M.E. Moussa et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 577 (2013) 693–700
695
water, and 120 ml ethanol for 2–3 min. The microstructures of the specimens were
analyzed by optical microscope (OM) (model OPTIKA M-790, Italy). In the present
study, the average length of primary Mg2Si was measured as the size of Mg2Si.
Six OM micrographs were taken for each sample from the observed area at a low
magnification of 100Â. The average size of the primary Mg2Si was measured by Im-
ageJ1.44 software. All Mg2Si existed in one picture taken from the observed area
were measured.
Energy dispersion spectrum (EDS) (model INCA PENTAFET X3, England) affili-
ated to the scanning electron microscope (SEM) (model JSM-5410, Japan) was per-
formed to reveal the concentration of alloying elements in selected areas of the
microstructure. Phase constituents of samples were analyzed by X-ray diffraction
(XRD) (model X’PERT PRO, The Netherlands) using Cu Ka radiation in step scan of
2h from 20° to 80° with an increment of 0.02° and a scanning speed of 4°/min.
3. Results
3.1. The first group
According to the Mg–Si binary phase diagram [39], Mg–5 wt.%Si
alloy is a typical hypereutectic alloy. As-cast microstructures of
Mg–5 wt.%Si alloy processed without and with HIUST at different
pouring temperatures for 90 s are shown in Fig. 4a–f. The micro-
structures of hypereutectic base alloy reveal the presence of pri-
mary Mg2Si, Mg halos and eutectic Mg–Mg2Si. Moreover, all the
primary Mg2Si are surrounded by Mg halos, and then by eutectic
structure [8]. Without HIUST, the primary Mg2Si shows a coarse
dendritic morphology with the average size of about 200
shown in Fig. 4a.
lm, as
With the application of HIUST for 90 s at pouring temperature of
770 °C, most of primary Mg2Si phases are still dendrite, but their
average size are reduced significantly to about 80 lm, as shown in
Fig. 4b. As the pouring temperature increases from 780 to 800 °C,
most of primary Mg2Si phases become polyhedral shape and their
average size are reduced from about 43 to 33 lm respectively, as
shown in Fig. 4c–e. When the pouring temperature is further in-
creased to 810 °C, the average size of primary Mg2Si increases
slightly again to about 43 lm, as shown in Fig. 4f. Therefore, under
the application of HIUST at different pouring temperatures for
90 s, the average size of primary Mg2Si decreases significantly with
increasing pouring temperature, reaches a minimum at 800 °C, and
then increases slightly with further increasing pouring temperature
as compared without the application of HIUST, as shown in Fig. 5.
To ascertain phase constituents, composition and structure of
the based hypereutectic Mg–5 wt.%Si alloys, XRD and EDS were
conducted for both conditions without and with HIUST at pouring
temperature of 800 °C for 90 s respectively. XRD results reveal that
the constituents of the obtained microstructures for both condi-
tions without and with HIUST are only Mg2Si and Mg phases, as
shown in Fig. 6. Therefore, no change of the phase constituents ob-
tained due to HIUST.
The SEM image, EDS line scan and EDS elemental mapping of Si
and Mg for the based hypereutectic Mg–5 wt.%Si alloy without and
with HIUST at pouring temperature of 800 °C for 90 s are shown in
Figs. 7 and 8, respectively. It can be seen that the coarse primary
Mg2Si is formed by the preferred growth that occurs at the tips
of branches in the alloy without HIUST (Fig. 7a), resulting in com-
plex regular, sharp-angled and dendritic morphologies with a non-
uniform distribution of Mg in the interdendritic regions (Fig. 7b–d).
With the HIUST, the morphology of primary Mg2Si changes from
coarse dendritic structure to fine polyhedral shape (Fig. 8a) with
a network of Mg segregated along the grain boundaries (Fig. 8b–d).
Fig. 3. Schematic of the experimental setup used in this study.
samples. Therefore, the difference in the morphology and size of primary Mg2Si in
the microstructures of investigated samples were obtained mainly as a result of the
difference in the application of HIUST conditions.
Two types of experiments were carried out, namely the first group and the sec-
ond group. In the first group, HIUST which was generated by using ultrasonic gen-
erator (model TS6MD1, Russia) and magnetostrict transducer (model PMS-15-22,
Russia) with the maximum output power of 5 KW and the fixed frequency of
21.4 kHz was applied right before the melt was poured into cylindrical resin-
bonded sand mold. The HIUST effect was studied in this group at different desig-
nated pouring temperatures (770, 780, 790, 800, 810 °C) for 90 s above the liquidus
temperature of the investigated alloy of 767 °C (Fig. 2). At the end of planed HIUST
application time, the ultrasonic source was switched off and the melt was left to
room temperature. Pouring temperatures were controlled within an accuracy
of 2 °C. The ultrasonic waves emitted from the transducer and passed through
the acoustic sonotrode were propagated directly into the melt during solidification.
The poured melt became a part of acoustic sonotrode, so the action of ultrasonic en-
ergy on the melt was raised remarkably. For comparison, a sample without the
application of HIUST was prepared at pouring temperature of 800 °C. In the second
group, the application of HIUST was carried out for different vibration times 10, 50,
90, 130 s at optimum pouring temperature based on the results of the first group.
3.2. The second group
2.2. Materials characterization
The second group was carried out at optimum pouring temper-
ature of 800 °C based on the results of the first group for different
ultrasonic vibration times of 10, 50, 90 and 130 s. With the appli-
cation of HIUST for 10 s, the morphologies of primary Mg2Si are
All metallographic specimens were cut from the bottom of castings at the same
position of 10 mm above the sonotrode contact level of cylindrical samples. The
samples were prepared according to usual procedures developed for magnesium al-
loys [38] and etched by solution with 10 ml nitric acid, 30 ml acetic acid, 40 ml