD simulations, in which the
showed that in wild-type Rma cyt c, 6 preferentially explores a
near attack conformation that resembles the N-nucleophilic
attack TS, in which the measured ∠C(carbene)−N(substrate
1
previously found to alter the enzyme chemoselectivity, our
results showed that mutations at each of these three positions
have a similar effect on it. This demonstrates that mutations
that influence front loop conformational dynamics may alter
the chemoselectivity of the carbene insertion. When we
combined these three mutations in a single protein (Rma TD
N80F M99P E103I, abbreviated as Rma TDFPI), the resulting
enzyme produces the amination product as 90% of the total
product, suggesting that the front loop now occupies a new
and distinct conformation that selectively favors amination
over silylation. Rma TDFPI also exhibited ∼1.9-fold increased
turnover with respect to the parent Rma TDE variant, mainly
attributed to E103I mutation (Figure 4b).
A computational model for carbene-bound Rma TDFPI was
then generated and used to perform MD simulations to
understand the effects of the new mutations. Our simulations
revealed a significant change in front loop conformation in
Rma TDFPI compared to Rma TDE (Figure 4b). Notably, the
M99P and E103I mutations work synergistically to disfavor the
silylation transition state by changing the conformational
preference of the front loop (M99P) and blocking the
preferred binding pose required for the silane to approach
the IPC (E103I) (Figure 4c). The new active site found in
Rma TDFPI has a substrate access tunnel between the D helix
and the protein front loop that guides substrate 6 to approach
the carbene-bound heme from the top, a trajectory that favors
a near attack, amination conformation via an N-nucleophilic
attack transition state (Figure 4c). This trajectory is also
favored by the N80F mutation: due to steric repulsion between
6
)−C(substrate 6) angle is 121.5° (Figure 3d,e). This is in
contrast to the Rma TDE system, where 6 prefers a binding
pose that resembles the near attack conformation for the
energetically disfavored DFT optimized N−H hydrogen
⧧
−1
abstraction TS (ΔG = 41.7 kcal·mol , Figure 3c) with an
enlarged ∠C(carbene)−N(substrate 6)−C(substrate 6) angle
(Figure 3e) rather than the corresponding N-nucleophilic
attack TS. This change in the preferred near attack
conformation of the substrate is due to the new conformation
explored by the protein front loop in Rma TDE, which is
induced by mutations as previously described (Figure 3b and
Figure 2a). Taken together, DFT calculations and MD
simulations suggest that Rma TDE prevents amination by
disfavoring the N-nucleophilic attack transition state through
front loop conformation and dynamics that, at the same time,
favor silylation.
4
. From Mechanistic Understanding to New Protein
Function: Switching the Chemoselectivity of Rma TDE
from Silylation to Amination. The development of novel
carbene transfer enzymes has largely been driven by
repurposing existing heme proteins and evolving these proteins
1
,3,4,17−21,23,24,35
for improved activity for a specific reaction.
Fundamentally, the process of repurposing and evolving
enzymes for novel reactivity is an alteration of an enzyme’s
selectivity, taking advantage of their intrinsic catalytic
3
6
promiscuity. Understanding the factors that determine
enzyme selectivity may therefore facilitate the development
7
120
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 7114−7123