Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
Page 4 of 5
DOI: 10.1039/C9CC04123K
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
1
sensor M1 with O2 resulted in the gradual decrease of the the importance of the through‐bond (Dexter‐type) mechanism
tetracene absorbance at 500 nm, whereas the absorption band of intramolecular energy migration in fluorescent CPs. On
at 385 nm (corresponding to the
the (arylene vinylene) system) persisted (and actually increased turn‐on sensors for many other important analytes of interest.
its absorbance) (Fig. 2b). This indicated that the reaction with We gratefully acknowledge support of this research by the
1O2 occurred at one of the central benzene rings of 1,4‐ National Science Foundation (grant number CHE‐1362686).
disubstituted tetracene system, and the extended ‐conjugated
‐electron conjugation across practical side, this concept can be used for designing amplifying
(arylene vinylene) system remained mostly unaffected. To
determine what specific benzene ring in the 1,4‐disubstituted
tetracene unit reacted with 1O2, we carried out 1H NMR
monitoring of the reaction of M1 with 1O2. This reaction
produced a main product showing a distinct singlet peak at 6.61
ppm (corresponding to the bridgehead protons at the dioxygen
bridge in the endo‐peroxide). To assign this and other 1H NMR
signals to a specific endo‐peroxide, we carried out GIAO
computational studies on a truncated analogue of M1 and the
corresponding endo‐peroxides (Fig. S5 in the SI). The
computations confirmed that the dioxygen bridge was more
likely to form at the 5,12 positions of the tetracene unit, as the
calculated NMR shift for the corresponding bridgehead proton
was 6.72 ppm which was close to the experimentally observed
value. Other experimental chemical shifts also matched the
values calculated for this specific structure. This reactivity
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
Notes and references
1
T. M. Swager, Acc. Chem. Res., 1998, 31, 201; X. Feng, L. Liu,
S. Wang, D. Zhu, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 2411; Y. Liu, K.
Ogawa, K. S. Schanze, J. Photochem. Photobiol., C, 2009, 10
173.
S. W. Thomas III, D. J. Guy, T. M. Swager, Chem. Rev., 2007,
107, 1339; S. Rochat, T. M. Swager, ACS Appl. Mater.
Interfaces, 2013, 5, 4488.
J.‐S. Yang, T. M. Swager, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 11864;
L. Chen, D. W. McBranch, H.‐L. Wang, R. Helgeson, F. Wudl,
D. G. Whitten, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1999, 96, 12287; X.
Sun, Y. Wang, Y. Lei, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 8019; H.
Jiang, P. Taranekar, J. R. Reynolds, K. S. Schanze, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 4300.
,
2
3
1
pattern with O2 also agreed well with the UV/vis absorption
spectroscopy observations.
With this information, we could analyse the spectroscopic
data obtained for the polymer sensor P1. The UV/vis absorption
spectrum showed gradual decrease between 480 and 630 nm
due to the consumption of tetracene unit through its reaction
with O2 (Fig. 2c). At the same time, at the earlier stages of
photoirradiation, there was no decrease in the absorbance (or
even a slight increase) within the range of 360 – 480 nm where
4
5
T.‐H. Kim, T. M. Swager, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2003, 42,
4803.
D. Pangeni, E. E. Nesterov, Macromolecules, 2013, 46, 7266.;
C.‐H. Chiang, D. Pangeni, E. E. Nesterov, Macromolecules,
2017, 50, 6961.
D. Beljonne, C. Curutchet, G. D. Scholes, R. J. Silbey, J. Phys.
Chem. B, 2009, 113, 6583; C. F. Wang, J. D. White, T. L. Lim, J.
H. Hsu, S. C. Yang, W. S. Fann, K. Y. Peng, S. A. Chen, Phys.
Rev. B, 2003, 67, 035202; B. Van Averbeke, D. Beljonne, E.
Hennebicq, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2008, 18, 492; E. E. Nesterov,
Z. Zhu, T. M. Swager, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 10083.
M. C. DeRosa, R. J. Crutchley, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2002, 233‐
234, 351; P. Agostinis, K. Berg, K. A. Cengel, T. H. Foster, A.
W. Girotti, S. A. Gollnick, S. M. Hahn, M. R. Hamblin, A.
Juzeniene, D. Kessel, M. Korbelik, J. Moan, P. Mroz, D. Nowis,
1
6
the ‐electron conjugation in the CP backbone was the main
contributor. These changes in the absorption spectra were
accompanied by a dramatic intensity increase in the fluorescent
emission band, but with essentially no emission wavelength
shift. Thus, formation of the endo‐peroxide at 5,12 positions of
the tetracene unit was responsible for a HOMO‐LUMO gap
increase which created “roadblocks” for the excitons migrating
7
J. Piette, B. C. Wilson, J. Golab, CA Cancer J. Clin., 2011, 61
250; D. E. J. G. J. Dolmans, D. Fukumura, R. K. Jain, Nat. Rev.
Cancer, 2003, , 380; R. D. Scurlock, B. Wang, P. R. Ogilby, J.
R. Sheats, R. L. Clough, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 10194.
Y. You, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2018, 16, 4044.
J. Zhang, S. Sarrafpour, R. H. Pawle, S. W. Thomas III, Chem.
Commun., 2011, 47, 3445; E. Altinok, Z. C. Smith, S. W.
Thomas III, Macromolecules, 2015, 48, 6825; F. Frausto, S. W.
,
in the CP
‐conjugated backbone, and produced significant
turn‐on fluorescent response. We should also notice that a
longer exposure of the P1 sensor to 1O2 (at the later stages of
photoirradiation) led to
hypsochromic shift in the maximum of the emission band and a
smaller intensity increase as well as absorbance decrease of the
360 – 480 nm absorption band (traces corresponding to 40 and
60 min in Fig. 2c, d). Apparently, this was due to a subsequent
reaction of 1O2 at the 1,4 positions of tetracene ring resulting in
3
a noticeable (approx. 35 nm)
8
9
Thomas III, ChemPhotoChem, 2018, 2, 632.
10 M. P. Cava, A. A. Deana, K. Muth, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1959,
81, 6458; K. N. Plunkett, K. Godula, C. Nuckolls, N. Tremblay,
A. C. Whalley, S. Xiao, Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 2225.
breakdown of the ‐electron conjugation in the CP backbone.
In conclusion, we demonstrated how the simple “higher
energy gap” concept can be used in the design of an efficient
amplifying turn‐on CP fluorescent sensor. This concept is based
on hindering intramolecular exciton migration occurring via a
through‐bond (Dexter) mechanism when a higher energy
(HOMO‐LUMO) gap site is created in the polymer ‐electron
conjugated backbone upon reacting with a target analyte. From
a fundamental standpoint, the success of this design illustrates
11 A. C. Williams, B. W. Barry, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 2004, 56
,
603.
12 J. Schmitt, V. Heitz, A. Sour, F. Bolze, H. Ftouni, J.‐F. Nicoud,
L. Flamigni, B. Ventura, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 64, 169;
N. Yesilgul, T. B. Uyar, O. Seven, E. U. Akkaya, ACS Omega,
2017, 2, 1367.
13 R. P. Taylor, J. B. Vatz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1973, 95, 5820.
4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1‐3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins