Y.-L. Zhu et al. / Electrochimica Acta 55 (2010) 9019–9023
9023
by the Shaifker’s nucleation and growth model [32], the initial
Acknowledgment
stage of Ni deposition on a Pt electrode in the electrolyte with
ACN can be explained better by instantaneous nucleation rather
than progressive one. Thus, the nucleation mechanism was not
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the
Japanese Government (Monbukagakusho) Scholarship.
2+
affected by the change in the coordination environment of Ni
−
2+
from [Ni(TFSA)3] to [Ni(ACN)6] [22].
References
[
[
1] D. Landolt, J. Electroanal. Chem. 149 (2002) S9.
2] R.O. Kova, A. Turonova, D. Kladekova, M. Galova, R.M. Smith, J. Appl. Elec-
trochem. 36 (2006) 957.
3
.4. Electrodeposition of Ni
Electrodeposition of Ni on
a
copper substrate in 0.05 M
[3] D. Golodnitsky, Y. Rosenberg, A. Ulus, Electrochim. Acta 47 (2002) 2707.
[
4] A. Ciszewski, S. Posluszny, G. Milczarek, M. Baraniak, Surf. Coat. Technol. 183
2004) 127.
5] K.M. Yin, J. Electrochem. Soc. 144 (1997) 1560.
Ni(TFSA) /BMPTFSA without and with 0.3 M ACN were per-
formed by galvanostatic electrolysis with a current density of
2
(
[
−2
◦
−
0.05 mA cm at 50 C. Fine-grained and smoother deposit was
[6] A.C. Mishra, A.K. Thakur, V. Srinivas, J. Mater. Sci. 44 (2009) 3520.
[7] K.R. Marikkannu, G.P. Kalaignan, T. Vasudevan, J. Alloys Compd. 438 (2007) 332.
[
[
[10] C.C. Roth, H. Leidheiser, J. Electrochem. Soc. 100 (1953) 553.
[11] M. Troyon, L. Wang, Appl. Surf. Sci. 103 (1996) 517.
[12] L. Oniciu, L. Muresan, J. Appl. Electrochem. 21 (1991) 565.
13] T. Mimani, S.M. Mayanna, J. Appl. Electrochem. 23 (1993) 339.
[14] N. Kaneko, N. Shinohara, Y. Itoh, H. Nezu, Bunseki Kagaku 40 (1991) 655.
[15] Y. Nakamura, N. Kaneko, M. Watanabe, H. Nezu, J. Appl. Electrochem. 24 (1994)
227.
16] G.T. Rogers, M.J. Ware, J. Electrochem. Soc. 107 (1960) 677.
17] A. Bhandari, S.J. Hearne, B.W. Sheldon, S.K. Soni, J. Electrochem. Soc. 156 (2009)
D279.
obtained in the presence of ACN, as shown in Fig. 7, probably
related to an increase in the number of nuclei by formation of
8] Y. Katayama, R. Fukui, T. Miura, J. Electrochem. Soc. 154 (2007) D534.
9] E.B. Sauhestre, Plating (1958) 1119.
2
+
[
Ni(ACN)6] , as described above. The change in the morphology
of electrode deposits is also considered related to the adsorption of
2
+
[
Ni(ACN)6] on the electrode. As described above, in the presence
[
2
+
of ACN, [Ni(ACN)6] can access to the negatively charged electrode
surface in addition to BMP . If BMP is assumed as an inhibitor for
crystal growth, a decrease in the population of BMP at the elec-
trode surface is expected to promote crystal growth to give fine and
granular deposits. In the absence of ACN, course and less adher-
ent deposits are obtained probably because the active sites on the
+
+
+
[
[
[
[
18] T.A. Costavaras, M. Froment, A.H. Goff, J. Electrochem. Soc. 120 (1973) 867.
19] A.P. Abbott, K.E. Ttaib, K.S. Ryder, E.L. Smith, Trans. Inst. Met. Finish. 86 (2008)
+
electrode surface are mainly dominated by BMP .
234.
[
[
20] P.X. Yang, M.Z. An, C.N. Su, F.P. Wang, Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 25 (2009) 112.
21] J. Ding, J. Wu, D. MacFarlane, W.E. Price, G. Wallace, Electrochem. Commun. 10
4
. Conclusions
(
2008) 217.
[
22] Y.-L. Zhu, Y. Kozuma, Y. Katayama, T. Miura, Electrochim. Acta 54 (2009) 7502.
The coordination environment of Ni(II) changed from
[23] K. Fujii, T. Nonaka, Y. Akimoto, Y. Umebayashi, S. Ishiguro, Anal. Sci. 24 (2008)
1377.
[
[
−
2+
[
Ni(TFSA)3]
to [Ni(ACN)6]
with addition of ACN in
24] M. Yamagata, Y. Katayama, T. Miura, J. Electrochem. Soc. 153 (2006) E5.
25] B.N. Figgis, Introduction to Ligand Fields, John Wiley and Sons, New York, Lon-
don, 1966 (Chapter 9).
Ni(TFSA) /BMPTFSA due to the donor property of ACN being
2
−
stronger than TFSA . This positively charged complexes made
the reduction potential of Ni(II)/Ni shift to the more positive side
and the diffusion coefficient of Ni(II) species become larger. The
nucleation/growth mechanism of Ni(II)/Ni was not affected by
addition of ACN into the ionic liquid. Fine-grained and smoother
deposit was obtained by galvanostatic cathodic reduction in
[26] J.J. Banewicz, J.A. Maguire, M.E. Munnell, M.L. Moore, Thermochim. Acta 12
1975) 377.
(
[
27] M. Herstedt, M. Smirnov, P. Johansson, M. Chami, J. Grondin, L. Servant, J.C.
Lassegues, J. Raman Spectrosc. 36 (2005) 762.
[28] P. Johansson, S.P. Gejji, J. Tegenfeldt, J. Lindgren, Electrochim. Acta 43 (1998)
375.
29] T.C. Franklin, Surf. Coat. Technol. 30 (1987) 415.
1
[
Ni(TFSA) /BMPTFSA with ACN. This result indicates that the
2
[30] A.J. Bard, L.R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods, Fundamentals and Applica-
tions, 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 2001.
additive is also important for controlling the electrode reactions
and the morphology of the deposits in the ionic liquids, as known
in the aqueous solutions. However, it is necessary to elucidate
the detailed mechanism of the effects of these additives on the
electrodeposition of metals in the ionic liquids.
[
[
31] J. Jacquemin, P. Husson, V. Mayer, I. Cibulka, J. Chem. Eng. Data 52 (2007) 2204.
32] B. Scharifker, G. Hills, Electrochim. Acta 28 (1983) 879.