surprising observation because the strongly dipolar azulene moiety
usually stacks five-membered rings above seven-membered.13 The
opposite arrangement here implies that the dipolar contribution in 3
is small. Another notable feature of Fig. 2 is that it shows the
molecules of 3 within the bc plane to be > 5 Å apart.
Curie Development Host Fellowship HPMD-CT-2000-00053
(L.J.H.).
Notes and references
‡
Crystal data: 3: C17
16 7 1
H O , M = 332.3, orthorhombic, space group Pna2 ,
A surprisingly large number of possible mechanisms can be
advanced for the formation of an azulene from E-2 and an alkyne.
A number of difficulties attend each of them, the most notable
3
a = 7.3017(7), b = 19.2542(18), c = 11.0940(17) Å, U = 1559.7(3) Å ,
23
T = 293(2) K, Z = 4, D = 1.415 Mg m , crystal dimensions 0.77 3 0.4
c
3 0.5 mm, Mo-Ka radiation, l = 0.71073 Å. Data were collected on a
14
being that phosphorus ylides do not readily react with esters and
Bruker Smart Apex diffractometer and a total of 3019 of the 10842
cyclopentadienyl ylides do not undergo Wittig reaction at all.1 We
,2
2
reflections were unique [R(int) = 0.0195]. Refinement on F , wR2 =
have performed an extensive set of mechanistic investigations15
0.0908 (all data), R1 = 0.0376 for [I > 2s(I)]. CCDC 225162. See
http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/cc/b3/b316759c/ for crystallographic data in
that enabled us to eliminate five of the potential mechanisms to
arrive at our best proposal shown in Scheme 1. The most important
observation was that we could isolate a bis-alkyne adduct 4 from
the reaction mixture in low yield but this compound did not lead to
azulene under any conditions tried, thermal or photochemical. Also
relevant is that adduct E-2 is thermally stable in the absence of
alkyne.
.cif or other electronic format.
1
2
F. Ramirez and S. Levy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1957, 79, 6167; F. Ramirez
and S. Levy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1957, 79, 67.
W. Johnson, Ylides and Imines of Phosphorus, Wiley & Sons, Inc., New
York, 1990, p. 79.
3 Z. Yoshida, S. Yoneda, Y. Murata and H. Hashimoto, Tetrahedron Lett.,
971, 1523; Z. Yoshida, S. Yoneda, Y. Murata and H. Hashimoto,
1
Tetrahedron Lett., 1971, 1527; Z. Yoshida, S. Yoneda and Y. Murata, J.
Org. Chem., 1973, 38, 3537.
4
5
By single crystal X-ray crystallography: L. J. Higham, P. G. Kelly, H.
Müller-Bunz and D. G. Gilheany, submitted for publication.
(a) T. Tomiyama, I. Tomiyama and M. Yokota (Kotobuki Seiyaku K.
K.); JP2000007611, 2000; (b) W.-G. Friebe, F. Grams, R. Haag, H.
Leinert and J. Dickhaut (Boehringer Mannheim GmbH); US6121322,
2
000; (c) C. S. Slavtcheff, S. R. Barrow, V. D. Kanga, M. C. Cheney and
We suggest therefore that the azulene forming reaction involves
a different mode of reaction of the second alkyne molecule and we
propose: first, its cycloaddition across the C4–C5 bond of the
cyclopentadiene ring, then ring expansion to a seven-membered
ring and, last, Wittig reaction to form azulene.
An alternative scenario is that the Wittig step precedes the ring
expansion. In both cases we reason that the Wittig reaction is now
more likely as a result of both the loss of aromaticity in the five-
membered ring at that stage in the reaction and additionally the
resonance energy gained from formation of the azulene. One
drawback to the proposed mechanism is that the [2+2] addition is
disallowed thermally, although it may be tentatively suggested that
the reaction proceeds in a polar stepwise manner as distinct from a
concerted process.
A. Znaiden (Unilever); WO9503779, 1995; (d) Y. Nakamura, S. Yaoi,
T. Tanaka, Y. Katagiri, S. Ishimaru, S. Takezawa and S. Yoshida
(Fujitsu Limited); US2003129516, 2003; (e) S. E. Estdale, R. Brettle, D.
A. Dunmur and C. M. Marson, J. Mater. Chem., 1997, 7, 391; (f) M.
Findlater, M. Heeney, M. Shkunov, L. Farrand, M. Giles, I. McCulloch,
D. Sparrowe, M. Thompson and S. Tierney (Merck Patent GmbH);
EP1318185, 2003.
D. Lloyd, The Chemistry of Conjugated Cyclic Compounds, John Wiley
&
Houk, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1979, 101, 251 and references therein; R. L.
Danheiser and D. A. Becker, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 389; K.
Hafner and K.-P. Meinhardt, Organic Syntheses, Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
New York, Collect. Vol. VII, p. 15, 1990; H. Wakabayashi, P.-W.
Yang, C.-P. Wu, K. Shindo, S. Ishikawa and T. Nozoe, Heterocycles,
1992, 34, 429 and references therein; J. L. Kane, Jr, K. M. Shea, A. L.
Crombie and R. L. Danheiser, Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 1081.
7 An arsenic methylcyclohepta-2,4,6-trienone ylide forms azulenes with
dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate, but the phosphorus analogues showed
no such reactivity in that reaction: M. Nitta and Y. Mitsumoto, J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2002, 2268.
6
Sons: Chichester, 1989, Ch. 13; D. Mukherjee, L. C. Dunn and K. N.
An investigation into the scope of this reaction and a detailed
mechanistic study15 will be the subject of a future report.
The authors thank the National University of Ireland, Maynooth,
University College Dublin and Enterprise Ireland for Scholarships
(P.G.K. and D.M.C.) and the European Commission for a Marie
8
Two 6-ethynyl-5-alkyl-1,3-dicarboxylates have been reported: T.
Morita, T. Fujita and K. Takase, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1980, 53,
1
647.
9
K. Yamamura, N. Kusuhara, Y. Houda, M. Sasabe, H. Takagi and M.
Hashimoto, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 6609.
1
0 Y. Lu, D. M. Lemal and J. P. Jasinski, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122,
440 and references cited therein.
2
1
1
1 A. W. Hansen, Acta Crystallogr., 1965, 19, 19.
2 H. L. Ammon and M. Sundaralingam, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1966, 88,
4
794.
1
3 A recent example is [4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]-3-guaiazulenyl-methy-
lium tetrafluoroborate which displays a p-stacking separation of 4.2 Å
that is arranged so as to mutually negate dipole moments: M. Sasaki, M.
Nakamura, T. Uriu, H. Takekuma, T. Minematsu, M. Yoshihara and S.
Takekuma, Tetrahedron, 2003, 59, 505.
1
4 K. B. Becker, Tetrahedron, 1980, 36, 1717; H. J. Bestman, G. Schade,
H. Lutke and T. Monius, Chem. Ber., 1985, 118, 2640; M. Hatanaka, Y.
Himeda and I. Ueda, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1990, 526; W.
Ding, P. Zhang and P. Cao, Tetrahedron Lett., 1987, 28, 81.
5 L. J. Higham, P. G. Kelly, D. M. Corr and D. G. Gilheany, manuscript
in preparation.
1
Scheme 1 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 3.
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 6 8 4 – 6 8 5
685