Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
Table 1: Optimization of the reaction conditions for the RhI-catalyzed
cycloisomerization of benzylallene-alkyne 5a.[a]
5d and 5e, with n-butyl and ethyl substituents at the alkyne
terminus, provided 7d and 7e in good yields (86 and 83%;
entries 3 and 4). On the other hand, the less hindered methyl-
substituted alkyne derivative 5 f afforded the desired com-
pound 7 f in rather low yield (40%),[14] with the formation of
considerable amounts of unidentified side products (entry 5).
The reaction of 5g, which does not benefit from geminal
disubstitution,[15] smoothly proceeded to exclusively furnish
7g in 91% yield (entry 6). The nitrogen (5h) and oxygen (5i)
congeners also exclusively afforded 7h and 7i (89 and 85%;
entries 7 and 8). Overall, a bulky tert-butyl group at the
alkyne terminus seemed to provide better results than linear
alkyl chains. Thus we next examined some silylacetylene
derivatives. Treatment of the TIPS derivatives 5j and 5k with
[RhCl(CO)2]2 in xylene or toluene at reflux provided the
desired vinylsilane derivatives 7j (71%) and 7k (70%) along
with 8j (18%) and 8k (18%), respectively (entries 9 and 10).
The reactions of the TBS analogues 5l and 5m gave similar
results to afford 7l and 7m (67 and 61%; entries 11 and 12).
The silane functional group can be easily elaborated in
various ways.[16] We hence attempted transformations of the
silane moieties in 7j and 7k (Scheme 3). Treatment of 7j with
Entry
Method
Time [h]
Product and yield [%][b]
1
I
I
II
II
0.2
2
0.2
0.2
7a: 77
7a: 56
7a: 82
7a: 91
8a: 19
8a: 10
8a: 13
8a: 3
–
2[c]
3
5a: 34
–
–
4[d]
[a] Method I: A solution of 5a in toluene was heated to reflux in the
presence of the RhI catalyst for 0.2–2 h. Method II: A solution of 5a in
toluene or xylene was added to a toluene or xylene solution of 5 mol%
[RhCl(CO)2]2 at reflux; the reaction mixture was heated at reflux for an
additional 0.2 h. [b] Yield of isolated product. [c] With 2.5 mol% [RhCl-
(CO)2]2. [d] Xylene was used as the solvent.
(PPh3)2, RhCl(dppp)2, and [RhCl(CO)dppp]2, furnished poor
results. To obtain better results, the procedure was slightly
modified: A solution of 5a in toluene was added to a toluene
solution of 5 mol% [RhCl(CO)2]2 at reflux, and the reaction
mixture was heated to reflux for an additional 0.2 h to afford
7a in 82% yield together with 8a in 13% yield (entry 3,
method II).[13] Finally, the best result (highest yield of 7a
(91%) and lowest yield of 8a (3%)) was obtained when
method II was used in combination with a higher reaction
temperature (xylene at reflux; entry 4).
The optimized reaction conditions (Table 1, entry 4) were
then applied to other substrates 5 (Table 2). Treatment of the
ethyl- (5b) and n-butyl-substituted (5c) allene derivatives
with [RhCl(CO)2]2 in xylene at reflux gave the tricyclic
products 7b and 7c (96 and 95%; entries 1 and 2). Substrates
Scheme 3. Transformations of 7j and 7k.
1.5 equiv of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) effected the isomer-
ization of the vinylsilane group into an allylsilane group to
afford 9 in 82% yield. Exposure of 7j and 7k to an excess of
TFA led to desilylation, which was accompanied by migration
of the exo double bond to give 10j (85%) and 10k (92%).[17]
We then turned our attention to the RhI-catalyzed cyclo-
isomerization of 11, which has an electron-withdrawing group
(EWG) at the alkyne terminus, to determine the effect of the
electronic properties of the substituent at the alkyne terminus
(Table 3). Treatment of phosphonate derivative 11a with
[RhCl(CO)2]2 produced 12a in 87% yield alongside a negli-
gible amount of the PKTR adduct 13a (entry 1). Neither an
ester nor a ketone functional group inhibited this cyclo-
isomerization. Indeed, substrates with an ester moiety, 11b
and 11c, exclusively furnished 12b and 12c (80 and 91%;
entries 2 and 3). The acetyl derivative 11d afforded 12d
(79%) and 13d (9%; entry 4). Chloro-substituted 11e could
be converted into 12e in acceptable yield (67%; entry 5). The
reaction of 11 f, which features an electron-withdrawing para-
nitrophenyl group, furnished 12 f[14] in 79% yield (entry 6).
Although the simple phenyl derivative 11g also gave 12g[14]
(entry 7), the yield (62%) was somewhat lower than for 12 f
(entry 7 vs. 6). Phenyl derivative 11h, with a methyl-substi-
tuted allene, gave 12h[18] in 96% yield (entry 8). It thus
became clear that various EWGs were tolerated at the alkyne
terminus in this cyclization. In combination with the results
shown in Tables 2 and 3, we concluded that the ring-closing
Table 2: [RhCl(CO)2]2 catalyzed cycloisomerization of benzylallene-
alkynes 5.[a]
Entry
5
R1
R2
X
Time [h] Product and yield [%][b]
1
2
3
4
5b tBu Et
5c tBu nBu C(CO2Me)2 0.2
5d nBu Me C(CO2Me)2 0.2
C(CO2Me)2 0.2
7b: 96
7c: 95
7d: 86
7e: 83
7 f: 40[d]
7g: 91
7h: 89
7i: 85
8b: 4
8c: 5
8d: 6
8e: 4
–
–
5e Et
Me C(CO2Me)2 0.2
5[c] 5 f Me Me C(CO2Me)2 0.2
[e]
6
7
8
5g tBu Me CH2
5h tBu Me NTs
5i tBu Me
0.2
0.2
0.2
–
–
O
9[f] 5j TIPS Me C(CO2Me)2 0.7
7j: 71
7k: 70
7l: 67
8j: 18
8k: 18
8l: 19
8m: 18
10[c] 5k TIPS nBu C(CO2Me)2
1
11[c] 5l TBS Me C(CO2Me)2 0.2
12[c] 5m TBS nBu C(CO2Me)2 0.5
7m: 61
[a] The reaction conditions are the same as those in Table 1, entry 3 or 4.
[b] Yield of isolated product. [c] Toluene as the solvent. [d] Yield
1
determined by H NMR analysis. [e] Unidentified byproducts were
obtained. [f] With 10 mol% [RhCl(CO)2]2. TBS=tert-butyldimethylsilyl,
TIPS=triisopropylsilyl, Ts=para-toluenesulfonyl.
2
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!