C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Inhibitors 3-6
Figure 3. Inhibitor-5-bound X-ray structure of memapsin 2.
On the basis of this molecular insight into the selectivity, we
designed the oxazolylmethyl P3-ligand for inhibitor 6 (MW 659).
This provided by far the most potent (M2 Ki 0.12 nM) and selective
inhibitor (>3800-fold over M1 and >2500-fold over CD). We have
also determined the cellular inhibition of memapsin 2 by inhibitors
5 and 6 in Chinese hamster ovary cells. They have shown an
average cellular IC50 value of 1.4 and 1.7 µM respectively,
compared to an IC50 value of 45 µM for 1.13
Table 1. Ki Values and Selectivities for Inhibitors 2-6a
selectivity ratios
In conclusion, our structure-based design led to the development
of very potent and highly selective memapsin 2 inhibitors.
Furthermore, our X-ray structural analysis of protein-inhibitor
complexes has uncovered potentially important molecular interac-
tions useful in the design of selectivity against other aspartyl
proteases. Additional studies to further elucidate the role of these
and other interactions important for selectivity are in progress.
compd
M2 (nM)
M1 (nM)
CD (nM)
M1/M2
CD/M2
IC50 (µM)
2
3
4
5
6
2.5
14
4.4
0.3
0.12
1.2
811
161
356
458
nd
25
15
131
304
-
58
36
-
1.8
3
436
>2500
6.5
nd
nd
1.4
1.7
1186
>3800
a Data represent the mean value of 3-5 determinations; memapsin 2
(M2), memapsin 1 (M1), cathepsin D (CD); nd, not determined.
Acknowledgment. Financial support by the National Institutes
of Health (AG 18933) is gratefully acknowledged.
Potencies of various inhibitors were determined against recom-
binant memapsin 2, memapsin 1, and human cathepsin D. The
results are shown in Table 1. As shown, inhibitor 2 with P3-Boc-
Val is more potent for memapsin 1 than memapsin 2. Incorporation
of pyrazolylmethyl urethane in place of P3-Boc-Val provided
inhibitor 3 having a >5-fold reduction in potency for memapsin 2
compared to inhibitor 2. Inhibitor 3 also showed significantly
reduced activity against M1 with a Ki value of 811 nM (58-fold
selectivity over M1) but showed little selectivity for M2 over CD.
Inhibitor 4 with a P3′-isobutylamide and P2-methylcysteine has
shown a 3-fold enhancement of M2 potency. It has also shown
>36-fold selectivity over M1 and a modest 3-fold selectivity over
CD. Based upon inhibitor models, the P2-methionine in 3 or P2-
methylcysteine side chain in 4 does not appear to be forming a
hydrogen bond with Arg-235 of memapsin 2. However, the
corresponding P2-sulfone of 4 appears to be in close proximity to
Arg-235 of memapsin 2. Indeed, oxidation of the P2-methyl cysteine
provided inhibitor 5 (MW 658) with very impressive potency (M2
Ki 0.3 nM) and selectivity for memapsin 2. It displayed 1186-fold
selectivity over M1 and 436-fold selectivity over CD.
To gain further molecular insight, the 5-bound memapsin 2 X-ray
structure was determined at 1.8 Å resolution (Figure 3).12 As it
appears from the structure, one of the P3-pyrazole nitrogens is within
hydrogen-bonding distance to Thr-232 with one of the dimethyl
groups effectively filling in the shallow hydrophobic pocket in the
S3-subsite and the other occupying the hydrophobic S3-site. In
addition, the P2-sulfone functionality is within hydrogen-bonding
distance to Arg-235 as well as with a tightly bound water molecule
in the S2-site. These interactions of the P2 and P3 ligands are
presumably responsible for the observed enhanced selectivity for
inhibitor 5 compared to that for inhibitor 4.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
spectral data for 3-6, 10-14, and X-ray information and complete ref
3a. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
(1) Vassar, R.; Citron, M. Neuron 2000, 27, 419.
(2) (a) Roggo, A. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2002, 2, 359. (b) Olson, R. E.;
Thompson, L. A. Ann. Rep. Med. Chem. 2000, 35, 31.
(3) (a) Vassar, R. et al. Science 1999, 286, 735. (b) Lin, X.; Koelsch, G.;
Wu, S.; Downs, D.; Dashti, A.; Tang, J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2000, 97, 1456. (c) Sinha, S.; Lieberburg, I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
1999, 96, 11049.
(4) (a) Selkoe, D. J. Nature 1999, 399A, 23. (b) Selkoe, D. Physiol. ReV.
2001, 81, 741.
(5) Turner, R.; Koelsch, G.; Hong, L.; Castenheira, P.; Ghosh, A. K.; Tang,
J. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 10001.
(6) (a) Ghosh, A. K.; Shin, D.; Downs, D.; Koelsch, G.; Lin, X.; Ermolieff,
J.; Tang, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3522. (b) Ghosh, A. K.; Bilcer,
G.; Harwood: C.; Kawahama, R.; Shin, D.; Downs, D.; Hussain, K. A.;
Hong, L.; Loy, J. A.; Nguyen, C.; Koelsch, G.; Ermolieff, J.; Tang, J. J.
Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 2865.
(7) Hong, L.; Koelsch, G.; Lin, X.; Wu, S.; Terzyan, S.; Ghosh, A. K.; Zhang,
X. C.; Tang, J. Science 2000, 290, 150.
(8) Turner, R. T.; Loy, J. A.; Nguyen, C.; Devasamudram, T.; Ghosh, A. K.;
Koelsch, G.; Tang, J. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 8742.
(9) Diment, S.; Leech, M. S.; Stahl, P. D. J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263, 6901.
(10) Ghosh, A. K.; Duong, T. T.; McKee, S. P.; Thompson, W. J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1992, 33, 2781.
(11) Kukla, M. J.; Fortunato, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 5003.
(12) The protein-ligand X-ray structure of 5-bound memapsin 2 has been
deposited in PDB (PDB ID: 2G94). For a stereoview and crystallographic
information, please see Supporting Information
(13) Chang, W. P., Koelsch, G.; Wong, S.; Downs, D.; Da, H.; Weerasena,
V.; Gordon, B.; Devasamudram, T.; Bilcer, G.; Ghosh, A. K.; Tang, J. J.
Neurochem. 2004, 89, 1409.
JA058636J
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 16, 2006 5311